You generalize way too much. You should know much better than that, just from the struggles that men and women have faced in this nation alone.
24 Sex allegations that CNN ignored
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
I'm glad you and I don't get to decide these issues boomer because we can agree to disagree. But the voters ultimately make their choices and so far they've chosen correctly against most of what Leftists actually support.
Oh I agree with the problem don't get me wrong boom but I favor merit-based hiring not hiring based on color or gender or any other class that the Left loves to promote.
Then I'm glad you agree with me that Socialist command and control economies don't work boom nice job!
Damn Boomer I need to scrum with you more often.
I just closed on two different sales while we were going back and forth. A 4 X4 Lariat worth about 57K and an F-150 worth about 37K.
That's almost a 100K from just two transactions talking to my man Boomer!
Commission checks will be sweet
I just closed on two different sales while we were going back and forth. A 4 X4 Lariat worth about 57K and an F-150 worth about 37K.
That's almost a 100K from just two transactions talking to my man Boomer!
Commission checks will be sweet
Last edited:
I meant your generalizations about “leftists”. You should know better than to make large assumptions about a group of people.
I didn't see this answer earlier because I was busy making money and generating my own personal wealth but where in this is the correct answer to the question?
The question was what percent of the total taxes do the top 10% of all wage earners pay (the rich) and is that their fare share? If it's not, how much more beyond that does the Left think they should pay?
I don't see any hard numbers in this answer to that question. So that's either an "I don't know" or "I can't answer that.
Every thing about the Left that I generalize boom you either deny they believe it or refuse to believe it. Like you said you didn't believe most Leftists blame America or think it is the reason for a lot of the Evil in the World. You said you don't believe that, but you're not listening to your side of this debate.
You also said you don't believe most Democrats want Socialism for the rest of the country. However you didn't specify where they disagree with what Socialists ultimately want... total Government control.
Last edited:
So people who pay loans on homes and cars with lien holders when they pay those bills they own those assets boom? The jobs they hold are theirs? Think about your answer as it relates to what wealth is and who owns it?
America is wealthy...but it is not for sale. The sum total of America's assets and the real value they hold make it wealthy. A person can own a home that is not for sale and just because there is no buyer does not diminish the value of that asset boom. Wealth exists as a stand alone value of a tangible asset no matter if there is a buyer or if it's for sale.
Last edited:
Sorrry boom...missed some this today and trying to get caught up.
Short answer a part of fixed costs to any good or service provider who needs employees to deliver the goods or services.
No they don't. There aren't buyers if the skills don't match. They negotiate wages for their skills in exchange for compensation. They have nothing else to "sell". If skill sets don't match, there is no negotiation (buyer).
Of course not...but in determining one's net worth (or a company) they are crucial.
True...but first it must be generated and quantified as a hard asset with value. That only happens when an individual or company adds value to that asset by engaging in commerce...which typically involves using profits generated to build the asset. Unless there is Capital formed to first initiate and then grow that asset...there can be no wealth generated.
Short answer a part of fixed costs to any good or service provider who needs employees to deliver the goods or services.
No they don't. There aren't buyers if the skills don't match. They negotiate wages for their skills in exchange for compensation. They have nothing else to "sell". If skill sets don't match, there is no negotiation (buyer).
Of course not...but in determining one's net worth (or a company) they are crucial.
True...but first it must be generated and quantified as a hard asset with value. That only happens when an individual or company adds value to that asset by engaging in commerce...which typically involves using profits generated to build the asset. Unless there is Capital formed to first initiate and then grow that asset...there can be no wealth generated.
Last edited:
It is...but it doesn't sit idle boom. It's usually invested. Why? to add to its value. This is where most companies get their capital to grow their assets. This is the dynamic of how wealth is generated.
Seriously just stop it.
I have you an
I have you an
are you being serious? I was on here for an hour answering your questions. Don’t be a little bitch, give respect when it’s earned.
boom my Man I gave you credit for hanging in there didn't I?
Most of your friends on the Left would have bailed by now. If you don't like what I'm pointing out as errors in your answers OK...but stop claiming I'm being overly aggressive or unfair to you or arrogant. I'm simply reading your answers and responding to them. Just say we disagree. We do...and that's fine.
You are the one still going. I never was under the illusion that you would agree with most of my answers, were you?
The whole point was that I have no problem standing on the line, because my beliefs aren’t derived from talking points like you think. I read, study, discuss, and form my beliefs over legitimate thought and consideration of opposite viewpoints.
The question was what do Democrats believe differently than Socialists if they are not?
For instance Socialists believe in taxing wealth and redistributing it to lower classes in order to make incomes more even. Do Democrats also believe that or reject it?
