ADVERTISEMENT

And magadons think they'll take up Trump's cases

Yep. I forget...who was it that told people to go back to work and open up the country in May of 2020?
Hi there! Remember me? The guy with the "loud mouth"?
iu
 
It's like Shane Lyon's being opposed to the NIL and Portal. Yeah... they suck... but damnit, you've got to wake up to the reality of the situation or you're going to be left behind.

Fuc#... at this point I'm worried the Dems will regain the House and maintain in the Senate... based on the behavior of House Republicans.
then republicans need to abandon the lame abortion issue. It killed them 4 weeks ago and it is going to kill them going forward.

btw. I agree. There is no way they let trump win
 
Tarheeler spent 4 years ahead of the curve on Russiagate and can't come to grips with the fact that they pulled out all the stops and poisoned the whole world to make sure Trump didn't get a second term. WTF
 
then republicans need to abandon the lame abortion issue. It killed them 4 weeks ago and it is going to kill them going forward.

btw. I agree. There is no way they let trump win
What is "lame" about defending innocent babies from being slaughtered limb by limb before they're born?

I know you won't answer, but isn't it interesting how casually you dismiss what abortion in reality is yet you can't as casually defend it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
He is the only Republican who has a chance. Anyone who is being honest understands that. Those that say otherwise are rooting for Biden or Newsome.



Polls said he had a chance in 2000 too, said we'd take the Senate in 2022 as well. I put zero faith in polls.

So let us vote and let's just see how many of us cause his defeat? Why the unprecedented effort to make sure we don't even get to vote for him? Seems to me they'd be encouraging as many of us to come out and vote for his defeat as they can find? Instead they don't even want him running just so he can lose?

I don't know.... maybe I'd rather not see President Biden in 2024, or worse, President Newsom?

It's all about winning. Period. If you think Trump gives the GOP the best chance at winning the White House in 2024, then great, you have your candidate. I don't. I think he seals it for the Dems and were left with an infighting GOP that accomplishes nothing because they've never learned how to win.
 
then republicans need to abandon the lame abortion issue. It killed them 4 weeks ago and it is going to kill them going forward.

btw. I agree. There is no way they let trump win

The evangelicals got their wish with abortion, and while I don't disagree with the logic of the ruling Scotus made, the "ban all abortion, no exception crowd" is costing the the party state and local elections. As well as probably cost the Senate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
Polls said he had a chance in 2000 too, said we'd take the Senate in 2022 as well. I put zero faith in polls.



I don't know.... maybe I'd rather not see President Biden in 2024, or worse, President Newsom?

It's all about winning. Period. If you think Trump gives the GOP the best chance at winning the White House in 2024, then great, you have your candidate. I don't. I think he seals it for the Dems and were left with an infighting GOP that accomplishes nothing because they've never learned how to win.

For those saying they won't let him win I will assume you mean they plan on cheating. I'll also assume you are ok with that.
 
For those saying they won't let him win I will assume you mean they plan on cheating. I'll also assume you are ok with that.

Cheating? If stuffing ballot boxes, pushing mail-in voting, late night ballot boxes appearing, harvesting, water leaks shutting down vote centers, etc. Then yes, they will use every shenanigan to win.

Am I okay with that? Fuc# no. But that's what's going to happen with Trump running. They'll stop at nothing to stop him.
 
  • Love
Reactions: TarHeelEer
Polls said he had a chance in 2000 too, said we'd take the Senate in 2022 as well. I put zero faith in polls.



I don't know.... maybe I'd rather not see President Biden in 2024, or worse, President Newsom?

It's all about winning. Period. If you think Trump gives the GOP the best chance at winning the White House in 2024, then great, you have your candidate. I don't. I think he seals it for the Dems and were left with an infighting GOP that accomplishes nothing because they've never learned how to win.
That's fine. Isn't it wonderful WE (the voters) get to decide? I'm concerned about all the attempts to smear him (Trump) and even keep him off the ballots! If everyone who's against him is so sure he can't win, why not just vote for the guy with the better policies to beat him? What's with all the Lawfare, and ballot harvesting, and court trials and everything else trying to make sure he doesn't run or even keeping his supporters from voting for him?

I get it plenty of folks don't like Trump. Wouldn't their efforts however be better spent on getting behind the candidate who they think easily beats him instead of trying to make sure HE can't win?
 
Cheating? If stuffing ballot boxes, pushing mail-in voting, late night ballot boxes appearing, harvesting, water leaks shutting down vote centers, etc. Then yes, they will use every shenanigan to win.

Am I okay with that? Fuc# no. But that's what's going to happen with Trump running. They'll stop at nothing to stop him.
Yes they will do everything in their power to stop him except find a better candidate or better policies to beat him with. That's why they're doing all the rest of the caca, because otherwise they'd lose and they know it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
The evangelicals got their wish with abortion, and while I don't disagree with the logic of the ruling Scotus made, the "ban all abortion, no exception crowd" is costing the the party state and local elections. As well as probably cost the Senate.
Which abortions are OK with you?
 
For those saying they won't let him win I will assume you mean they plan on cheating. I'll also assume you are ok with that.
They have to cheat if they're going to win. They cannot offer Americans a better agenda or a better candidate than Trump and it drives them insane doing or saying insane things.
 
The evangelicals got their wish with abortion, and while I don't disagree with the logic of the ruling Scotus made, the "ban all abortion, no exception crowd" is costing the the party state and local elections. As well as probably cost the Senate.
Why is the other position on the Left...ie: unrestricted abortions at any time for any reason paid for by taxpayers... not costing Democrats in those same races? I'd argue it is, but it's not reported that way.

Still you rarely if ever see Leftists defending unlimited, unrestricted abortions at any time for any reason. In fact the official position of the Democrat party is no limits & no restrictions on abortion at any time for any reason! (that includes late term abortions) That is the official position of the Democrat party. How many Democrats do you see willing to defend that position, or even admit that IS their position?

Ans: Zero.

If I'm wrong about that, post a prominent Democrat who admits they favor unrestricted access to abortion at any time for any reason including late term abortions. I'll wait to see who you link me to.
 
Last edited:
Why is the other position on the Left...ie: unrestricted abortions at any time for any reason paid for by taxpayers... not costing Democrats in those same races? I'd argue it is, but it's not reported that way.

Still you rarely if ever see Leftists defending unlimited, unrestricted abortions at any time for any reason. In fact the official position of the Democrat party is no limits & no restrictions on abortion at any time for any reason! (that includes late term abortions) That's is the official position of the Democrat party. How many Democrats do you see willing to defend that position, or even admit that IS their position?

Ans: Zero.

If I'm wrong about that, post a prominent Democrat who admits they favor unrestricted access to abortion at any time for any reason including late term abortions. I'll wait to see who you link me to.
Republicans need to learn word salad 101 . Democrats have the ability to word the debate to favor them on the emotional front .
Instead of debating "abortion " they need to debate " life" or when life begins. Democrats have worded as if men want to take women's rights away and people won't except that no matter the cost...
 
Cheating? If stuffing ballot boxes, pushing mail-in voting, late night ballot boxes appearing, harvesting, water leaks shutting down vote centers, etc. Then yes, they will use every shenanigan to win.

Am I okay with that? Fuc# no. But that's what's going to happen with Trump running. They'll stop at nothing to stop him.

Just Trump? You realize they are attacking their own now right? They will do the same to Manchin, Kennedy, or any moderate Republican.
 
They have to cheat if they're going to win. They cannot offer Americans a better agenda or a better candidate than Trump and it drives them insane doing or saying insane things.




 
Republicans need to learn word salad 101 . Democrats have the ability to word the debate to favor them on the emotional front .
Instead of debating "abortion " they need to debate " life" or when life begins. Democrats have worded as if men want to take women's rights away and people won't except that no matter the cost...
This is partially true. However what's almost never discussed is what abortion actually is? Women want the right to kill innocent babies they don't want. In 98% of the cases that's exactly what the Left is arguing for, but in 100% of the cases you will never hear them argue for that. NEVER.

Why have we allowed the heinous nature of abortions (which no one supports by the way...not even pro aborts) to get "word salad 101'd" out of the polemical lexicon? You realize that virtually no one on the Left who supports on demand, unrestricted abortion at any time for any reason, can honestly defend it? No one.

Why not? It's just "words" right? :rolleyes:

This is why abortion as it really is gets the "word salad" treatment:
Gosnell case raises concerns about the horror of abortions

excerpt:
“The bigger the baby, the more he charged.” That was abortionist Kermit Gosnell’s pricing plan. So when one woman came to him about seven or eight months pregnant, Gosnell charged her $2,500.

...more

Don't like "word salads"? How about real photos?

10 powerful photos that capture horrors of abortion

some common "tools" of the common abortionist
sub-buzz-2051-1516808865-1.jpg


*editor's note: there is a reason the gruesome realities of actual abortions are systematically kept out of the debate and off TV screens. It's a gruesome horrible procedure NO ONE would support if it were shown as prominently as protestors who demand unlimited access to it.

