I admit I still strongly question Matt Murray's current ability to match Holtby save for save in consecutive games......then again, I think most will agree the pressure on Holtby (once he won Game 5) doesn't truly ramp up until Game 7. Speaking of Holtby, has he given up a single bad goal the entire series ?? Maybe so, but my feeble mind doesn't immediately recall one.
Meanwhile, the Pens have scored 13 goals in the 5 games whereas the Craps have scored 17 (though 3 were ENG). That means goals are 14-13 with goals tended, which means.....even with Murray's comparatively substandard play.....the Craps are hardly dominating on the scoreboard (and the Guins have actually outshot the Craps marginally, 142-138).
Don't recall if Guentzel's 2nd goal in the last minute of Game 4 might have been into the empty net (it was a PPG, though).
After an 82 game schedule and now 11 playoff games, I am not confident Murray can win a game for his team like I thought Holtby did in game 5. He has been perfectly average to below average all season if only based on save %. His failure to make a relatively easy save to preserve the lead in game 4 coupled with the two that went through his 5 hole Saturday all point to the fact that the Pens have to win with an average Murray. All that aside, other than the 2 minute blunder at the end of the first and the mindless Letang play to open the 3rd, the Pens controlled play. In many ways, it was the best game of the playoffs for the Pens all around considering the opponent. I can still see them taking the series. A game 7 puts the pressure squarely on the Caps and we all know how they react to that.