So I have to wonder - how many on here are ready to cleanse the name of Robert C Byrd from the history of WV?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the bigger issue was letting his troops kidnap blacks into slavery.Yea...I heard he once refused to open a door for his wife.
Why? Byrd acknowledged what he did wrong and worked to make up for his mistakes. Plus, he was never a traitor.So I have to wonder - how many on here are ready to cleanse the name of Robert C Byrd from the history of WV?
I can't stand Byrd, for many reasons.So I have to wonder - how many on here are ready to cleanse the name of Robert C Byrd from the history of WV?
He was a member...no wait a leader of a terror organization. A simple apology makes up for that?Why? Byrd acknowledged what he did wrong and worked to make up for his mistakes. Plus, he was never a traitor.
He was a member...no wait a leader of a terror organization. A simple apology makes up for that?
Supposedly after the war, Lee argued for reconciliation...at Washington and Lee he expelled white students that were violent towards black men...he was instrumental in efforts to set-up state-funded schools for black students. There may be more, but do these efforts not equate to something?
Byrd was a leader in a terror organization...he apologized after being a part of it...now all is good. Okay I got it...it's that simple.After the war Lee argued for reconciliation? Note the phrase "after the war." He didn't have much choice after the war. When he did have a choice he argued for (and led the army that fought for) separation from the US.
I think it's kinda dumb to have so many things in WV named after Byrd and considering there are lots of people that would happily become a US Senator and wield power I wouldn't mind if being a former KKKer de facto disqualified you from becoming a Senator (it certainly would today but not back then) but all that said what Byrd did wasn't in the same ballpark as what Lee did.
Yes....I was being sarcastic.I think the bigger issue was letting his troops kidnap blacks into slavery.
Byrd was a leader in a terror organization...he apologized after being a part of it...now all is good. Okay I got it...it's that simple.
After the war Lee argued for reconciliation? Note the phrase "after the war." He didn't have much choice after the war. When he did have a choice he argued for (and led the army that fought for) separation from the US.
Kinda like ISIS and Al Qaeda in Qatar?I didn't say all was good. But to be accurate, the group Byrd was a leader of was less vile and much smaller than the one Lee was a leader of.
NO HE DID NOT! When will you people learn?
Lee was not in favor of succession.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/So Lee was not in favor of secession and yet he led the Confederate Army in its efforts to secede from the US? If so, then Lee was a moron.
NO HE DID NOT! When will you people learn?
Lee was not in favor of succession.
Total bullshit. I am a conservative - registered Republican. Most - not all - that I associate with are conservative - registered Republican, and none are in the least bit concerned with slavery. It is not relevant to anyone's life today. Never an item that would or should be discussed.You forgot one.
3) The Republicans of today want to honor the slave-holders that the Republicans of the 1860s fought the Civil War against.
Total bullshit. I am a conservative - registered Republican. Most - not all - that I associate with are conservative - registered Republican, and none are in the least bit concerned with slavery. It is not relevant to anyone's life today. Never an item that would or should be discussed.
You obviously don't know any Republicans. Do you really know anyone who possesses the beliefs you are blaming on modern people?
Earlier post you were into slavery and even stated it would still be in existence if South had been victorious. And, I don't see any reason to think we would be substantially different than we are today with representatives be same -- with different name.I'm not talking about slavery per se, I'm talking about the people those monuments honor. Who wants to leave them up and who wants to take them down?