WVU's horrible PR plan: Keep the flames going
- The Blue Lot
- 46 Replies
Changes at WVU, including cuts to campus programs and administrative functions, are not over - WV MetroNews
University leaders have alluded to additional upcoming decisions about cuts.
wvmetronews.com
The cuts at West Virginia University aren’t over.
The Board of Governors gave final approval on Friday of cuts that will eliminate 28 majors, scale back others and result in cutting 143 faculty positions. WVU has said the steps to make those changes happen begin today, shaping plans to allow students in programs being discontinued to finish their degrees and starting notifications for reductions in force.
“Over the next month, we’ll be obviously following a process that we have outlined to the university community, and we hope to have this process completed by the 15th of October,” University President Gordon Gee said today on MetroNews’ “Talkline.”
University leaders have alluded to additional upcoming decisions about cuts. West Virginia Watch reported today that programs under review include the libraries, Honors College, Office of Global Affairs, LGBTQ+ Center and the Women’s Resource Center.
Gee, on “Talkline,” acknowledged additional belt tightening is still going on, although he did not elaborate on many specifics.
“Well, we are going through a whole process of looking very carefully into every one of our programs,” Gee said. “In fact, we have been directed that way by the Board of Governors, and we’re doing that as we speak. We’re taking a look at every office."
Gee answered similarly when asked about the possibility of additional cuts at a press conference that followed Friday’s Board of Governors meeting.
“We are reviewing everything,” Gee said at the Friday press conference. “So we don’t know what’s going to happen. We do know that we need to be effective and efficient in every aspect of the institution, including in the president’s office, including the vice president’s office.
“We believe that what is good for the goose is good for the gander, so we’re looking very carefully at every program at the institution, at every office, to make sure we’re getting the best results with the best people.”
WVU officials have said the university has to cut back because of the likelihood of being down $45 million this year — potentially growing to $75 million over the next five years if steps aren’t taken to control costs. Gee has also said the changes are part of a broader assessment of the institution and the mission it serves.
The changes that received final approval Friday by the Board of Governors were discussed for several months and were subject to appeals hearings and a public comment hearing that lasted for several hours.
Taunja Willis Miller, chairwoman of WVU’s Board of Governors, said on “Talkline” that board members had directed Gee and university leaders to work through the changes. She said board members have a fiduciary duty to ensure the university operates in a fiscally stable manner and to prepare the university for a bright future.
“We asked for the academic transformation,” she said. “But we did listen. We didn’t learn much of anything during the meeting on Friday or even during the hearings on Thursday. “We’ve been hearing from people for months. We’ve gotten hundreds of emails. And there were comments submitted in writing.
“So I think what we did see from a personal standpoint is the passion and commitment that the students who were present and the faculty who were present had. But the board did have a job to do.”
In recent weeks, as pressure mounted, more and more conflict surfaced. Faculty overwhelmingly voted no confidence in President Gordon Gee this month, while also pushing for a halt to the transformation process. Students gathered at Friday’s meeting with signs to protest the changes, sometimes causing the proceedings to halt.
“Well, let’s be clear that with respect to the students — the students who have participated actively are a small percentage of the student body at WVU,” Willis Miller said. “With respect to the faculty, well, the vote of no confidence was passed by a vast majority of those voting. There again, it was, I think, a third of the faculty as a whole.
“But we based our analysis on a careful analysis of student demand for the program and what students want in their education. There are some students who will be affected, and it’s heartbreaking that we can’t provide everything to everyone who wants it. But that’s just not the reality.”