I’ve read the Forbes article, and the following two paragraphs are directly from that article:
In fact, even if we include the rare, very large volcanic eruptions, like 1980′s Mount St. Helens or 1991′s Mount Pinatubo eruption, they only emitted 10 and 50 million tons of CO2 each, respectively. It would take three Mount St. Helens and one Mount Pinatubo eruption every day to equal the amount that humanity is presently emitting.
If not for the influence of humans, the climate and carbon dioxide concentrations would be stable. Rising CO2 is a problem that we’re actively causing, and if we want to fix it, that’s up to us, too
Did you read the article you posted?
Yes I read them both and the point I wanted you to see is that even adding all of that non man made CO2 from those volcano eruptions, overall global temps went down.
Why does that not impress you what a farce the whole issue is? Even with those volcanos adding to what we produce, there was no global warming and the articles spelled out why. You just skipped over that part.