ADVERTISEMENT

Here's how to respond when Leftists say "the 2020 election WAS NOT stolen"

atlkvb

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
Jul 9, 2004
75,232
40,600
698
There is almost no subject the left won’t lie about. Whether it’s denying basic biology or fabricating “bloodbath” hoaxes about their top Republican rival, no topic is off limits for the Democrat “disinformation” police — and that includes elections. Since the 2020 election, Democrats and their media allies have worked overtime to smear Americans concerned about the integrity of U.S. elections. No matter how legitimate these concerns may be, the left slanders anyone who challenges controversial elections won by Democrats as so-called “election deniers.”

Putting aside the fact that Democrats have questioned elections they don’t win (see the Trump-Russia collusion hoax), it’s important to highlight that the left regularly lies about America’s elections to further their party’s goal of acquiring and maintaining government power. In service of this goal, no falsehood is too great.

Here are the 10 biggest lies Democrats tell about U.S. elections so you can identify and combat these mistruths.

A few excerpts:

2. The 2020 Election Was the ‘Most Secure in American History’​

This claim from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — the “nerve center” of the federal government’s censorship operations — is just as inaccurate today as the day it was issued nearly four years ago.

From illegal election rule changes in Michigan and Pennsylvania to the unauthorized use of ballot drop boxes in Wisconsin, the 2020 election was fraught with mischief and irregularities. In unprecedented fashion, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg poured hundreds of millions of dollars into left-wing nonprofits, which funneled most of these “Zuckerbucks” into election offices in Democrat-majority localities to push Democrat-backed voting policies and get-out-the-vote efforts.

3. Voter Fraud Doesn’t Exist​

When it comes to defending the chaotic and irregular 2020 election, legacy media have adopted the strategy of pretending that voter fraud never happened. But recent cases of such illegalities show that isn’t true.

5. Ranked-Choice Voting Is ‘Fair’​

Often referred to as “rigged-choice voting” by its critics, ranked-choice voting (RCV) is a system whereby voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first round of voting, the last-place finisher is eliminated, and his votes are reallocated to the voter’s second-choice candidate. This process continues until one candidate receives a majority of votes.

An excellent read...get the whole list and how to respond to the Left's cheating lies here:
link
 
Last edited:
And just think, if the election wasn’t stolen, why will they not allow it to be investigated and verified? Why won’t a judge hear it when people have come forward with evidence?

I say it all the time, are we supposed to believe Biden got more black votes than the first black president Obama?
 
And just think, if the election wasn’t stolen, why will they not allow it to be investigated and verified? Why won’t a judge hear it when people have come forward with evidence?

I say it all the time, are we supposed to believe Biden got more black votes than the first black president Obama?
They dismissed sworn affidavits, and we've never been given the exact reasons why all those vote counts in the key swing States were shut down almost simultaneously with Trump well ahead in all of them! Here in Georgia, there was no "water main break" as we were initially told. The fact is there was massive voter fraud and the media and Left knows it, that's why they've been determined to shut down any investigations into it and they immediately smear anyone who questions the results as "election deniers"
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePunish-EER
but there was Russian collusion...

=============================

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2015/04/24 › cash-flowed-t..

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium ...​



Apr 23, 2015 — As the Russian atomic energy agency gradually took charge of a company that controls one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the ...

============================

NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › just

Russia probe witness charged with funneling millions to ...​



Dec 4, 2019 — George Nader allegedly funneled $3.5 million in illegal contributions to Clinton campaign committees.

==========================

AP News
https://apnews.com › article

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine​



Mar 31, 2022 — Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113000 to settle a Federal Election ...

=============================


The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com › world › 2017/10/24

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia ...​



Oct 24, 2017 — After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
And just think, if the election wasn’t stolen, why will they not allow it to be investigated and verified? Why won’t a judge hear it when people have come forward with evidence?

I say it all the time, are we supposed to believe Biden got more black votes than the first black president Obama?
Every state has laws that prohibit the dissemination of "confidential" election information. Almost every challenge to the election was dismissed based on insufficient evidence or a lack of standing.

Our politicians have a pretty convenient racket to pass laws that prohibit the public from ever obtaining the information necessary to question our elections.
 
Every state has laws that prohibit the dissemination of "confidential" election information. Almost every challenge to the election was dismissed based on insufficient evidence or a lack of standing.

Our politicians have a pretty convenient racket to pass laws that prohibit the public from ever obtaining the information necessary to question our elections.
Agree .... way to many people going to school to be politicians ....lawyers.... we need some community College people who had to work their way through and run business and worked in the real world . People who made mistakes and come back from it , not those born into it . I don't mind some folks born rich and went to ivy league we need those as well
 
Every state has laws that prohibit the dissemination of "confidential" election information. Almost every challenge to the election was dismissed based on insufficient evidence or a lack of standing.

Our politicians have a pretty convenient racket to pass laws that prohibit the public from ever obtaining the information necessary to question our elections.
Yes, you are correct. However, I believe these challenges were at the state levels. And judges there refused to hear it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Yes, you are correct. However, I believe these challenges were at the state levels. And judges there refused to hear it.
In many of the cases, they claimed the filings had no "standing" so they refused to even hear the evidence. The cases were dismissed without any formal ruling on the veracity of the complaints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePunish-EER
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT