Takes one to know one you pussy. Go away...we used to beat up punks like you before I found Jesus.
Do any deniers care about the Federal report on Climate Change?
- Thread starter Boomboom521
- Start date
Takes one to know one you pussy. Go away...we used to beat up punks like you before I found Jesus.
You're asking why I'm so racist after insisting I couldn't possibly be Black? STFU
If you know enough to threaten repeatedly that you can dox him and put him to his wife about affairs, you’d know for certain he was or wasn’t black.
Two points. 1. You’re a lying pussy. 2. Your motivation for threatening him is because he’s a conservative black man. Racist.
Youre a good guy Mule. He’s been dangling bait all thread, he’s not looking for explanation.
he seems like a real asshole, but is this the forum for these personal attacks?
Last edited:
Yes, yes we did. We were 15%, second behind only China, in 2015. What do you think we were in 1950. JFC
Here's all you need to know about him (from this thread)
@CpEER never got his question answered and never got a response.
Is there any need to listen to anything else this empty suit has to say?
Boomer may be correct. However my entire strategy throughout this thread was to prove one of two hypothesis using simple logic:
1) Leftist's arguments for "climate change" are logically & incoherently inconsistent with either its argued causes or remedies.
2) The calls for cures provide no real solutions to the problems due to human inability to control the causes or Leftist refusals to acknowledge inherent flaws in either the prescriptions or the analysis of the phenomenon claimed to be caused solely and exclusively by humans.
So all of my questions were directed at attempts to force any one of you who believe in man made "climate change" or "global warming" to argue consistently & logically with well laid out facts & data either #1 or #2? None of you did (or can)
So boomer is correct.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
If 1 is "nonsense" nothing in the thread
demonstrated it and if 2 requires "balance" nothing in the thread was presented indicating what that is or how it's achieved?
I think you just gave up the gig, claiming he has friends.
Last edited by a moderator:
What was presented as proof of man-made climate change and what was offered as balance to prevent human-caused man-made global warming?
It's too comical how you Leftists take a fabricated meme and run with it
..treating it as if it's codified fact.
That wimp noodle linguini spined panty wearing metrosexual has NEVER once presented any factual claims about his supposed "information" on the number of hoes I've disposed of. He was askesd specifically by @CpEER what his ongoing meme is all about and rather than lay out his case for his fellow Leftist star traveller, he wimped out like a Gay guy asked to entertain a couple of smokin' hot MILFs.
Why anybody takes that guy seriously is beyond comical, it's mildy scary.
Last edited:
CO2 admissions how they coincide with levels in the atmosphere- how those levels have been affected since industrialization and massive deforestation- and how those levels can be dropped into a more balanced makeup in the atmosphere
It’s the basic scientific analysis of climate change, and if you only tried to understand it without all that rightwing rage clouding your logic, you’d realize that there has been consistent arguments of cause and solution for decades now. So yeah, #1 and your entire fishing expedition in this thread is nonsense, and reveals how deluded and warped your mind really is at this point.
You were asked to provide data proving your analysis or hypothesis and you either refused because you could not or cannot. The fact remains the scientific data on man-made climate change is inconsistent and has been since measurements have been taken. There is no scientific consensus on the phenomenon whether it is man-made or simply naturally occurring? Now those are simply the facts and denying them means that you are a "fact denier".
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
http://www.hvonstorch.de/klima/pdf/CliSci2013.pdfYou were asked to provide data proving your analysis or hypothesis and you either refused because you could not or cannot. The fact remains the scientific data on man-made climate change is inconsistent and has been since measurements have been taken. There is no scientific consensus on the phenomenon whether it is man-made or simply naturally occurring? Now those are simply the facts and denying them means that you are a "fact denier".
Are you claiming a “consensus” in your mind is absolute 100% agreement from all scientists?
You were asked to provide data proving your analysis or hypothesis and you either refused because you could not or cannot. The fact remains the scientific data on man-made climate change is inconsistent and has been since measurements have been taken. There is no scientific consensus on the phenomenon whether it is man-made or simply naturally occurring? Now those are simply the facts and denying them means that you are a "fact denier".
It is a fact the Sun is our primary planetary heat source. Not humans. There is a consensus among scientists about that scientific fact. There is no consensus among scientists on whether humans are causing any global warming beyond what the sun scientifically has provided as measured by the data.
Nor is there any scientific consensus that man is providing planetary warming beyond that which the sun provides. Once again you were asked to provide data proving conclusively that man-made global warming has superseded that which has been provided by the Sun through the measured years. You did not provide that data.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/art...-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many
Excerpt
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50 per cent) of the post-1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. But it does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, so we do not know how many experts agree with it. And the statement, even if true, does not imply that we face a crisis requiring massive restructuring of the worldwide economy"
Opinion, not scientific fact. The Earth rotates around the Sun and changes its axis along that path which causes seasonal changes in both climate and temperatures and humans have zero control over that.
Scientific Fact not opinion.
Hey boomer yes or no?
If humans are capable of "changing" the earth's climate are we capable of actually creating one?
Yes or No?
Do you lay under a blanket at night? If so, you should understand the argument they are trying to make. But, of course, Trump says to believe him and his ideas and you do.....
Wimped out? Hardly. You were exposed as being racist, though. Shame. My "lilly white butt" will be just fine.
My brother......never ending in your fight for truth and justice while bitch slapping liberals along the way....keep on keeping onFrom now on, I'm just going to ignore these posts from you about my Wife, my mistresses, my infidelity & my Sexual Life in general because last night when @CpEER honestly asked you to explain what it was all about you punked out on him like Pitt fans do at our games. You're all talk, and you had a perfect chance to lay out for him in specified chronological detail your case on me and instead your lilly white tight ass sealed shut tighter than a maggot infested, long haired, dope smoking, loafer wearing hippie walking down the middle of the street in Compton Cali afraid he gonna get jacked or booty whacked by one of the homies!
You're such a lame ass
.
Hey boomer True or False?
The Earth's rotation on its axis around the Sun has more impact on our daily and yearly Global temperature changes than human activity on the planet.
True or False?
Are we back to talking about man generated heat instead of how much of that heat is being held in by the atmosphere? Boom posted data about the rise in carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, you know, the one we can't impact according to you. You said you read about the greenhouse effect, so I fail to see how you are asking the same stuff.
I linked an article surveying contributors to the IPCC and non contributors to the IPCC
my my aren't we sensitive today......somebody struck a nerve....and you have some nerve calling ANYONE racist
Humans don't generate heat mule. If carbon dioxide Left Behind after the sun has heated the Earth is causing the warming that's not man-made because humans don't make CO2 either! It's a byproduct. Naturally occurring.
