ADVERTISEMENT

RECRUITING UPDATE Spoke with new 2025 OL offer

Login to view embedded media
Parma (Oh.) Padua Franciscan 2025 offensive lineman Brandon Homady told me that he hadn't heard much from West Virginia prior to recently after the coaching staff was able to get a look at his senior highlights. He made the trip to Morgantown for the Kansas State game and found out about the offer. He told me that he really liked what he saw on campus and understands the winning culture and the way that the Mountaineers develop their players. He is being targeted as an interior lineman at guard or center and he told me that he is looking into an official visit. Homady is currently committed to Ohio.

Login to view embedded media

WVSPORTS.COM A look at Neal Brown's contract

Assuming WVU decides to move on, the key points will be the ability to negotiate the buyout, the amount of time given to pay the buyout and what other employment for Neal means to the bottom line. For WVU it will come down to if they can gamble on the belief that hiring a new coach will raise enough money to justify the move. I think they can but I'm not the one putting my career on the line...although it feels like it anymore.

2021 Extension

Login to view embedded media
The 2024 amendment.

Login to view embedded media

How Curt Cignetti turned around IU

Sorry no link for this but was in the Indy Star

After spending the Sunday he fired Tom Allen informing players, sitting with team leaders and fielding phone calls, Indiana's athletic director sat for a Zoom the next morning with the head coach at James Madison. Curt Cignetti had been running his own programs for 13 years — his process so refined he could more or less write it up as a manual — and for 13 years, all he’d done was win.
Dolson was trying to turn around a frustrated loser, a program that had fought for relevance over the latter half of the 2010s only to watch it dry up in an NIL-driven, post-COVID world. The heady days of Michael Penix’s stretch for the pylon against Penn State seemed like a time long past when Dolson sat down in front of his computer and started talking to Cignetti.
As soon as the call ended, Dolson, reenergized, hopped out of his chair and down the hall to Deputy AD Mattie White’s office.
“This guy’s different,” Dolson told White. “I think he can win here.”
So far, Cignetti has done nothing else.

On Saturday, for the first time since 1993, (Indiana’s) Memorial Stadium will host a ranked matchup of Big Ten teams in front of fans, when No. 18 IU faces No. 25 Nebraska. Discounting the closed-door COVID season, the last time the Hoosierstook the field at home in conference play in such a game, Bill Mallory was coaching against George Perles.



Fox’s Big Noon Kickoff will be live from outside the South End Zone on Saturday morning. A national audience will be treated to what might turn out to be among the more important games in the Big Ten this season. And between now and then, everyone not living on the inside of Cignetti’s remarkable turnaround thus far will seek an answer to some version of the root question:
How has this all happened?


Veteran savvy​

Cignetti generally starts his own answers to variations on that question with his players. But the roster itself reflects decisions he made early in his tenure — ones based on years of head-coaching experience — now integral to Indiana’s success.
Chiefly among them, Cignetti leaned hard into veterans.

He faced massive roster churn in his first days on the job (he’s fond of citing 10 offensive starters and half a defense in the portal as his starting point), and instead of loading up on malleable youth, he and his staff targeted old hands.
“I’m into production over potential,” Cignetti told reporters in December, just before he set about cashing that particular check with a slew of Group-of-Five transfers meant to rebuild key position groups, particularly on offense.
That meant sacrificing long-term stability for short-term steadiness. IU took transfers with just one year of eligibility remaining (potential medical exceptions aside) at positions including quarterback, wide receiver, running back, offensive line, defensive line and elsewhere. There will be plenty of work for Cignetti and his staff to do again in the transfer portal this winter as a result.
But the turnabout has been on display for all to see — Indiana is a veteran team that plays like it in key moments, be they third downs, red zone situations or tight games. The poise and composure serving IU so well in the season’s most important moments might have been gained elsewhere, but they were hard won nonetheless.

Secret to IU's 6-0 start?The best red zone offense in the country.
“It just brings a confidence to the team,” Wake Forest transfer wide receiver Ke’Shawn Williams, Indiana’s leader with four receiving touchdowns, said after the win at Northwestern earlier this month. “We have a lot of guys who came in who are older, who came from winning cultures, and understand what it takes to be a good team. And it’s clearly translating.”
Since preseason, Cignetti has grounded a lot of his publicly held belief in his team in these traits.
It wasn’t by accident when he rebuilt his roster, he rebuilt it this way. Maybe, then, it shouldn’t have been surprising to see him so confident in the group he and his staff used significantly bolstered NIL resources to pull together last winter.
Statistically speaking, IU’s leading passer, its four leading rushers, five of its six leading receivers, its top four tacklers and all four players with at least 1.5 sacks so far this season are transfers. Kurtis Rourke (Ohio), Elijah Sarratt (James Madison), Mikail Kamara (James Madison) and Aiden Fisher (James Madison) all currently rank top-five or better in the Big Ten in, respectively, passing yards and touchdowns, receiving yards, sacks and tackles for loss, and total tackles.

Even before a ball was snapped, thrown or kicked this season, Cignetti anchored his confidence in his team in the qualities on display now — and the Hoosiers have made him look prescient.
“We have a lot of veteran players. We have a veteran quarterback. And I think we have a chance to be a good offense and defense and special teams,” Cignetti said in a news conference building up to the Week 1 opener against Florida International. “I feel good about the pieces we have in place.”

The JMU pipeline​

It’s difficult not to notice how many of those players added last winter — players now crucial to Indiana’s success — enjoyed the same experience under Cignetti at his last stop.
Fully 13 players followed Cignetti and the six assistants he brought with him from James Madison to Bloomington. That includes starters at seven positions, eight if you count Solomon Vanhorse’s role as kickoff return specialist. And that’s not accounting for the likelihood Nick Kidwell would have started at one of Indiana’s two offensive guard spots if not for a season-ending injury suffered in fall camp.
Those players have talked since the beginning of the offseason about the responsibility they feel for leading, even as new faces. On both sides of the ball, JMU transfers have prioritized reinforcing their coaches’ messages and methods, and vouched for the results, then turned plenty in themselves.
And when Indiana has needed to set a tone — when the program has needed confidence, or cool heads, or anything else — former Dukes haven’t been shy of those moments either.
“This is not the goal,” Kamara said after the Northwestern win clinched bowl eligibility two weeks ago. “This is fantastic, but this is not the end.”
When, at Big Ten media days in July, Cignetti referenced “a lot of guys that have played winning football, that have good career production numbers,” he might have been thinking foremost about the talent he brought with him from Harrisonburg.
“They believe that they’re going to win,” Cignetti said, referencing the several JMU transfers Indiana announced during the December signing window. “They think like champions. They believe in the coaches. They believe in the program. They believe they’re going to step foot on (campus) and make a difference.
“Guess what? I believe that too.”
The biggest key, according to virtually everyone involved, has been Cignetti himself.
Beginning on that November Zoom call with Dolson, momentum has built steadily behind the man who’s never really known losing as a head coach.
For a long time — until the games started — Cignetti presented a great academic exercise for the Big Ten. Here was a coach of unflappable confidence, a man who boiled his recruiting pitch down to “I win. Google me,” who had success everywhere he went, pushing up against the myriad challenges presented by trying to turn around the losingest program in the conference’s long history.
The unstoppable force has, so far, moved the unmovable object. The coach who estimates the average day starts before sun up and ends after sun down, who has a projector aimed at an empty white wall in his office he uses to watch film in virtually all his spare time, has been the impetus behind building one of the most competent, efficient and ruthless teams anyone around IU football can remember in years.
Whenever they’re asked to explain how, virtually everyone involved starts with Cignetti himself.
“It starts with his confidence,” Fisher said. “He instills that into his players, just the way he holds himself, the way he prepares, and you really see it trickle down into his players going into each game. We know we’re more prepared than the other team is, and we just kind of ride that into the game.”
For so much of the past 10 months, Curt Cignetti has been explaining himself.
How he recruits. How he plays offense and defense. How he attacks the portal. How he builds a winner. How he plans to turn around the once-moribund IU football program he suddenly has flying high.
In any number of ways, Cignetti has been asked to detail in detail the process he’s used to take Indiana — a winner just nine times in the past three years — to 6-0 in his first season in Bloomington. Which made a question Cignetti got in his weekly Monday news conference all the more fascinating:
Over these past several months, what have you learned?
“What I've learned up to this point,” Cignetti said, after a brief pause for reflection, “is that we have unlimited potential as an institution and football program. That if you commit daily and do the things you need to do to be successful, there's no imposed limitations on what you can achieve.”
Since his first day on the job, Cignetti has given his fans permission to dream. Thus far, those dreams have turned steadily into reality, and IU’s coach shows no intention of capping his ambitions now.

The Goal and Bar for this program should be to annually compete for the B12 Championship

Nobody is demanding or asking to compete for the NC. I don’t think it unreasonable to expect WVU to compete for the B12 championship. Iowa State, Kansas State, Oklahoma State routinely do it. BYU is doing it in year 2. We’ve never done it in over a decade plus since we entered the league. It’s ok to have down years, but not consistently be down. That should be the expectation for the next HC coming in for the interview.

Trump was Correct ABC Was Wrong

A fact-check in the ABC News presidential debate has aged poorly after the FBI quietly made a stunning correction about violent crime rates in the U.S.

In last month's political showdown between former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump cited the rise of violent crime to hammer the Biden-Harris administration's record.

"Crime here is up and through the roof despite their fraudulent statements that they made," Trump said. "Crime in this country is through the roof."

ABC debate moderator David Muir attempted to fact-check the Republican nominee.
"President Trump, as you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is actually coming down in this country," Muir responded.

Trump immediately pushed back.

"Excuse me," Trump told Muir. "They were defrauding statements. They didn't include the worst cities. They didn't include the cities with the worst crime. It was a fraud. Just like their number of 818,000 jobs that they said they created turned out to be a fraud."

The latest FBI revision now backs Trump.
After reporting there was a 2.1% drop in violent crimes in 2022, the FBI now admits there was actually a 4.5% increase.

WVSPORTS.COM Observations: West Virginia football vs. Kansas State

–Well, It’s Groundhog Day again. West Virginia again had a ranked opponent at home with No. 17 Kansas State and again couldn’t get it done. In fact, this one probably was the least competitive of the three home losses to ranked teams this season as the Mountaineers really weren’t even competitive in the second half. Yes, this is a beat up football team dealing with a lot of injuries including some to their best offensive players in this game but this is just another notch on the belt of disappointment for this team in a season that opened with so much promise. The Mountaineers are now 3-4 on the season and their best win is to a 3-4 Oklahoma State team and now at 2-2 in the Big 12 you can essentially kiss any possible hope that you were holding out for a potential run to the Big 12 Championship game. Yeah, I know stop snickering but it was at least a possibility had they won this football game. This was the largest home loss under Brown if that says all you need to know.

–This just hasn’t been a good week for the program any way you slice it and the grumbles are only going to get louder after this performance at home. But as I mentioned early this week, results matter and this just hasn’t been good enough with many of the same issues cropping up game after game and year after year. We’re now 67 games into this tenure and Brown is 34-33. All of the good will that was built from the 9-4 campaign is basically gone at this point and it’s going in the other direction. I looked around the stadium with 11 minutes left in this one and it was basically empty. That’s not what this program wants to be about and the lack of success is reaching a boiling point with the fan base.

–Again, mistakes with two turnovers in the first half including one being directly cashed in for a touchdown, untimely penalties and really questionable decisions loomed large over this one. Two plays really sum up this game to me, the fourth down at the end of the first half which was a disaster and then to start the second half on fourth down, the defense can’t bring Avery Johnson down on a sack and that drive ended with a touchdown that almost felt like it put the game away. Statistically it would have seemed that West Virginia was in control in the first half, but turnovers and mistakes again were the problem as the Mountaineers are now -7 in turnover margin this year.

–West Virginia has certainly lost to some good football teams this year but again, the angst comes from the fact that you’ve had back-to-back prime time games at home against ranked teams that were only slight favorites and you weren’t competitive. There’s no excuse for that and it continues to happen. You can point to bad calls, mishaps, execution or whatever else you want but it’s the same story. It isn’t unreasonable to expect to win one of these football games at home and it continues to be disappointing. It’s been almost three calendar years since West Virginia last beat a ranked team and for all the talk about being a contending team the Mountaineers are now 3-4 and are going to be scratching and clawing to try to get into a bowl game at this stage. That’s not what anybody wanted to see, especially when you consider that West Virginia is now 3-17 against ranked teams. That’s bad.

–Senior quarterback Garrett Greene didn’t play his best while he was in this game, including some really poor throws which directly led to a pair of interceptions. Greene settled down some after the pick six, but still was just 9-19 for 85 yards and a score. But Greene’s legs were by far the best option the offense had as he rushed for 88 yards on 10 carries and kept multiple drives alive with his ability to run. Those calling for Nicco Marchiol got their wish in this one due to injury, but it wasn’t pretty against a very good defense. That’s not all on him with some key pieces out, but Marchiol struggled to find his footing as Kansas State basically ran away with the game in the second half. The offense did look better late but by that point the game was well decided.

–West Virginia held Kansas State to 26 yards rushing on 16 carries through three quarters but found themselves down 31-10. This is against a team that has basically moved the football on the ground but the Mountaineers just allowed easy throws to Avery Johnson and he got into rhythm. If you would have told me Giddens would have 30 yards rushing, I’d have thought West Virginia would be in a good spot. Guess not?

–Kansas State kept West Virginia largely in check outside of those scrambles by Greene. That was basically the only positive on offense but on the flip side, the passing of Greene left a lot to be desired as he missed a number of opportunities that were there.

–It wouldn’t have mattered and it’s not an excuse, but again the officiating was miserable in this game. That sequence in the first half where they missed the late hit and the facemask until the crowd’s reaction was just two of multiple examples. This crew didn’t have a good night.

–The Mountaineers will next get ready for an Arizona that’s been pretty much following the same storyline as they were picked in the top 25 to start the year but now sit at 3-4 on the season. We’ll have to see what the health of this team looks like this week, but it’s become a critical game just to see if this team can build any semblance of success. This certainly isn’t fun.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT