Trump hasn't said that. I have. Trump has said he'll work with Democrats for a national law.Abortion is a State issue now. Trump isn't running for Governor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump hasn't said that. I have. Trump has said he'll work with Democrats for a national law.Abortion is a State issue now. Trump isn't running for Governor.
Trump hasn't said that. I have. Trump has said he'll work with Democrats for a national law.
I use my brain. You should try itThey hate Trump and us. That isn't for the same reasons. They hate Trump because he slowed their efforts down by being elected in 2016. They hate us because of our beliefs. Trump does not share those beliefs. Why not try to elect someone who will fight the swamp with our beliefs?
Your biggest issue-abortion. Trump doesn't align with you. How do you reconcile?
Which abortions are OK with you?
They have to cheat if they're going to win. They cannot offer Americans a better agenda or a better candidate than Trump and it drives them insane doing or saying insane things.
This is where the media and politicians really deserve a dose of their own medicine. They silence people because of "misinformation" but it is ok if they want to spread misinformation.Most Americans do not want to ban adoration in those rare cases of rape and incest. The Dems have won the narrative on this issue, and it's hurting the GOP in many states.
On your first response I agree, however most Americans also favor restrictions on abortion especially restrictions on late term tax payer funded abortions which ALL Democrats oppose. That will hurt them in just as many States as you point out only Republicans being hurt.Most Americans do not want to ban adoration in those rare cases of rape and incest. The Dems have won the narrative on this issue, and it's hurting the GOP in many states.
Then why make it easy for them to do so?!
I don't see where Trump disagrees with my abortion positions. Explain?They hate Trump and us. That isn't for the same reasons. They hate Trump because he slowed their efforts down by being elected in 2016. They hate us because of our beliefs. Trump does not share those beliefs. Why not try to elect someone who will fight the swamp with our beliefs?
Your biggest issue-abortion. Trump doesn't align with you. How do you reconcile?
All Dems are not in opposition of zero restrictions on late term abortions. You’re either lying to further your right wing or stupid…and probably both.On your first response I agree, however most Americans also favor restrictions on abortion especially restrictions on late term tax payer funded abortions which ALL Democrats oppose. That will hurt them in just as many States as you point out only Republicans being hurt.
On your second point virtually any and all efforts to make voting more secure and increase voter integrity through signature and I.D. verifications as well as updating/purging outdated voter registration rolls is opposed again only by Democrats. No one wants to make it easier to cheat, but Democrats and Leftists oppose all efforts to make it harder.
Oh look who's back accusing others of lying and being stupid? I asked you some time ago you may recall to name any prominent Democrats who favor restrictions on tax payer funded late term abortions of choice?All Dems are not in opposition of zero restrictions on late term abortions. You’re either lying to further your right wing or stupid…and probably both.
All of them do minus a loon on two. You don’t understand. So not much else to explain.Oh look who's back accusing others of lying and being stupid? I asked you some time ago you may recall to name any prominent Democrats who favor restrictions on tax payer funded late term abortions of choice?
You never answered. Is it because you're a liar trying to further your Left wing ideology or you're stupid?
Probably both.
I just asked for a few names. Shouldn't be that hard. You realize the Democrat party's official position is no restrictions on late term abortions for any reason? You knew that right?All of them do minus a loon on two. You don’t understand. So not much else to explain.
I’m not doing your research for you. You aren’t being honest about it any way. You’ll think whatever you want, which is wrong. Not unusual for you.I just asked for a few names. Shouldn't be that hard. You realize the Democrat party's official position is no restrictions on late term abortions for any reason? You knew that right?
Even if you didn't, you can at least drop one or two prominent Democrat names who've announced or spoken out in favor of restrictions on late term abortions of choice?
So who 'ya got?
You don't have to do any "research" my man. Just drop a couple of Democrat names on us who support restrictions on late term choice abortions? Taxpayer funded or not? I'm saying there are none. Am I wrong?I’m not doing your research for you. You aren’t being honest about it any way. You’ll think whatever you want, which is wrong. Not unusual for you.
I had a purpose asking you to back this up. I proved in asking you for a few prominent Democrat names opposed to restrictions on late term choice abortions that you once again never back up what you post on here. I also showed how being on the Left, you typically accuse others of what YOU do and who YOU are!All Dems are not in opposition of zero restrictions on late term abortions. You’re either lying to further your right wing or stupid…and probably both.
He won't have a answer . The dnc wants late term murder at will abortions. all democrats must fall in line or the money will stop . Same as open borders, boys can breastfeed, and many , many other socialists leftists agendas.I had a purpose asking you to back this up. I proved in asking you for a few prominent Democrat names opposed to restrictions on late term choice abortions that you once again never back up what you post on here. I also showed how being on the Left, you typically accuse others of what YOU do and who YOU are!
