We were promised evidence of Trumps collusion the the Russians
- Thread starter dave
- Start date
shout out to @countryroads89
Damn countryroads89... I've been gone all summer and when I come back this is how you greeted me?:
quote from post #94 of this thread
countryroads89 wrote:
"You have to be either one of the most naive or dumb people I have ever met. I feel sorry for you. Your political slant blinds you to perceiving the truth and grasp basic facts''.
Just damn!
OK, so feeling perfectly humiliated by your obvious mental alacrity towards me I responded graciously by giving you both your assumption of me and your bold prediction back in March stating that within a few months...we would all know how Trump "colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary.
Here's what you said:
post #28 of this thread March 20, 2017
countryroads89 wrote:
bornaneer said: ↑
"What is meddling or collusion in an election"?
countryroads89 said:
"Just sit tight; you will find out in a couple of months".
So I weighed in a few days ago asking for your expertise, since you are now standing by your "prediction" of our realization of the Trump/Russian collusion as we sit in here in September.
In fact you wrote in post #51 of this thread:
"You guys are so dumb it's entertaining. It's like a Three Stooges movie (dave, atl and patx)."
and you wrote in post #58 of this thread:
"The only "people" is you and you can't even cite sources to back up your claims. Practically every post you make has no substance to back it up."
...AND you wrote in post #94 of this thread:
"And my prediction was true; we know all kinds of shit on these dirty corrupt bastards."
So I came back and graciously accepted ALL of your arguments,assumptions, and even derisive comments about my mental capacity (you hurt my feelings so much country!)
I offered a challenge to you in post #96 of this thread and again in post #97 of this thread and went even further in post #106 of this thread...asking you to explain it all to me:
atlkvb wrote:
"given what you can reconstruct based on our known or proven Trump malfeasance and trickery, apply this information to explain how it all changed votes from Hillary to Trump?"
Again country...I assumed ALL of your positions. I gave you ALL of your predictions. I even accepted your pejorative assertion that I'm naive and dumb about all of this!
I simply asked you to show me how Trump"'colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary? Explain it all to me. Run it!
In Sports parlance I gave you a "freebie" countryroads89. I spotted you 4 touchdowns and dared you to cover the spread.
We're playing h-o-r-s-e and I gave you the h-o-r-s...
only asking you to make one basket to beat me.
This was WVU v Delaware State, and I'm not even trying!
All I wanted you to do was lay it all out for me, explain to me because I'm so "dumb" how easily you see Trump "colluded" with the Russians (based on what your predictions revealed) to steal this past election?
You've punked out on me and my gracious challenge countryroads89, like Marshall players running away from a good fight...like Pitt fans running away from a good slaughter, like Socialist Liberals run away from the Truth!
I gave you a lay up to not only back your claims of my naive stupidity, but once and for all educate the rest of us unwashed "mouth breathers" on the Right how absolutely deceitful Trump was stealing this election from the most qualified, honest, trustworthy, competent, all everything candidate this nation has ever offered for its Presidency!
You've been silent. Not a word. Not even a suggestion to reveal your expert handle on this whole affair following your bold "prediction" back in March that we'd all soon see it.
I'm very disappointed in you @countryroads89. I thought you had more to show me? I thought you could back up your claims. I thought you knew your sh*t, as much of it as you talk to @dave, calling him a liar, or @TarHeelEer, or @WVPATX , or even me calling us all "stooges".
I offered you a fight you could not lose, spotted you points, even agreed to your assumptions, and asked for your Wisdom so I can come up to your level and you let me down. You've failed me countryroads89!
Nothing but silence from you...crickets even on my challenge!
Just Damn.
At least @Boomboom521 attempted to answer me when he linked me to an article that at least outlined the board parameters of Trump's possible dalliance with the Russians in post #108 of this thread. But poor boomer's efforts while admirable, easily missed the mark as you can read for yourself in post #131 of this thread. But at least he tried. Way to go boom!
What's your excuse @countryroads89?
