I would suggest you hire bucky.
He can be the PR manager
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would suggest you hire bucky.
9 W's didn't get Stew fired. His approach to building a team and staff got him fired. Peter Princaple.8-4 is mediocre. 9 wins a season got Stewart fired.
That and keeping a team of 55 or 56 players.9 W's didn't get Stew fired. His approach to building a team and staff got him fired. Peter Princaple.
And specifically what was the approach that was so wrong that he only won 9 games a year?9 W's didn't get Stew fired. His approach to building a team and staff got him fired. Peter Princaple.
You are not even close. Juvenile sports forum myth.That and keeping a team of 55 or 56 players.
He beat ranked teams and P5 schools. He won against #3 Oklahoma, something Holgs nor Brown can do. He was 2-2 in Bowl games. WVU was slowly dropping off because he was holding a roster of 55 to 60 players.People pull the 9 wins for Stewart out, but ignore WHO those 9 wins came against.
Also ignore who he LOST to.
Its not like he was beating B12 squads or something.
Sure whatever bucky.You are not even close. Juvenile sports forum myth.
Saving schollies for deserving walk on is an excellent strategy to build a program.You are not even close. Juvenile sports forum myth.
Most all coaches have done this to some degree although with the portal I can see less and less.Saving schollies for deserving walk on is an excellent strategy to build a program.
8-4 is mediocre. 9 wins a season got Stewart fired.
5-4 in conference is mediocre by any measurement. Not bad...and certainly not good. Just enough that guys who never played the game but carried water bottles would call success.8-4 IS MEDIOCRE IS NONSENSE. I KNOW YOU'RE TRYING TO BE FUNNY. BUT YOU'RE NOT.
I call BS on the thinking that coaches "save" schollies for walk ons. Coaches will give a scgollie to a walk on to fill an opening in a prior class when a spot comes open and keeps them close to the 85. But not using the 25/yr to save for walk ons is a foolish plan.Most all coaches have done this to some degree although with the portal I can see less and less.
5-4 in conference is mediocre by any measurement. Not bad...and certainly not good. Just enough that guys who never played the game but carried water bottles would call success.
Lol...she should have taught you to spell apparently. What does medoiocre mean? Sounds like a prehistoric lizard. Do remember them from your youth? And where the hell is Mononongah? That sounds like it may be near Apache Junction. By the way mediocre translates into...average. Kansas in case you haven't noticed has been not average but bad...except when they played WVU. Final thought...posts like this one make you look as foolish as a water boy on a high school football team.AGAIN, YOU OVERSTATED. 5-4 IN BIG 12 IS AVERAGE, BUT NOT "MEDIOCRE." MEDOIOCRE IS KANSAS AND TEAMS NEAR KANSAS IN THE BOTTOM THIRD OF THE STANDINGS. BY DEFINITION, THE MIDDLE OF THE STANDINGS IS AVERAGE. MY MONONONGAH HIGH TEACHER, MARY TURKOVICH, TAUGHT ME EXCELLENT MATH. TOO BAD YOU DIDN'T HAVE HER.
We have to understand the state of the program when NB took the reigns. The previous staff's recruiting had significantly slipped the last few years, in addition when Brown was hired, he inherited one of the youngest rosters in all of D1. He did not have a blue chip or experienced QB, WR, RB, or OL. However in a short time, Brown has managed to outperform relative to formal expectations/projections, esp considering the talent & youth he was dealt. Also in this period, NB has managed to improve the overall talent level, however while they may have higher upside, they are all still very young & inexperienced.
We saw significant strides forward in year 2, in fact you could say by looking at the Defensive & Offensive metrics we were one of the most improved teams in all of D1, which is great, but we still have a long ways to go due to our starting point being so far behind our standards/expectations.
We all see the limitations of this team, they are pretty obvious actually. However even so, we were a missed goal-line PI away from beating Texas, and a crazy fumble away from beating Texas Tech, both of those games we should have won, so only looking at Wins/Losses for last year is not a fair assessment of progress. That said, and considering we are a year older with many returning players, what are your realistic expectations this year? While we are still a few years away from being where we want to be, Year 3 we should see another level of progress being made. While we did lose two critical back-end pieces to our Defense, and Darious, if our Defense can manage to make subtle improvements, that will be ok for me. Honestly, our offense is where I want to see the most improvement.
Considering we still have Doege, and an inexperienced but talent 2nd string in Greene, I think offensive creativity is something I hope to see. Obviously coaches have to work with what they have, which limits scheme creativity or application, Doege while serviceable, should manage to make progress too. Sparrow & Mathis also need to make progress, they will need to be contributors this year at some point, but it all starts with our OL.
From an OL perspective, I was a bit disappointed to not see more Zone Stretch schemes to help our young OL last year. From a blocking scheme perspective, id like to see more versatility or a broader range of applications, to be less predictive, which has been a serious issue the past two years. Our WR's have hopefully solved their butterfingers issues, cause it was a significant issue last year, not only the amount of drops, but when they occurred, it always seemed like it was a critical 3rd down.
Overall, our defense can make subtle improvements and/or be as good as they were last year, this year its up to our Offense to show significant progress to begin to be able to compete against higher caliber teams. Even if they do, we will still be a couple years away before Brown has that "Breakout Year". I think our 2020 & 2021 classes has a lot of potential, if Brown can fill a few critical holes via transfer/JUCO, when these classes are developed & experienced this is when I think we will begin to see the fruits of Brown's vision, as how he choose to build this program was the right way, its a long-term plan that requires patience and not sacrificing long term growth to grab every decent JUCO player possible simply to hit 7 wins. While these players are talented, they still require time to develop & grow into the player they will become, which requires 2-3 years. WVU is not a Blueblood that can get a program full of freshmen & sophmore bluechips and win like Bama, Clemson, OSU, etc... WVU has always been a team that typically needed experienced upperclassmen to compete at high levels.
