Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think the father in law part was quoting anyone.Quoting another person is obstruction? Got it.
Quoting another person is obstruction? Got it.
I don't think the father in law part was quoting anyone.
I have to wonder if KKK is real or a troll app.Quoting another person is obstruction? Got it.
Eh. I don't know if it is or not. You and I tweeting it? Def not. POTUS? Maybe.Ok. So telling everyone to watch someone is obstruction then. Got it.
I'm not watching you, promise.
Obstruction can be defined pretty loosely. I mean anything you do to hinder an investigatiin can be defined as obstruction if someone really wanted to play the card. Not answering questions could be obstruction.Eh. I don't know if it is or not. You and I tweeting it? Def not. POTUS? Maybe.
I was just pointing out that the "obstruction" part of the tweet was the portion that was not in quotations.
Also, ie threatening Cohen's family, isn't Cohen finished cooperating? The horse is out of the barn, no? Not sure what he could be obstructing.Obstruction can be defined pretty loosely. I mean anything you do to hinder an investigatiin can be defined as obstruction if someone really wanted to play the card. Not answering questions could be obstruction.
Also, ie threatening Cohen's family, isn't Cohen finished cooperating? The horse is out of the barn, no? Not sure what he could be obstructing.
It's still incredibly sad/hilarious to see a President act like a child. over and over and over and over and over.
Cohen will testify to Congress on Feb 7...hence donnie’s Twitter meltdown and threatening a witness, which is obstruction of justice.
LOL wut? What threat?
I’ve done all I can do. I can’t actually think for you.
Hahahaha!
Talk about snowflakes.Cohen will testify to Congress on Feb 7...hence donnie’s Twitter meltdown and threatening a witness, which is obstruction of justice.
Cohen all of his testifying is done.
Cant wait for the guy who admits he lied to Congress to speak to Congress.Feb 7, you know, the one you aren’t going to watch and will be a big “nothingberder.”
Cant wait for the guy who admits he lied to Congress to speak to Congress.
Cant wait for the guy who admits he lied to Congress to speak to Congress.
I think his credibility is shot no matter what he does. Add to that what he stands to gain.So, you think the guy who admitted to lying to Congress will now lie about lying to Congress?
LMAO!
The MSM will act if Cohen is telling the God's honest truth. Most of us know how this will be portrayed. What is interesting is why Mueller has not brought charges against Trump IF he had this info.I think his credibility is shot no matter what he does. Add to that what he stands to gain.
I don't think he has anything to gain. That is a bunch of hooey that Trump is putting forth with absolutely nothing behind it as being factual. And Trumpers eat it up. Nothing new.I think his credibility is shot no matter what he does. Add to that what he stands to gain.
Agree.......I will add....the anti-anything Trumpers will eat it up.Cohen's testimony to Congress is going to be another clown show just like the Kavenaugh hearings. The two parties are too partisan and the opposition to Cohen will only focus on discrediting him and everything he says. There will be a ton of grandstanding and childish behavior from many members on both sides. It is a damn shame our elected officials act in the manner they do.
Will still be interesting TV.
Trump lies just like all of them do. If Trump lies under oath......he is toast.......that why he won't agree to any sit downs. I also believe that Trump is toast in the court of public opinion and will not be in office in Jan 2021.Speaking only for myself, without substantial proof of some type on whatever Cohen says that is negative on Trump when he testifies, I will not believe a known liar on the surface. I don't believe anything Trump says and I won't believe what any of these people that worked for Trump say. Stuff may end up being true but when you lose credibility, I for one will not be one that take liar's good intentions to be truthful without validated proof.
But with that being said, Cohen would have to be the dumbest person ever to lie again to Congress.
KKtard should type that story and send it to BUZZFEED, Sure to be in print tomorrow...The "watch father-in-law" bit is supposed to be a threat? Is that what you're trying to connect the dots to now? LOL
Cohen is sentenced, and all of his testifying is done. Why would he be threatening? I'm guessing here, quite a limb I'm going out on, but I'd bet Trump is referring to watching his father-in-law's loan of $20 mil.
Talk about conspiracy theories.
Tell us what bad journalism looks like sugatits.
fifyI’ve done all I can do. I can’t actually think for myself.
Hahahaha!
Wanna know what isnt amazing?you guys are amazing
You do realize that traitor44 can still be impeached and indicted for his involvement in spying and wiretapping Trumps campaign, not to mention, while DOJ IG is looking at Hillary email case, traitor44 being investigated for using gmail alias to her private server...
You do know who sat on the CFIUS under traitor44, right? Let’s start digging into their money transactions that they received from the Foundation. traitor44 using gmail alias to email classified ts documents to her unsecure server. Real Crime.
alias gmail accts from traitor44 admin.
AG Eric Holder: “Lew Alcindor.”
IRS Lois Lerner: “Toby Miles."
EPA Lisa Jackson: “Richard Windsor.”
Loretta Lynch used the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle,”
Comey's private gmail acct etc & emails from Obama using a alias show they were running a shadow gov't. below the radar of congress & gov't oversight. To implement Obama socialist transformation, they all need impeached and prosecuted.
Feb 7, you know, the one you aren’t going to watch and will be a big “nothingberder.”
I dont get it. How many people have issued public statements asking for investigations into other families? Were those considered threats?
I dont get it. How many people have issued public statements asking for investigations into other families? Were those considered threats?
Uhhhhhh....POTUS carries a smidge more weight. As would a police chief, mayor, etc. Is it a threat, is it not a threat....I don't know (don't care either), but let's not hold our President to the same standard as CatturdI dont get it. How many people have issued public statements asking for investigations into other families? Were those considered threats?