Why are you ignoring me? Why haven't you explained it all to this board for our benefit?
The next time you call me "dumb" or "naive" after all I've laid out for you in this thread, it's going to be met with this:
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Damn countryroads89... I've been gone all summer and when I come back this is how you greeted me?:
quote from post #94 of this thread
countryroads89 wrote:
"You have to be either one of the most naive or dumb people I have ever met. I feel sorry for you. Your political slant blinds you to perceiving the truth and grasp basic facts''.
Just damn!
OK, so feeling perfectly humiliated by your obvious mental alacrity towards me I responded graciously by giving you both your assumption of me and your bold prediction back in March stating that within a few months...we would all know how Trump "colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary.
Here's what you said:
post #28 of this thread March 20, 2017
countryroads89 wrote:
bornaneer said: ↑
"What is meddling or collusion in an election"?
countryroads89 said:
"Just sit tight; you will find out in a couple of months".
So I weighed in a few days ago asking for your expertise, since you are now standing by your "prediction" of our realization of the Trump/Russian collusion as we sit in here in September.
In fact you wrote in post #51 of this thread:
"You guys are so dumb it's entertaining. It's like a Three Stooges movie (dave, atl and patx)."
and you wrote in post #58 of this thread:
"The only "people" is you and you can't even cite sources to back up your claims. Practically every post you make has no substance to back it up."
...AND you wrote in post #94 of this thread:
"And my prediction was true; we know all kinds of shit on these dirty corrupt bastards."
So I came back and graciously accepted ALL of your arguments,assumptions, and even derisive comments about my mental capacity (you hurt my feelings so much country!)
I offered a challenge to you in post #96 of this thread and again in post #97 of this thread and went even further in post #106 of this thread...asking you to explain it all to me:
atlkvb wrote:
"given what you can reconstruct based on our known or proven Trump malfeasance and trickery, apply this information to explain how it all changed votes from Hillary to Trump?"
Again country...I assumed ALL of your positions. I gave you ALL of your predictions. I even accepted your pejorative assertion that I'm naive and dumb about all of this!
I simply asked you to show me how Trump"'colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary? Explain it all to me. Run it!
In Sports parlance I gave you a "freebie" countryroads89. I spotted you 4 touchdowns and dared you to cover the spread.
We're playing h-o-r-s-e and I gave you the h-o-r-s...
only asking you to make one basket to beat me.
This was WVU v Delaware State, and I'm not even trying!
All I wanted you to do was lay it all out for me, explain to me because I'm so "dumb" how easily you see Trump "colluded" with the Russians (based on what your predictions revealed) to steal this past election?
You've punked out on me and my gracious challenge countryroads89, like Marshall players running away from a good fight...like Pitt fans running away from a good slaughter, like Socialist Liberals run away from the Truth!
I gave you a lay up to not only back your claims of my naive stupidity, but once and for all educate the rest of us unwashed "mouth breathers" on the Right how absolutely deceitful Trump was stealing this election from the most qualified, honest, trustworthy, competent, all everything candidate this nation has ever offered for its Presidency!
You've been silent. Not a word. Not even a suggestion to reveal your expert handle on this whole affair following your bold "prediction" back in March that we'd all soon see it.
I'm very disappointed in you @countryroads89. I thought you had more to show me? I thought you could back up your claims. I thought you knew your sh*t, as much of it as you talk to @dave, calling him a liar, or @TarHeelEer, or @WVPATX , or even me calling us all "stooges".
I offered you a fight you could not lose, spotted you points, even agreed to your assumptions, and asked for your Wisdom so I can come up to your level and you let me down. You've failed me countryroads89!
Nothing but silence from you...crickets even on my challenge!
Just Damn.
At least @Boomboom521 attempted to answer me when he linked me to an article that at least outlined the board parameters of Trump's possible dalliance with the Russians in post #108 of this thread. But poor boomer's efforts while admirable, easily missed the mark as you can read for yourself in post #131 of this thread. But at least he tried. Way to go boom!
