Just cannot wrap my mind around the logic.
10 |
11 |
Illinois |
Big Ten |
9-3 |
0-1 |
2-1 |
7-1 |
2-3 |
1-0 |
0-0 |
6-0 |
23 |
23 |
Arizona |
Big 12 |
7-5 |
0-1 |
1-3 |
6-1 |
0-5 |
1-0 |
2-0 |
4-0 |
29 |
29 |
West Virginia |
Big 12 |
10-2 |
1-1 |
2-1 |
7-0 |
3-2 |
0-0 |
1-0 |
6-0 |
Yet the Mounties by all objective "NET" measures and the head to head, are many spots below.
Something seems amiss and the formula should be transparent.
Yes I get it, win and its all fine however, objectivity seems lacking here. Maybe someone has a better understanding of the NET formula than I.