While I hope we see another year of progress like we did last year, we will still be limited until we have a diverse & consistent QB that can lead this team down the field in critical moments, a versatile & consistent OL, WR's who can win 1vs1 and have high catch %'s, RBs who can get that first down when needed & hit that big play to secure a win, a Defense that can shut down an opponents momentum, that forces bad decisions & FGs. While NB wants to play a team game, meaning control ToP to help his Defense, this doesnt mean you cant be explosive or creative either. Im super excited NB hired Kirk C as an analyst, a quality & experienced OC that will surely help bring new ideas to our staff, hopefully we hire him in a more long term role next year, but in any case he'll still provide new ideas & concepts to our staff.
This year is going to come down to:
1. Can our Defense maintain the same level this year, or make subtle improvements.
2. Can our Offense reduce last year's limitations & predictability.
Keep in mind, it took Rich Rod & Dabo both 5 years...... 5 YEARS before they won their first major bowl game. Dabo also inherited a much better program who naturally recruited far better then WVU on average, so his starting point was much better. Brown is building this team the right way, its a slow process that requires patience, but everything of real & lasting value requires time. So just because "ITS YEAR 3" doesnt mean we should play in the Big12 Championship. As long as Brown continues to recruit well, we have to give those players time to develop. Patience is not a strong suit of fans who are emotionally child like, who are outraged we lost a game at the last second, but fail to see the progress in the year prior the same team beat us by 30. The level of improvement we seek within this program does not happen quickly, its a 4-6 year process.. My point, temper your expectations for this year and dont apply any meaning to "BUT ITS YEAR 3"...
I don't think that can be done here.
Lol...she should have taught you to spell apparently. What does medoiocre mean? Sounds like a prehistoric lizard. Do remember them from your youth? And where the hell is Mononongah? That sounds like it may be near Apache Junction. By the way mediocre translates into...average. Kansas in case you haven't noticed has been not average but bad...except when they played WVU. Final thought...posts like this one make you look as foolish as a water boy on a high school football team.
You can more hilarious with each post particularly when your mistakes back you against the wall. Too funny.SORRY, YOU GOT IT WRONG AGAIN.
ABYSMAL
MEDIOCRE
AVERAGE
GOOD
EXCELLENT
GREAT
IN THAT ORDER!
Yes for about a three year cycle at best. It can not be done over a long period. You reinforced my opinion with the examples you used.Couldn't be done at Iowa State either. Baylor is a train wreck and TCU is smaller than Marshall with overwhelming competition for recruits. It can be done.
This team has no chance at ten wins with either QB.Very well stated, but I disagree with two of your observations. WVU was a blatant non call for pass interference at the goal line that created the Texas loss. The receiver wasn't just interfered with, he was mugged like the defender had to do. Two of the canceled games were indeed Mulligans against bottom dwellers regardless of their glorious past. That makes a very possible 9 win season which although not guaranteed, very likely.
Clemson was not exactly tearing up the ACC when Coach Tommy Bowden resigned 6 games into the season, with losses to both Maryland and Wake Forest and a 3-3 record. As a matter of fact they had been a middle of the road ACC team ending several seasons with a loss to Steve Spurrier and South Carolina. Clemson was Dabo Swinney's first head coaching job. He had a tough hill to climb also. But despite his inexperience at the Xs and Os, Dabo could recruit the Jimmys and Joes. Many of them did not come from SC.
I think we either win 9 or 10 games this season with Garret Greene the QB after game 3. Doege cannot and will not take a hit.
8-4 is good for WVU. Bad for Ohio State, Alabama, and Clemson.8-4 IS MEDIOCRE IS NONSENSE. I KNOW YOU'RE TRYING TO BE FUNNY. BUT YOU'RE NOT.
SORRY, YOU GOT IT WRONG AGAIN.
ABYSMAL
MEDIOCRE
AVERAGE
GOOD
EXCELLENT
GREAT
IN THAT ORDER!
8-4 is good for WVU. Bad for Ohio State, Alabama, and Clemson.
Lol....but...do you know what it is?CAN'T ARGUE WITH THAT BECAUSE I NEVER DISPUTE THE TRUTH. MORE POSTERS SHOULD TRY IT.
Lol....but...do you know what it is?
So you were an "editor " for your whole time in journalism? Wow. I thought I read that you were a sportswriter...and a general assignment reporter...a financial department innovator...and a investigative journalist. I'll have to reread your old posts to see how I missed it. Did you run the presses and drive the delivery trucks too? Must have never gone home.OF COURSE. I'M AN EXPERT ON FERRETING THE TRUTH. 43 YEARS AS A NEWSPAPER EDITOR TAUGHT ME THAT.
So you were an "editor " for your whole time in journalism? Wow. I thought I read that you were a sportswriter...and a general assignment reporter...a financial department innovator...and a investigative journalist. I'll have to reread your old posts to see how I missed it. Did you run the presses and drive the delivery trucks too? Must have never gone home.
It's been a long time since truth has even been an objective of nearly all media, print, broadcast or internet. Now it seems sensationalism and attention grabbing titles are the norm. The truth is whatever the publisher says it is and the editor is expected to 'correct' articles to ensure that they reflect the owner's political values.OF COURSE. I'M AN EXPERT ON FERRETING THE TRUTH. 43 YEARS AS A NEWSPAPER EDITOR TAUGHT ME THAT.
Excellent process for analyzing talent and potential...did long winded Volatility really write that about a coach with a losing record in the Fake 12 team conference.. and a .500 record overall. Of course Volly admits that he isn't finished with his free fan forum expert evaluation. So dumb.