What's your excuse @countryroads89?
Why are you ignoring me? Why haven't you explained it all to this board for our benefit?
The next time you call me "dumb" or "naive" after all I've laid out for you in this thread, it's going to be met with this:
Last edited:
I don't think your dumb. I do, however, think you are unbelievably pompous and dangerously stubborn (a character flaw I'm sure many in your personal life dread). I also think you are deceitful and almost all together fake in your presentation to others (of course this board being my only example). You mask yourself in this respectful, open, accepting American attitude, but underneath that carefully chosen strategy of demeanor lies a vicious, closed minded, and dangerous individual. Dangerous because it's those that pose as true citizens of the American mind and Christian heart that do the most damage to our society. Debate is healthy. Disagreement is necessary. Compromise is American. But your motivations are far more sinister.shout out to @countryroads89
Damn countryroads89... I've been gone all summer and when I come back this is how you greeted me?:
quote from post #94 of this thread
countryroads89 wrote:
"You have to be either one of the most naive or dumb people I have ever met. I feel sorry for you. Your political slant blinds you to perceiving the truth and grasp basic facts''.
Just damn!
OK, so feeling perfectly humiliated by your obvious mental alacrity towards me I responded graciously by giving you both your assumption of me and your bold prediction back in March stating that within a few months...we would all know how Trump "colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary.
Here's what you said:
post #28 of this thread March 20, 2017
countryroads89 wrote:
bornaneer said: ↑
"What is meddling or collusion in an election"?
countryroads89 said:
"Just sit tight; you will find out in a couple of months".
So I weighed in a few days ago asking for your expertise, since you are now standing by your "prediction" of our realization of the Trump/Russian collusion as we sit in here in September.
In fact you wrote in post #51 of this thread:
"You guys are so dumb it's entertaining. It's like a Three Stooges movie (dave, atl and patx)."
and you wrote in post #58 of this thread:
"The only "people" is you and you can't even cite sources to back up your claims. Practically every post you make has no substance to back it up."
...AND you wrote in post #94 of this thread:
"And my prediction was true; we know all kinds of shit on these dirty corrupt bastards."
So I came back and graciously accepted ALL of your arguments,assumptions, and even derisive comments about my mental capacity (you hurt my feelings so much country!)
I offered a challenge to you in post #96 of this thread and again in post #97 of this thread and went even further in post #106 of this thread...asking you to explain it all to me:
atlkvb wrote:
"given what you can reconstruct based on our known or proven Trump malfeasance and trickery, apply this information to explain how it all changed votes from Hillary to Trump?"
Again country...I assumed ALL of your positions. I gave you ALL of your predictions. I even accepted your pejorative assertion that I'm naive and dumb about all of this!
I simply asked you to show me how Trump"'colluded" with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary? Explain it all to me. Run it!
In Sports parlance I gave you a "freebie" countryroads89. I spotted you 4 touchdowns and dared you to cover the spread.
We're playing h-o-r-s-e and I gave you the h-o-r-s...
only asking you to make one basket to beat me.
This was WVU v Delaware State, and I'm not even trying!
All I wanted you to do was lay it all out for me, explain to me because I'm so "dumb" how easily you see Trump "colluded" with the Russians (based on what your predictions revealed) to steal this past election?
You've punked out on me and my gracious challenge countryroads89, like Marshall players running away from a good fight...like Pitt fans running away from a good slaughter, like Socialist Liberals run away from the Truth!
I gave you a lay up to not only back your claims of my naive stupidity, but once and for all educate the rest of us unwashed "mouth breathers" on the Right how absolutely deceitful Trump was stealing this election from the most qualified, honest, trustworthy, competent, all everything candidate this nation has ever offered for its Presidency!
You've been silent. Not a word. Not even a suggestion to reveal your expert handle on this whole affair following your bold "prediction" back in March that we'd all soon see it.