Not bad for one night's work 'ya think? Appreciate your gracious participation. 🫡
Why do you care what a person you have never met and likely never will meet does when the act doesn't harm you or even remotely affect you?What is "lame" about defending innocent babies from being slaughtered limb by limb before they're born?
I know you won't answer, but isn't it interesting how casually you dismiss what abortion in reality is yet you can't as casually defend it?
Now a fetus is a baby. Hmmm.... Strange you whine about men who call themselves women.I 100% agree with you...the baby's rights (particularly its right to Life) is never discussed in this debate. We have a poster in this thread who characterized the debate as "lame" but when he was asked what exactly is "lame" about defending an innocent baby's life from wanton slaughter he left the thread. What you say here @roadtrasheer is of course correct but as I mentioned, as a culture we have embraced "death" so the innocent Life of the baby you so eloquently pointed out in your post is not allowed to be discussed in this debate!
You and I being Pro Life know why the baby's life is never allowed to be part of this discussion. It's because the pro death crowd would lose the debate. 🤔
Just checking in late after being out this evening to see if @NYC_Eer ever offered any of his favorite Democrats standing up for restrictions on late term choice abortions?
I offered to help with a list of many who do not, but his claim "all of them do" isn't supported by his own list.
Wonder why not? 😏
That is a pretty bad argument. A fetus has always been a baby. Nothing wrong with protecting a babies rights if a states voters want that.Now a fetus is a baby. Hmmm.... Strange you whine about men who call themselves women.
So you're prepared now to tell us what else a "fetus" is if it isn't a Baby? 🤔 If it isn't "alive" while also being a baby then what is it, and why does it have to be killed in order to be aborted? Please answer this with some rationale, have a backbone for Christ's sake!Now a fetus is a baby. Hmmm.... Strange you whine about men who call themselves women.
I guess changing the definitions is perfectly acceptable depending on the issue.
Have a backbone for christ's sake.
Excellent point here Dave! Imagine an expectant mother who actually is thrilled over the prospect of she and her husband's first Blessed offspring? She excitedly tells her hubby when he comes home from a hard day's work of paying for creepy Joe Biden's inflationary spending: "Guess what honey? I got my tests back from the OB/GYN today...and we're pregnant with a FETUS!!!!! Isn't it wonderful?"That is a pretty bad argument. A fetus has always been a baby. Nothing wrong with protecting a babies rights if a states voters want that.
So you pull into your local convenience store and see a robber brutally assaulting an innocent Mother and her helpless infant. He's about to beat them to death before making off with his haul. You can stop it and save their lives. Does your rationale as you've described it here still apply in defending an innocent baby's life in this example?Why do you care what a person you have never met and likely never will meet does when the act doesn't harm you or even remotely affect you?
I notice you cannot defend killing the innocent baby, so you cleverly adjust the boundaries of the debate into how it's hurting the GOP? I asked you what's "lame" about defending an innocent baby's right to Life? Your argument is "lame". Who cares about saving the GOP if it means allowing the random slaughter of millions of innocent children who didn't ask to be born, but still have a right to live?This is a losing issue for Republicans and it is clear the election 4 weeks ago didn't wake any of you up.
Not until the nutjobs changed the definitions several years ago just like the ADL changed the definition of racism to suit their needs last year.That is a pretty bad argument. A fetus has always been a baby. Nothing wrong with protecting a babies rights if a states voters want that.
Well if I am witnessing an attack just feet away, it certainly would affect me. Robbery is a crime against living human beings. It can make us all feel less safe in our community and cause businesses to vacate areas where it occurs and potential customers to take their business elsewhere.So you pull into your local convenience store and see a robber brutally assaulting an innocent Mother and her helpless infant. He's about to beat them to death before making off with his haul. You can stop it and save their lives. Does your rationale as you've described it here still apply in defending an innocent baby's life in this example?
What's the difference...neither scenario is "none of your business", you've never met them before, they're perfect strangers to you, the man isn't robbing YOU and it's not even your money he's stealing! So you'd just walk on by while the baby and its mother are slaughtered to death?
You are one sick individual. Proud of yourself?
I didn't say anything about killing babies. And now you are calling embryos children. That's cute.I notice you cannot defend killing the innocent baby, so you cleverly adjust the boundaries of the debate into how it's hurting the GOP? I asked you what's "lame" about defending an innocent baby's right to Life? Your argument is "lame". Who cares about saving the GOP if it means allowing the random slaughter of millions of innocent children who didn't ask to be born, but still have a right to live?
Please top posting me about this. I'm Christian and I'm not sure I can withhold what I might suggest of condemning your rotten Soul to Hell for such Evil. I'll Pray for you, but please don't post me anymore because I'm so upset with you right now I might curse you out.
Guess what you arrogant, self absorbed, myopic, miscreant? YOU are also nothing but an "embryo" who's been granted Grace by your Creator... Almighty God to live! I Pray for his Mercy and Justice for the day to come when YOU will become ashes to ashes as we all were once dust-to-dust!I didn't say anything about killing babies. And now you are calling embryos children. That's cute.
I guess we do live in times where we just change the definitions to suit our needs so Caitlyn Jenner is a woman. Good lord.
If I'm not wrong but a zygote is still considered life . When did it become acceptable to take life to make up for our mistakes? When did it become acceptable to take a innocent life to make our life's better?Why do you care what a person you have never met and likely never will meet does when the act doesn't harm you or even remotely affect you?
Mind your own F'n business and leave everyone else alone. Is that so hard?
This is a losing issue for Republicans and it is clear the election 4 weeks ago didn't wake any of you up.
As a baby it's cute & cuddly. As it grows it's a child, then a teen, then an adult. After it goes off to College and gets "educated" it turns into an imbecile.After fertilization, it is called a zygote. Then it becomes an embryo, then fetus, then a baby.
Yeah you did! You called it a "lame" issue and couldn't explain why?I didn't say anything about killing babies.
Uh, no... that was your cute little trick because you couldn't explain what's lame about defending the lives of unborn babies? So YOU changed the name to "embryos" which of course in your own warped nomenclature makes them perfectly fine to slaughter in the womb.now you are calling embryos children. That's cute.
Well I guess so? Can't explain what's "lame" about aborting babies? Call them "embryos". Problem solved.I guess we do live in times where we just change the definitions to suit our needs so Caitlyn Jenner is a woman.
Will all due respect, you may consider it that. I don't, and most don't. Its a fertilized cell. That's it. It has no feeling or cognition. Its a stage that lasts just a few days only a few days after conception...before anyone even knows they're pregnant. So, no one would even know they were pregnant at that point. The only thing that would stop that process would be a morning after pill.If I'm not wrong but a zygote is still considered life . When did it become acceptable to take life to make up for our mistakes? When did it become acceptable to take a innocent life to make our life's better?
The debate should be When does life begin. I believe scotus got it correct letting states decide.
I believe life begins at conception as I looked at my daughter's ultrasound, she's 8 weeks and it's a baby ..... that I will get to love and hold and watch the first smile ...
With all due respect to you, the miracle of a baby growing from a fertilized egg into a human being is more complex and intricate than even you understand! It's not about "Religion" (unless you believe all that happens by accident and is not by intelligent design) however even if you discard a "designer" of something so complex as a growing fertilized Zygote...at least "follow the science"!Will all due respect, you may consider it that. I don't, and most don't. Its a fertilized cell. That's it. It has no feeling or cognition. Its a stage that lasts just a few days only a few days after conception...before anyone even knows they're pregnant. So, no one would even know they were pregnant at that point. The only thing that would stop that process would be a morning after pill.
That to most is not life. And no one is defining what life is. Its a useless exercise for science let along when you introduce religion, which is based on whatever your particular religion believes I guess.
That said, I'm in favor of states rights as well. Let each state decide.
And as I and others have said, its a losing issue. Almost 2/3 of the US is in favor of abortion is some form. So, feel free to die on that hill, but its going to cloud other issues on which Reps have it right.
Well I don't live on the US/Mexico border, but I'm concerned who's illegally coming into this country unchecked and unvetted? I don't live in Southwest Atlanta, but I'm very worried about all the random shootings and indiscriminate killing that goes on in that part of my hometown daily? I don't know any N. Dakota sluts who can't keep their legs closed, but I sure as Hell don't want to pay for their abortions just because they don't know how to control themselves or they refuse to accept responsibility for their own sexual actions!Perhaps you can tell me how that affects your life because the best I can come up with is 1 less potential customer to purchase a vehicle in 16 years.
2/3 of the country dislike accountability for their free choice. If I was a politician who didn't believe in abortion I would leave religion out of it. Yes I would debate when life begins .Will all due respect, you may consider it that. I don't, and most don't. Its a fertilized cell. That's it. It has no feeling or cognition. Its a stage that lasts just a few days only a few days after conception...before anyone even knows they're pregnant. So, no one would even know they were pregnant at that point. The only thing that would stop that process would be a morning after pill.
That to most is not life. And no one is defining what life is. Its a useless exercise for science let along when you introduce religion, which is based on whatever your particular religion believes I guess.
That said, I'm in favor of states rights as well. Let each state decide.
And as I and others have said, its a losing issue. Almost 2/3 of the US is in favor of abortion is some form. So, feel free to die on that hill, but its going to cloud other issues on which Reps have it right.