How does WVU score enough points to beat Texas Tech?
- By OzzyBear
- The Blue Lot
- 26 Replies
I have no idea how good or bad Texas Tech is this season. All I know is they are averaging 35 points per game. Based on what I've seen from WVU this season how do the Mountaineers score enough points to beat TTU?
Does the secondary's performance against Pitt translate in any way shape or form similar results against the Raiders? TTU's defense has given up plenty of yards and points to Wyoming and Oregon but I'm concerned WVU's receivers are not on par and thus cannot keep up with TTU's production in the passing game.
I would feel better going into the game had WVU shown more aptitude passing against Pitt. I was hoping that Carter, Ray and Gallagher would have more opportunities to show their skillsets against Pitt.
I'm no football guru but I'm concerned Brown's conservative play calling only puts the Mountaineers behind the 8 ball in Big 12 play. I'm even more concerned Brown's conservative play calling is due to necessity rather than ideology.
How many points does WVU need to beat Texas Tech? 35? 40? Heck, how does WVU manage to score 1 more point that TTU if the secondary plays like it did against PSU and the Dukes?
My assumption is that Greene is out against Tech. Marchiol strikes me, and my opinion is based on nothing of substance, as west-coast offense type QB who takes what the defense gives him and rarely goes deep. if that's true then my concern shifts back to the receivers and the need for them to find a way to get open and then catch the ball.
Usually I'm optimistic, but in this case I think the secondary's performance against Pitt was partly due to playing against a terrible QB. Can the secondary cover Tech's receivers? Can they find a way to keep Tech's passing game contained? Or do we see a repeat of the performance against Penn State?
I figure WVU needs to average 8.75 to 10 points per quarter to beat Tech - that would put them at 35-40 points. is that enough? Is it doable based on what we've seen so far?
Does the secondary's performance against Pitt translate in any way shape or form similar results against the Raiders? TTU's defense has given up plenty of yards and points to Wyoming and Oregon but I'm concerned WVU's receivers are not on par and thus cannot keep up with TTU's production in the passing game.
I would feel better going into the game had WVU shown more aptitude passing against Pitt. I was hoping that Carter, Ray and Gallagher would have more opportunities to show their skillsets against Pitt.
I'm no football guru but I'm concerned Brown's conservative play calling only puts the Mountaineers behind the 8 ball in Big 12 play. I'm even more concerned Brown's conservative play calling is due to necessity rather than ideology.
How many points does WVU need to beat Texas Tech? 35? 40? Heck, how does WVU manage to score 1 more point that TTU if the secondary plays like it did against PSU and the Dukes?
My assumption is that Greene is out against Tech. Marchiol strikes me, and my opinion is based on nothing of substance, as west-coast offense type QB who takes what the defense gives him and rarely goes deep. if that's true then my concern shifts back to the receivers and the need for them to find a way to get open and then catch the ball.
Usually I'm optimistic, but in this case I think the secondary's performance against Pitt was partly due to playing against a terrible QB. Can the secondary cover Tech's receivers? Can they find a way to keep Tech's passing game contained? Or do we see a repeat of the performance against Penn State?
I figure WVU needs to average 8.75 to 10 points per quarter to beat Tech - that would put them at 35-40 points. is that enough? Is it doable based on what we've seen so far?