I'm very disappointed in you @countryroads89. I thought you had more to show me? I thought you could back up your claims. I thought you knew your sh*t, as much of it as you talk to @dave, calling him a liar, or @TarHeelEer, or @WVPATX , or even me calling us all "stooges".
I offered you a fight you could not lose, spotted you points, even agreed to your assumptions, and asked for your Wisdom so I can come up to your level and you let me down. You've failed me countryroads89!
Nothing but silence from you...crickets even on my challenge!
Just Damn.
At least @Boomboom521 attempted to answer me when he linked me to an article that at least outlined the board parameters of Trump's possible dalliance with the Russians in post #108 of this thread. But poor boomer's efforts while admirable, easily missed the mark as you can read for yourself in post #131 of this thread. But at least he tried. Way to go boom!
What's your excuse @countryroads89?
Why are you ignoring me? Why haven't you explained it all to this board for our benefit?
The next time you call me "dumb" or "naive" after all I've laid out for you in this thread, it's going to be met with this:
At least, there are those on this board (both sides) that show their nastiness up front, although bad for debate, at the point of connection they aren't faking it and that's something.
I actually try to be respectful boom, and you describing of me all that you have perfected and demonstrate expert proficiency in on a daily basis to members of this forum is simultaneously as ludicrous as it is comical.
Thank you for your contribution on my daily dissertations as well as my Life's portfolio.
@Boomboom521 I asked you earlier in this thread to simply explain to me how Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary...the death cry of the Left we've been hearing for the past 9 months.
You linked me to an article which on your opinion was a pretty good rundown of that, I read it, analyzed it and reported back to you with a paragraph by paragraph assessmemt of its mis application and inconsistency relative to the seriousness of the charge coming from the Left based on the facts as we know them.
I didn't insult you, I wasn't mean or nasty. Just factual asking for proof of what you both allege happened and presented as verifcation.
I don't know how you derived any sinister motives from our exchange on that, but I suppose when the facts aren't on your side you have to find some other way to lash out or make a different point that can't be as easily refuted.
Hence I'm nasty and stubborn.
OK.
You linked me to an article which on your opinion was a pretty good rundown of that, I read it, analyzed it and reported back to you with a paragraph by paragraph assessmemt of its mis application and inconsistency relative to the seriousness of the charge coming from the Left based on the facts as we know them.
I didn't insult you, I wasn't mean or nasty. Just factual asking for proof of what you both allege happened and presented as verifcation.
I don't know how you derived any sinister motives from our exchange on that, but I suppose when the facts aren't on your side you have to find some other way to lash out or make a different point that can't be as easily refuted.
Hence I'm nasty and stubborn.
OK.
Last edited:
@countryroads89 called me "dumb" and "naive" for not understanding after all this time how easy it is to see that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary.
It was the easiest layup to make for him/her to prove the point with me when I asked for him/her to lay out what Trump so obviously did that I was too dumb and naive to see right?
It was a stolen pass in the half court with no one under the basket, a pick six walk into the end zone, an open shot on goal into an empty net and @countryroads89 wouldn't take it, passed on the score, couldn't slam dunk on me and wave a finger shaking his/her head at me like Sagaba Konate does after swatting naive dumb opponents away.
So I'm simply sitting in the stands calling country out for being such a wuss, and @Boomboom521 calls me "nasty" and "stubborn".
All I'm doing is sitting in the cheap seats, dumb and naive as I am shaking my head like tisk...tisk...tisk.
Who doesn't at least take a cheap free shot to win?
@countryroads89.
Just damn.
Last edited:
I dont argue with them. I destroy their simpleton bullshit with facts and logic and then mock their stupid asses relentlessly.
So I gather boom that you'd prefer I engage you with insults instead of respect, name calling instead of factual exchange of ideas, and general nastiness to be more genuine instead of my fake appreciation of the common decency you deserve as a human being?
I'd be more believable if I were a loquacious forked tongued serpent spewing out hatred and vile neologisms?
Got it boom.
countryroads89 if I'm as "dumb" and "naive" as you claimed, how is it I'm smart and sophisticated enough to mute you?