We have embraced as a society a "culture of death". :frown:
 
Last edited:
Tarheeler spent 4 years ahead of the curve on Russiagate and can't come to grips with the fact that they pulled out all the stops and poisoned the whole world to make sure Trump didn't get a second term. WTF

You're so close, but yet you can't see the tree from the forest in front of you.
 
This is partially true. However what's almost never discussed is what abortion actually is? Women want the right to kill innocent babies they don't want. In 98% of the cases that's exactly what the Left is arguing for, but in 100% of the cases you will never hear them argue for that. NEVER.

Why have we allowed the heinous nature of abortions (which no one supports by the way...not even pro aborts) to get "word salad 101'd" out of the polemical lexicon? You realize that virtually no one on the Left who supports on demand, unrestricted abortion at any time for any reason, can honestly defend it? No one.

Why not? It's just "words" right? :rolleyes:

This is why abortion as it really is gets the "word salad" treatment:
Gosnell case raises concerns about the horror of abortions

excerpt:
“The bigger the baby, the more he charged.” That was abortionist Kermit Gosnell’s pricing plan. So when one woman came to him about seven or eight months pregnant, Gosnell charged her $2,500.

...more

Don't like "word salads"? How about real photos?

10 powerful photos that capture horrors of abortion

some common "tools" of the common abortionist
sub-buzz-2051-1516808865-1.jpg


*editor's note: there is a reason the gruesome realities of actual abortions are systematically kept out of the debate and off TV screens. It's a gruesome horrible procedure NO ONE would support if it were shown as prominently as protestors who demand unlimited access to it.

We have embraced as a society a "culture of death". :frown:
I'm anti abortion pro life .
Republicans need to learn how the left words every topic or debate . In the abortion fight they need to debate when life begins to start with. Then debate the babies rights to life . That takes the women's rights off the table . Democrats know how to make plays on democracy.....they call themselves socialists fighting for democracy....yeah Republicans need to redefine the abortion fight from women's rights to the babies rights .
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
I'm anti abortion pro life .
Republicans need to learn how the left words every topic or debate . In the abortion fight they need to debate when life begins to start with. Then debate the babies rights to life . That takes the women's rights off the table . Democrats know how to make plays on democracy.....they call themselves socialists fighting for democracy....yeah Republicans need to redefine the abortion fight from women's rights to the babies rights .
I 100% agree with you...the baby's rights (particularly its right to Life) is never discussed in this debate. We have a poster in this thread who characterized the debate as "lame" but when he was asked what exactly is "lame" about defending an innocent baby's life from wanton slaughter he left the thread. What you say here @roadtrasheer is of course correct but as I mentioned, as a culture we have embraced "death" so the innocent Life of the baby you so eloquently pointed out in your post is not allowed to be discussed in this debate!

You and I being Pro Life know why the baby's life is never allowed to be part of this discussion. It's because the pro death crowd would lose the debate. 🤔
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
I 100% agree with you...the baby's rights (particularly its right to Life) is never discussed in this debate. We have a poster in this thread who characterized the debate as "lame" but when he was asked what exactly is "lame" about defending an innocent baby's life from wanton slaughter he left the thread. What you say here @roadtrasheer is of course correct but as I mentioned, as a culture we have embraced "death" so the innocent Life of the baby you so eloquently pointed out in your post is not allowed to be discussed in this debate!

You and I being Pro Life know why the baby's life is never allowed to be part of this discussion. It's because the pro death crowd would lose the debate. 🤔
Culture of death.....explains mass shootings more so than evil AR style weapons. Reasoning and accountability.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Culture of death.....explains mass shootings more so than evil AR style weapons. Reasoning and accountability.....
@roadtrasheer almost every night here in Atlanta, there are multiple shootings and deaths. Typically over drugs or territorial gang disputes, but also over silly sh*t. Just the other day, a 14 year old boy was shot over an argument that broke out at a local convenience store! An argument! The same type we used to get into fist fights over when we were teens, are now settled with gunfire and death.

This is what the "culture of death" has reaped...and we have sown it with our disregard for Life in its infancy.

For what a man reaps he sows. Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Gal 6: 7-8
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
The evangelicals got their wish with abortion, and while I don't disagree with the logic of the ruling Scotus made, the "ban all abortion, no exception crowd" is costing the the party state and local elections. As well as probably cost the Senate.
I admit I haven't paid much attention to this but who is trying to ban all abortions no exceptions?
 
If I was ahead of the curve then, what makes you think I'm not now?
I'll try to honestly and respectfully answer that. You think the election is all about Trump. It isn't. Sure he's the object, but this is so much more about the type of country we're facing if he's not elected. Why you don't see that and instead think it's only about him, his tweets, his ego, his image, etc is as surprising to me as it is disappointing.

As I said earlier I thought you were better informed and more aware of how our Freedoms and way of Life are under direct assault? You have not only confused me with your pointless Trump bashing, but I feel sorry that you have allowed your obvious personal dislike of him to cloud your analysis of how the Left is not only attempting to destroy him but the rest of the country too!

They don't hate Trump. They hate us. If they destroy him, how much longer do you think we and ultimately America have? You need to wake up and figure out who's side you're on?
 
Last edited:
I'll try to honestly and respectfully answer that. You think the election is all about Trump. It isn't. Sure he's the object, but this is so much more about the type of country we're facing if he's not elected. Why you don't see that and instead think it's only about him, his tweets, his ego, his image, etc is as surprising to me as it is disappointing.

As I said earlier I thought you were better informed and more aware of how our Freedoms and way of Life are under direct assault? You have not only confused me with your pointless Trump bashing, but I feel sorry that you have allowed your obvious personal dislike of him to cloud your analysis of how the Left is not only attempting to destroy him but the rest of the country too!

They don't hate Trump. They hate us. If they destroy him, how much longer do you think we and ultimately America has? You need to wake up and figure out who's side you're on?

Laura Ingraham basically just said the same thing. Also repeated what I said about they will do this to whoever comes after Trump. Called out Republicans who haven't defended him. But she's probably not "conservative" enough for Chicom Coop.
 
Laura Ingraham basically just said the same thing. Also repeated what I said about they will do this to whoever comes after Trump. Called out Republicans who haven't defended him. But she's probably not "conservative" enough for Chicom Coop.
I didn't see Ingraham's take on this election, but if she said something similar to what I posted to @TarHeelEer , I agree with her 100%.

Our country is under assault. We are being invaded. Anyone who doesn't understand this obviously doesn't care, or actually prefers to see America collapse or ultimately defeated. We're fighting for our country, not Trump.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny46
I didn't see Ingraham's take on this election, but if she said something similar to what I posted to @TarHeelEer , I agree with her 100%.

Our country is under assault. We are being invaded. Anyone who doesn't understand this obviously doesn't care, or actually prefers to see America collapse or ultimately defeated. We're fighting for our country, not Trump.

I'm voting for Trump. Why? Because what they have done to him can't be allowed to stand. I say that knowing I don't agree with him on everything. But that's where alot of people are. Nothing anymore posts here is going to change that for me or them. The days are coming when they wish they had Trump back.

 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
I'll try to honestly and respectfully answer that. You think the election is all about Trump. It isn't. Sure he's the object, but this is so much more about the type of country we're facing if he's not elected. Why you don't see that and instead think it's only about him, his tweets, his ego, his image, etc is as surprising to me as it is disappointing.

As I said earlier I thought you were better informed and more aware of how our Freedoms and way of Life are under direct assault? You have not only confused me with your pointless Trump bashing, but I feel sorry that you have allowed your obvious personal dislike of him to cloud your analysis of how the Left is not only attempting to destroy him but the rest of the country too!

They don't hate Trump. They hate us. If they destroy him, how much longer do you think we and ultimately America have? You need to wake up and figure out who's side you're on?
Voted for Trump twice....
If the charges they are bringing in NYC don't show you what they are doing you are real slow or eat up with TDS.
 
They don't hate Trump. They hate us. If they destroy him, how much longer do you think we and ultimately America have? You need to wake up and figure out who's side you're on?
They hate Trump and us. That isn't for the same reasons. They hate Trump because he slowed their efforts down by being elected in 2016. They hate us because of our beliefs. Trump does not share those beliefs. Why not try to elect someone who will fight the swamp with our beliefs?

Your biggest issue-abortion. Trump doesn't align with you. How do you reconcile?
 
They hate Trump and us. That isn't for the same reasons. They hate Trump because he slowed their efforts down by being elected in 2016. They hate us because of our beliefs. Trump does not share those beliefs. Why not try to elect someone who will fight the swamp with our beliefs?

Your biggest issue-abortion. Trump doesn't align with you. How do you reconcile?

Abortion is a State issue now. Trump isn't running for Governor.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT