Israel bombing back
- Thread starter indyrckstar
- Start date
i may have missed it (and forgive me if i did), but did you post and express such lamentations after the October 7th Massacre or after Iran fired 300 drones and missiles at Israel recently? Or is it only after Israel does something that you feel war is horrible?
Seems like both sides tried to limit damage to save face.
Post and/or discuss before, during, and after.
As you quoted me, it should have been obvious that I didn't direct the comments towards Israel.
Nah. I just keep it real. Hence, calling out Hamas (search my username if you feel the doubt still), Israel IDF, USA, AIPAC, etc... Being consistent is easy. Watching people get butt hurt on here is also easy....
Unreported was that shots were fired towards Israel before Israel launched this morning. They were quietly intercepted.
no need for another thread but thuoght this was interesting curious on its accuracy
indianexpress.com
Cost and benefit: Israel’s very expensive defence against aerial threats
Experts have calculated the cost of the April 13 attack for Iran at $100-$200 million — perhaps five to ten times less than what Israel spent to repel it. That means a huge recurring bill if Iran were to keep attacking. Here’s the math.
indianexpress.com
If they were intercepted, that's a 100% good thing for Israel and human lives.
Still wanting de-escalate then the current recent pathway.
The Land of Israel
The Hebrew Bible provides three specific sets of borders for the "Promised Land", each with a different purpose. Neither of the terms "Promised Land" (Ha'Aretz HaMuvtahat) or "Land of Israel" are used in these passages: Genesis 15:13–21, Genesis 17:8[21] and Ezekiel 47:13–20 use the term "the land" (ha'aretz), as does Deuteronomy 1:8 in which it is promised explicitly to "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob... and to their descendants after them," whilst Numbers 34:1–15 describes the "Land of Canaan" (Eretz Kna'an) which is allocated to nine and half of the twelve Israelite tribes after the Exodus. The expression "Land of Israel" is first used in a later book, 1 Samuel 13:19. It is defined in detail in the exilic Book of Ezekiel as a land where both the twelve tribes and the "strangers in (their) midst", can claim inheritance.[22] The name "Israel" first appears in the Hebrew Bible as the name given by God to the patriarch Jacob (Genesis 32:28). Deriving from the name "Israel", other designations that came to be associated with the Jewish people have included the "Children of Israel" or "Israelite".
The term 'Land of Israel' (γῆ Ἰσραήλ) occurs in one episode in the New Testament (Matthew 2:20–21), where, according to Shlomo Sand, it bears the unusual sense of 'the area surrounding Jerusalem'.[21] The section in which it appears was written as a parallel to the earlier Book of Exodus.[23]
Source:
A Biblical review of the land of Israel
Translation: "Squatter's rights for the Jews"
The Hebrew Bible provides three specific sets of borders for the "Promised Land", each with a different purpose. Neither of the terms "Promised Land" (Ha'Aretz HaMuvtahat) or "Land of Israel" are used in these passages: Genesis 15:13–21, Genesis 17:8[21] and Ezekiel 47:13–20 use the term "the land" (ha'aretz), as does Deuteronomy 1:8 in which it is promised explicitly to "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob... and to their descendants after them," whilst Numbers 34:1–15 describes the "Land of Canaan" (Eretz Kna'an) which is allocated to nine and half of the twelve Israelite tribes after the Exodus. The expression "Land of Israel" is first used in a later book, 1 Samuel 13:19. It is defined in detail in the exilic Book of Ezekiel as a land where both the twelve tribes and the "strangers in (their) midst", can claim inheritance.[22] The name "Israel" first appears in the Hebrew Bible as the name given by God to the patriarch Jacob (Genesis 32:28). Deriving from the name "Israel", other designations that came to be associated with the Jewish people have included the "Children of Israel" or "Israelite".
The term 'Land of Israel' (γῆ Ἰσραήλ) occurs in one episode in the New Testament (Matthew 2:20–21), where, according to Shlomo Sand, it bears the unusual sense of 'the area surrounding Jerusalem'.[21] The section in which it appears was written as a parallel to the earlier Book of Exodus.[23]
Source:
A Biblical review of the land of Israel
Translation: "Squatter's rights for the Jews"
The Land of Israel
The Hebrew Bible provides three specific sets of borders for the "Promised Land", each with a different purpose. Neither of the terms "Promised Land" (Ha'Aretz HaMuvtahat) or "Land of Israel" are used in these passages: Genesis 15:13–21, Genesis 17:8[21] and Ezekiel 47:13–20 use the term "the land" (ha'aretz), as does Deuteronomy 1:8 in which it is promised explicitly to "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob... and to their descendants after them," whilst Numbers 34:1–15 describes the "Land of Canaan" (Eretz Kna'an) which is allocated to nine and half of the twelve Israelite tribes after the Exodus. The expression "Land of Israel" is first used in a later book, 1 Samuel 13:19. It is defined in detail in the exilic Book of Ezekiel as a land where both the twelve tribes and the "strangers in (their) midst", can claim inheritance.[22] The name "Israel" first appears in the Hebrew Bible as the name given by God to the patriarch Jacob (Genesis 32:28). Deriving from the name "Israel", other designations that came to be associated with the Jewish people have included the "Children of Israel" or "Israelite".
The term 'Land of Israel' (γῆ Ἰσραήλ) occurs in one episode in the New Testament (Matthew 2:20–21), where, according to Shlomo Sand, it bears the unusual sense of 'the area surrounding Jerusalem'.[21] The section in which it appears was written as a parallel to the earlier Book of Exodus.[23]
Source:
A Biblical review of the land of Israel
Translation: "Squatter's rights for the Jews"
imbecile /ĭm′bə-sĭl, -səl/
noun
A person who is considered foolish or stupid.
A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under supervision. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive.
One destitute of strength; esp., one of feeble mind;
imbecile /ĭm′bə-sĭl, -səl/
noun
A person who is considered foolish or stupid.
A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under supervision. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive.
One destitute of strength; esp., one of feeble mind;
Yea, I mean they should definitely just keep on turning the other cheek against a people who’ve sworn to kill every last one of them. Should probably disarm and disband the military. I’m sure it’ll work out just fine.
This is the essential misunderstanding the Israeli protestors and Palestinian sympathizers simply do not grasp! It is practically impossible to negotiate or co-exist with someone who is sworn to your destruction.
How is that done?
You could just go kill more children. You bragged about it since they are "Arabs".....
This is the essential misunderstanding the Israeli protestors and Palestinian sympathizers simply do not grasp! It is practically impossible to negotiate or co-exist with someone who is sworn to your destruction.
How is that done?
The ultimately ironic plight of the so called "Palestinian people" is among all the Arab lands that surround Israel, none of them want the Palestinians. Not even the sponsors of terrorists attacks against Israel (like Iran) are willing to take Palestinians in and give them a home among their Arab brothers. No one.
Sad.
@DvlDog4WVU
You ever going to call out Israel selling real estate?
You ever going to call out AIPAC corruption within our government?
You ever going to call out US sending billions of dollars without any conditions?
Or stick the same repetitive questions that has been answered multiple times such as your favorite below...
Does Israel have the right to defend themselves? How would I go about it?
You ever going to call out Israel selling real estate?
You ever going to call out AIPAC corruption within our government?
You ever going to call out US sending billions of dollars without any conditions?
Or stick the same repetitive questions that has been answered multiple times such as your favorite below...
Does Israel have the right to defend themselves? How would I go about it?
To be fair, you could hop a flight over to Ben-Gurion. Flights go there every day.
Take some food, medicine, etc. with you on your check-on luggage. Show us you really believe what you type. Maybe even pick up a rusty ol' AK while over there, being a weekend (keyboard?) warrior surely you can train a few Hamas "freedom fighters".
I'll put my bet on the Hebrews.
I think what you are missing is this- neither are they inclined to come to their defense. The Palestinians are just a useful tool to the Arab world, someone to do their proxy work.
That land will be fought over until Christ returns, indeed the world will divide over it! However, there will be only one ultimate inhabitant who has been given the right to call it home forever. That will be both in this world, and the new Kingdom to come.
Still can't debate the issues, huh?
I'm willing to debate the issues without making YOU look bad - you do that well enough as it is. You game?
That's also true, and again very sad for those poor people. They are simply pawns in a great Religious struggle, and they're blaming the wrong people for their desperate plight!
I’m quite certain that I didn’t, but collateral damage does happen. If you took the story about the family of 4 getting stitched by 7.62 as bragging, you misunderstood the point of why I said it.
You’re aware we send money to Palestine as well, right? You’re aware that we send money to close to 100 nations and DoS has very little accountability into how it’s spent, right? Or put another way, we don’t put conditions on it. You’re also aware, much of the money we send to other nations funnels back to US businesses, right?
As for calling out AIPAC, they’re no different than any other PAC. I can’t stand PACs. I said CU was the worst ruling of my lifetime by SCOTUS.
Don’t really have an opinion on selling the land, it’s not something I’ve looked into. The settlement process I’ve never really been a fan of, and I assume it’s similar to that. Like a lot of your arguments though, I assume there is more to the story than through the grievance lens of distortion and emotional rhetoric.
Sorry, the answer was eight. But if four is all you have to work with do the best you can with it. I'm sure the disappointment from your coming up short time and again carries over into every aspect of your life.
Ahhh, I think I made him cry again.
Pretty much ruined this thread for you, didn't I?
Feel free to make another. You make an easy mark.
Pretty much ruined this thread for you, didn't I?
Feel free to make another. You make an easy mark.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Who, ultimately, is behind the implementation of the state-outline field
- Latest: MountaineerGuy