What's that say about your mental dexterity or social awareness that a "dumb" and "naive" message board poster renders you speechless?
There are plenty on here that bash me daily, and I respect them and think about their posts. You are just FOS. It's not some valiant effort at community building, don't be self righteous. When I want to bash someone's opinion ****this post is an example**** I write what I think without cloaking it in sarcasm and calling it "respect".
You do it on all of your opinions basically. I enjoyed engaging you for two threads, before that "know it all" bs made me want to puke.
I do marvel at your surgical precision carving up the diseased carcasses known as Leftist sycophants.
OK, so tell me Mr. amorphous, why is it that you get to decide who is right and wrong?
What are your credentials holding the master card of intellectual king maker? If I'm that difficult to debate where you get so frustrated by my fiercely held opinions (which I'm perfectly comfortable arguing) why bother?
I'm always going to think I'm right, and you're NEVER going to agree with that correct boom?
@Boomboom521 (from this thread)
Is this an example of you being "open minded" boom and ready to accept facts as correct when presented to you? Or is this a case a case of me and @dave being "pompous"?
Tell us which it is boom?
Yet I'm the one who's "stubborn" and just plain mean, fake, or unwilling to admit whenever I'm wrong right boom?
Is this an example of you being "open minded" boom and ready to accept facts as correct when presented to you? Or is this a case a case of me and @dave being "pompous"?
Tell us which it is boom?
Yet I'm the one who's "stubborn" and just plain mean, fake, or unwilling to admit whenever I'm wrong right boom?
Last edited:
I won't address any more of your posts. You either aren't intelligent enough or honest enough to have an intelligent and meaningful discussion with. You simply fail to comprehend my very basic statements. In posts 171 of this thread you have accused me of asserting trump colluded with the Russsians. I never said that. I said trump jr has. Only time will tell if trump has. This investigation isn't over.
I won't address any more of your posts. You either aren't intelligent enough or honest enough to have an intelligent and meaningful discussion with. You simply fail to comprehend my very basic statements. In posts 171 of this thread you have accused me of asserting trump colluded with the Russsians. I never said that. I said trump jr has. Only time will tell if trump has. This investigation isn't over.
OK, then please stop calling me "dumb" or "unintelligent" because you don't have enough facts to back that up when you run and hide from engaging me like this
Last edited:
At the very beginning of this thread you predicted that we would all see how Trump indeed "colluded" with the Russians.
You made that statement back in March...I was calling you out on it a couple of days ago, asking you to back your assertion that your "predictions" had been verified.
I asked you to explain what you knew to this point, and you ran away from the thread like this:
In summary, cuntrytard cannot stand the heat so he has left the kitchen. What a bitch.I won't address any more of your posts. You either aren't intelligent enough or honest enough to have an intelligent and meaningful discussion with. You simply fail to comprehend my very basic statements. In posts 171 of this thread you have accused me of asserting trump colluded with the Russsians. I never said that. I said trump jr has. Only time will tell if trump has. This investigation isn't over.
I thought I'd try it again, I was wrong. I'm wrong a lot, right a lot too. You don't debate though chubbs. I'm sure you think you do.....tell you what though.....I just hope the same passion you have for tearing down those that think differently from you goes into your Christian efforts and your efforts as a father. And I'll respect that. Wish you the best, honestly. Good people come in all forms, and political ideology or spiritual philosophy doesn't define us as much as who we are at heart.
This post is an example of why you rub me the wrong way, and others like Dave - Paxxx - or Born do not. I don't even know what your point is.....because I don't agree that Clinton broke the law with intent, I'm stubborn? Even though I said I would welcome an investigation? And that (stated several times in this thread) I don't know if she broke the law with intent (or without intent), and if she did I wouldn't shed a tear for her?
Your biggest issue, imo, as a "debater".....you never debate a person and their opinions......you debate "the left". If we discuss religion/spirituality....you see me as you see everyone that doesn't praise Jesus .....as haters of Christianity and Christians. If it's homosexuality, then it's you versus the "leftist deviants". If it's education, then it's you versus the "leftist anti-Christian, American haters seeking to indoctrinate innocient kids".