First answer is No.
Second answer is you are not defending what Leftists believe...you are trying to explain alternative evaluations of my questions but you refuse to admit what Leftists actually believe. I understand why, but you don't see what you are doing by just answering the questions the way you think doesn't call out your Leftist ideology.
It exposes the weakness of your beliefs because you try to assert you don't believe what Leftists do yet you are unable to articulate where you disagree with them.
Honest question:
You think I should give you ANY respect after a disrespectful post like that? In which you make assumptions about my beliefs (in contrast to what I post), all in an attempt to assert that either people think like you, or they think like “all leftists”?
You stated Leftists don't believe the things I suggested. If I'm wrong about what Leftists actually believe where is my error? I only commented on what YOUR answers were to my questions. You have not and do not articulate where you disagree with their beliefs relative to your stated positions boom.
All I can go on is what they say they believe. If you disagree with them, what is it over?
Honest answer boom. I simply repeat what Leftists say they believe (or don't) for instance you do not believe the Founding Fathers were talking of the Judeo Christian God of the Bible in the Constitution when they outlined where our rights came from.
That's fine. But did I mischaracterize your answer? You told me what you think they meant and I simply countered with what they said. Socialists don't believe any of it and if you disagree with them on that what is your disagreement with them? They don't believe in the Judeo Christian God the Founding Fathers mentioned and neither do you.
Where am I wrong boomer?
Jefferson believed in a Christian God, but was smart enough to write the Declaration to encompass all beliefs....including atheism and agnosticism. Thomas Paine was a founding father, was he not? Again you’re generalizing.
No I am not I'm being very specific my friend. I specifically asked you where our rights come from? The founding Fathers specifically codified that source by calling that source our Creator. They didn't say plural, they didn't say "energy" they didn't say anything other than one source who they meant to be the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob found in the Bible.
They didn't say it was a King or any other entity. They didn't say "Christian God" true, but it was clear in the Federalist papers they meant the God of the Bible.
Now, as I stated, Socialists and Leftists who identify with it (Socialism) do NOT believe that is the source of our rights because they do not believe in "A" God per se.
They think our natural rights are insured by Government and are authorized by it. As I understand you, you also do not believe in "A" God. You prefer to call it "energy" or some other such entity. That's fine. But the Founders didn't say that, and they do not believe our rights emanate from anywhere else except our Creator (singular)
I asked you where you disagree with the Socialists on this and your answer is not consistent with what either they believe or what the Founders believed. I am not generalizing.
Last edited:
I don’t make the same assumptions you do....and I certainly don’t have the same definitions of such general words like “leftists” as you do....so how do I answer such a stupid question. Your rambling debate questions at one point target the beliefs of Democrats, mixed with “leftists”, socialists, and of course my own personal beliefs.
I answered you as best I could, honestly, from my own personal beliefs and knowledge.....and you claim I’m either faking or trying to cater to your personal viewpoints of what is right. Why would I ever fake my beliefs for the likes of you? I’m not impressed with your intellect. I’m not impressed with your beliefs. I have not one reason to cater to your ideology or your idea of what mine should be. I find your entire approach manipulative and lacking any real substance.
I've been asking you what their differences are since I see them all essentially believing varying degrees of the same thing. Socialists believe the State is supreme in Human affairs. No God. You don't believe in God....and I find few Leftists who do either especially when it comes to the supremacy of the State.
Last edited:
I don't see him as a signatory to the Declaration boom.
Historian Richard B. Morris in 1973 identified the following seven figures as the key Founding Fathers: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington
I already answered that...
The original draft didn’t use the word Creator, an adaptation from Adams used the phrase “in their creation”, and the final draft uses men.....by THEIR creator
That’s absolutely plural....each man’s creator, being something different to the individual. Go ahead and rail against the beauty and genius of our Declaration - Constitution - and founders if you will.....but I prefer to illuminate their genius, not smother it in my own personal religious beliefs.
That's fine boomer...but all the while you are characterizing the intent behind my questions and choosing to answer them the way you see fit, all I'm doing is evaluating your answers. You're defining to me all that you are guilty of...disrespect (the name calling) assumptions not based on solid beliefs (the energy thingy) arrogance (your answer about wealth creation and generation) etc.
I'm trying to have a dialogue respectfully so I can examine your beliefs, but you insist I'm trying to prove I'm smarter than you. I'm asking questions and you are answering them...that dynamic is what this thread shows it to be.
Last edited:
I'll honestly accept that answer because you are 100% correct they did not specify ANY Religion. But you are just mistaken if you think they were referring to any other God besides the one identified in the Bible. If you teach your students anything else, you Sir are in error.
