Justin Amash situation and townhall is interesting
- Thread starter WVUBRU
- Start date
Ummm, yeah, he did. You obviously didn’t read the report and fell for Barr’s false narrative.
But none would've beaten Hillbag. They couldn't play her game and win. Trump changed the game.
That's exactly the way I saw it when I predicted Trump would beat The Bitch. As usual I was spot on.
I will never read the report, its a political hit job, but he never made a determination on obstruction, and he was supposed to do just that! The fact that one of his instances of obstruction was Trump tweeting to the Russians to release Clinton's emails is all I need to know about it.
If Trump obstructed justice, then Biden and Bernie need a special council starting last year as there is far more proof of illegal activity than anything Trump has done in relation to using politics to gain an advantage.
Most wouldn't. But Kasich I think could have won PA and Michigan. The problem is turnout with him. Would he have drawn the turnout that Trump did. He has the personality to beat her, but there's no doubt that Trump's personality played well with the Blue Dogs in those states, as he actually spoke to them about their concerns.
Hillary was just a shit shit shit candidate against a strong personality.
I think Hillary being a historically bad candidate and so unlikable is really underrated reason for 2016
Mueller provided evidence of obstruction for Congress to evaluate. Of course you're aware that Mueller could not charge Trump with obstruction of justice.
You don't read very well but you're a Trump bootlicker so of course you're going to defend him no matter what he's done or what anyone says.
but you sure like talking about something you know nothing of. Trump hasn't read it either so you're in good company.
He was to write an opinion on obstruction, that was his job, he did not. Same with collusion, if he found collusion, he could not charge him with a crime but he was to write an opinion that if the campaign broke the law, it would allow the legal remedy to begin (whatever that would be).
If he could state that there was not collusion, could the same be true with objection? How are they any different?
Why do you keep talking about this "political hit job"? You've got it all figured out.
So you are going with the argument, if you did not read it, you can't have an opinion? How could you read it and come to a different conclusion of so many attorneys that disagree with you? Do you really believe that Trump obstructed justice and Congress is sitting on this? For what reason?
I do agree that Congress should have read the ACA, and the Muller report. On both instances, less then two members of congress read the unreacted Muller report and ZERO read the ACA prior to voting on it!
What attorneys?
Trump would have been charged with obstruction were he not president, hundreds of former federal prosecutors assert
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...946a1a-7006-11e9-9f06-5fc2ee80027a_story.html
You are better than this! If Trump were not President he could not have committed those crimes...agree? (joking)
It's stuff like this I try to get away from. Just another opinion piece, I will go back to if there was OOJ, Congress would already be in impeachment mode...it really is that simple.
Wrong.
Despite Evidence, Robert Mueller Would Not Say Whether Trump Obstructed Justice. Here's Why
http://time.com/5573289/robert-mueller-trump-obstruction-charges/
Yeah right. Forgive me if I take the opinion of hundreds of federal prosecutors over a Trump loyalist on a message board.
Mueller just disagreed with you. The special council charging the prez with a crime "was not an option we could consider".
Mueller just said he could not charge POTUS for this very reason.
Latest posts
-
-
WVSPORTS.COM Frazier drafted by the Pittsburgh Steelers in second round- Latest: Mountaineer Gooch
-
-
-
