I get what you're saying. I'm not naive to the world and its violence. It's sad that now its being inflicted on and by our youth in record numbers. I think we agree there is nothing that is likely to stop it nor prevent it from getting worse.Sounds great. But if you continue to ignore what I'm telling you then you will learn the hard way. The world has always been extremely violent and the 1950's and even the 1980's was a long time ago. I suggest we secure and harden the schools first. Then we Deal with all the mental illness and evil simultaneously. Clean that up then we can discuss lowering the threat level.
What does this have to do with the topic? And I'm delusional?
What does this have to do with the topic? And I'm delusional?
I would say most of what you mentioned has worked. The problem is that the "most violent schools" aren't the problem. It's the schools that have to choose new textbook/resources or metal detectors and SRO's. If this kid was able to have a rifle inside the school, I'd be willing to bet that there were not any detectors at the school.I get what you're saying. I'm not naive to the world and its violence. It's sad that now its being inflicted on and by our youth in record numbers. I think we agree there is nothing that is likely to stop it nor prevent it from getting worse.
I'm sure this area isn't really your forte, but I would encourage you to look at all the ways schools have been "hardened" since Columbine in 98. To add, "hardened" even more with each progressive act of violence.
Just a small list of what is in most schools in the US:
ID badges
Shooter lockdown drills
Resource officers
Safe school entrances
Door buzzers
Door alarms
Warning codes
Quick or self locking doors
Detectors in the most violent schools
Millions of dollars thrown at the above with more every year
The thing is - none of this works. Throwing more money at the problem to "harden" hasn't solve it and won't fix it.
Here's the reality - schools are safe. Things like this are extremely rare and stats show that school is the safest place a kid can be. The media portrays it as more common than it really is - like they do with white cop killing a black man. The emotion of an event causes people to act irrationally. That's been going on forever and will continue forever...
I get what you're saying. I'm not naive to the world and its violence. It's sad that now its being inflicted on and by our youth in record numbers. I think we agree there is nothing that is likely to stop it nor prevent it from getting worse.
I'm sure this area isn't really your forte, but I would encourage you to look at all the ways schools have been "hardened" since Columbine in 98. To add, "hardened" even more with each progressive act of violence.
Just a small list of what is in most schools in the US:
ID badges
Shooter lockdown drills
Resource officers
Safe school entrances
Door buzzers
Door alarms
Warning codes
Quick or self locking doors
Detectors in the most violent schools
Millions of dollars thrown at the above with more every year
The thing is - none of this works. Throwing more money at the problem to "harden" hasn't solve it and won't fix it.
Here's the reality - schools are safe. Things like this are extremely rare and stats show that school is the safest place a kid can be. The media portrays it as more common than it really is - like they do with white cop killing a black man. The emotion of an event causes people to act irrationally. That's been going on forever and will continue forever...
That's right. The world as is should be.Shewwwww. Again that's a pipe dream that's going to get more kids killed. There's the world you want to live in and the reality of the one you actually do. They are children. Our most valuable resource. Better wake up and start protecting them.
I would say most of what you mentioned has worked. The problem is that the "most violent schools" aren't the problem. It's the schools that have to choose new textbook/resources or metal detectors and SRO's. If this kid was able to have a rifle inside the school, I'd be willing to bet that there were not any detectors at the school.
That's right. The world as is should be.
But, as I stated above, these events are extremely rare. More common, yes, but still extremely rare. And school is the safest place a kid can be.
But, when one spends his days online, searching and finding the bad, believing that a Commie, Muslim, or illegal immigrant is hiding behind the tree just waiting to take us out, then one sees evil everywhere and lives a life constantly in paranoia and fear.
That's not the world. That's not the US. It's a delusion. There is plenty of good out there, one just has to go offline and out to see it.
Good point. But, let's look at the situation in reality.I would say most of what you mentioned has worked. The problem is that the "most violent schools" aren't the problem. It's the schools that have to choose new textbook/resources or metal detectors and SRO's. If this kid was able to have a rifle inside the school, I'd be willing to bet that there were not any detectors at the school.
Good point. But, let's look at the situation in reality.
People complain about the TSA and the process to board a plane. How today we have to get to the airport at least 2 hours early just to go through the process.
And this is for the what, maybe 100 people on a plane?
Think about how this would work for a school of 1K? Or 2K?
Of course, the detectors would only be located at one entrance so that everyone has to go through that entrance for safety reasons. Kid gets buzzed, the whole line has to stop so he can get more thoroughly scanned. Then the process repeats itself. Kids have to arrive hours early - to get to their seats when school starts.
Have to add this: the public school must bid this out. The winner is the company who comes in with the lowest. Which means inferior products and service. Teh cheapest product out there. Operators who are undertrained and underpaid. Like most things in the school system, it works a while then breaks, works a while then breaks, on and on, until someone figures out how to get around it - which isn't difficult - or just gives up on it.
So, in summary, in an attempt to prevent an extremely rare event from occurring, we are going to spend thousands of dollars at something that is going to cause a whole bunch of other problems, that isn't going to work like it was thought, easily defeated, all under the guise of safety.
The weapons are already in the school and if the shooter is motivated all that can be controlled is the damage.