Any issue, any discussion, it all comes down to you saving the world with your superior intellect and insight. Yet.....after you belittle those zombie minded leftists you "carve up" you have the nerve to act like you respect other people's opinions. It's annoying to me.
And this post boom is a good reason to suggest you describe to others what you are in fact yourself. No where in that law does it say anything about "intent" to be in violation of it. (I quoted the exact phrasing as Director Comey relayed it to Congress). He said nothing about "intent", nor does the statute. To be in violation of the law is to simply mishandle the classified information as Hillary did, and not take care to faithfully protect it as she also did not.
Both @dave and myself pointed that out to you after you said you are always willing to admit when you are wrong. You are wrong here yet you still refuse to accept it applying something into the law that is not there.
Then you call me stubborn.
Carry on boom.
You are just so wrong here boom.
With all due respect, it is YOU who never deviates from your "Religion" ie: Secular Humanism. I ALWAYS debate ideas and opinions, you just don't like it when mine don't agree with yours.
We debate right vs left here all the time. Trouble is folks on the Left don't like being placed there. They prefer to be called "progressive", which isn't Left or Right to them...it just IS. I says folks who advocate expansion of big Government are indeed Leftists....what is it that they advocate which doesn't call for more involvement of Government in our everyday lives?
No Thanks.
I don't see you as hating Christianity, but you reveal that yourself with every sharp and biting comment you make about people of Faith. I only see you as "lost" because you don't have a personal relationship with Christ and I Pray for you. If that makes you mad, who's problem is that boom? Christ himself said they hated him first, so anyone who Loves him should also expect to be hated. You don't surprise me on that.
On Homosexuality, we've debated that also...and all I've ever stood firm on is that it is not natural. OK we disagree on that, but so what? It either is natural or it is not. We each have our opinions on it, but just because I don't agree with yours I'm the one who has a problem?
On Education, you mischaracterize my position on it. I happen to think Government does a lousy job educating students. I think private schools do a better job. We disagree on that, but again why is it me who "hates" when I simply argue that private education is "better" and Religious based education that stresses morality and fidelity to our Creator which this nation's precepts are founded on is best?
I like you boom I respect your intellect (try to at least), and told you I wish we can have constructive dialouge. That usually doesn't happen though because you are the one who decends into name calling, pejorative assumptions based on negative assessments of my motives, and general disgust with me simply because I don't agree with you.
You say I'm sarcastic, and popmpous...to you maybe that's so. But what am I supposed to do when you ascribe sinister motives to my honest attmepts to pursuade you and you insult or ridicule me? I'm no shrinking violet, so I respond with as much ferocity as your vicious name calling and pejorative assumptions yet I try to maintain my own personal standards of decorum and civility.
I can be sharp tongued, but it's only in retaliation for the way I'm treated by you and other nasty posters on the Left. I don't have to call names and say disgusting things to retaliate to nastiness...I prefer to punish your vapid intellects leading you to such outbursts.
Our interactions on this forum are strictly up to you boom. Want civil, respectful, thought provoking exchange of ideas? I'm down with that. Want to crawl into the gutter to get my respect (which you posted you'd actually prefer) you can go there too, but don't expect me to follow you.
Last edited:
Well said boom. My kids don't always agree with me, but they do respect me as I do them and we always hear each other out then agree to respectfully disagree. I'd like to have that same relationship with you. Sometimes I change their minds, and sometimes they change mine but we always respect each other's positions.
I'll treat you exactly as you treat me, no different.
Last edited:
You 'da man 007![thumb2]
Another thread where countryroads89 embarrassed herself. Rifle will be disappointed.
Two thundering turds with the stench of Hillary.
BoomFizzle loves to paint others with his BoomPoom broom ! monkey see in mirror, monkey paint....BoommmmmmmmmmmmmmFizzzzzzzzzzle.
