You liked using that word earlier in the thread but apparently, let's use a synonym to satisfy your delusion..
The 1200 that was killed was a combination of civilian and IDF. In either case, it was 100% wrong and should be held accountable. What you struggle with is the current genocide...............I mean, let's call it boo boo attack.
Unprovoked yet living in concentration camp... Got it.
When you write "held accountable" I have to ask..
WHO should be held accountable?
HOW should they be held into account?
WHEN should they be held accountable?
WHY should they be held accountable?
WHAT if they don't want to be held accountable?
Now, to answer your question from before if it IS a genocide? The answer is no.
A genocide occurs when a group or nation attempts to
completely destroy another group or nation without provocation, cause, or some reason that cannot be changed such as race, creed, ethnicity, etc. To kill 1.5% of the population who wants you driven into the sea, who doesn't want nor acknowledge your sovereignty,
with cause, is not genocide - that's war and survival.
They are living in this "concentration camp" because they refuse the two-state solution you think they want. They are a conquered people who fought for control and lost. They could leave this "concentration camp" anytime they want - except no other nation, Arab, Jew, nor Gentile - wants them in their country. Wonder why?
Research those answers and let us know. Try it logically without the futile emotional semantics. May make your answers seem less preposterous.