So, you are saying since there would be some "inconvenience" for schools, that it's just not worth the safety measures?Good point. But, let's look at the situation in reality.
People complain about the TSA and the process to board a plane. How today we have to get to the airport at least 2 hours early just to go through the process.
And this is for the what, maybe 100 people on a plane?
Think about how this would work for a school of 1K? Or 2K?
Of course, the detectors would only be located at one entrance so that everyone has to go through that entrance for safety reasons. Kid gets buzzed, the whole line has to stop so he can get more thoroughly scanned. Then the process repeats itself. Kids have to arrive hours early - to get to their seats when school starts.
Have to add this: the public school must bid this out. The winner is the company who comes in with the lowest. Which means inferior products and service. Teh cheapest product out there. Operators who are undertrained and underpaid. Like most things in the school system, it works a while then breaks, works a while then breaks, on and on, until someone figures out how to get around it - which isn't difficult - or just gives up on it.
So, in summary, in an attempt to prevent an extremely rare event from occurring, we are going to spend thousands of dollars at something that is going to cause a whole bunch of other problems, that isn't going to work like it was thought, easily defeated, all under the guise of safety.
The weapons are already in the school and if the shooter is motivated all that can be controlled is the damage.
I'm guessing he's never been to a modern sporting event or amusement park where there are THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of people that must go through detector and bag checks, and it gets done in a very swift matter of time.Where and when did you attend a Physical Security School?
Maybe. Maybe not. Won't know until it is tried.Not my forte? You're definitely trolling. Secure and Harden the Schools. After you save the world with your wishful thinking then we can make adjustments to the threat level. You're nonsense is going to continue to get children slaughtered.
1988. You?Where and when did you attend a Physical Security School?
I'm guessing he's never been to a modern sporting event or amusement park where there are THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of people that must go through detector and bag checks, and it gets done in a very swift matter of time.
No its not worth it. Not in inconvenience nor in safety because it won't work. Gives the illusion of safety is all it does.So, you are saying since there would be some "inconvenience" for schools, that it's just not worth the safety measures?
They aren't coming in to shoot or blow the place up.I'm guessing he's never been to a modern sporting event or amusement park where there are THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of people that must go through detector and bag checks, and it gets done in a very swift matter of time.
1988. You?
I got paid to do it. Well, did until I retired. Saw the futility of it. Can't afford what it would take to work, and would, in the end, make problems worse as you would have to rob Peter to pay Paul to make it work - exasperating the problems that already exists in underfunded schools.Nothing is perfect nor will it stop every threat everytime. But like I said before. I use to volunteer for free to teach this stuff to School Leaders and Local Police Departments. Society has only gotten more dangerous since then. Spend the money to secure and harden the schools. We should have done it a long time ago instead of spending 20+ years trying to Nation Build in the Middle East. The Dopamine Feedback Loop is frying people's brain. So it's not going to get better anytime soon.
No its not worth it. Not in inconvenience nor in safety because it won't work. Gives the illusion of safety is all it does.
They aren't coming in to shoot or blow the place up.
Except when they do - like in London a few years ago or the Taylor Swift a few week ago.
Only thing that can prevent it is prior intelligence - like Vienna. A motivated person, especially a loner who can get lost in a crowd of one, you aren't stopping.
Ok. Believe what you want. There's a reason you only made G-7. If that.You have no Physical Security Training. You are basically repeating Kamala Harris and DNC Policies
You do remember this isn't the only thread on here right? Just checking on how high you are right now.
I got paid to do it. Well, did until I retired. Saw the futility of it. Can't afford what it would take to work, and would, in the end, make problems worse as you would have to rob Peter to pay Paul to make it work - exasperating the problems that already exists in underfunded schools.
Proud member.You understand the nonsense you are spouting is why we don't let our Libertarian Friends be in charge of Security.
Ok. Believe what you want. There's a reason you only made G-7. If that.
Sure you did.No you didn't. You understand anyone who has really done this stuff for a living knows your full shit? Right?
Proud member.
Because of the nonsense you spout and believe, that's the reason we need it
Sure you did.
If you did, you would understand why people who did don't brag about it.
What problem? A random school shooting once a year? It’s not a statistical problem requiring the kind of money you’re talking about. So, no, I don’t think Congress needs to appropriate funds to out in metal detectors. But, I’m also in favor of shutting down Govt funded drug treatment facilities and pulling Narcan off the streets. And, I’m in favor of letting big businesses that are going to fail, actually fail.So there was fraud, waste, and abuse from 2017-2021 too that prevented funding to go to the schools for this purpose? Stop trying to make this a "Democrat rule" problem when we both know the POTUS (either party) and Congress don't give a sh!t about fixing these situations.
What problem? A random school shooting once a year? It’s not a statistical problem requiring the kind of money you’re talking about. So, no, I don’t think Congress needs to appropriate funds to out in metal detectors. But, I’m also in favor of shutting down Govt funded drug treatment facilities and pulling Narcan off the streets. And, I’m in favor of letting big businesses that are going to fail, actually fail.
Look, it’s emotionally tragic, but I’m not prone to act on emotion against the freedoms of 300 million other people. It’s just a reality of our lives and it will continue. No measures that could be taken short of full firearm confiscation will solve school shootings. No reason to waste money on a problem that can’t be solved.