24 Sex allegations that CNN ignored
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
So is that the way you encourage debate and open thoughts with your students?
You said that is how you run your classroom was that true?
You said that a service provided by a laborer is not sold to an employer because the market is determined by the employer (or some such fluff)—its the same for assets, an asset is worthless is there is no market for it.
1) is this a fvcking classroom?
2) can’t take my answers to your loaded (catch me some liberal bs) questions, so you go to this bullshit? Fvcking pussy.
Didn’t see this question amongst the massive vomit of self serving psychological red flags that you threw up all over the thread.....
I think generating wealth through entrepreneurial investment is a very strong aspect of our economy. I don’t think it’s the only way to supply or support an economy. I think it’s best to diversify our economy as much as possible.
No.
You do realize China has private investment private corporations a stock market and allows individual wealth accumulation.
China's political class runs the parameters under which the economy operates but it is not a true command-and-control economy.
The Chinese government owns a lot of the private corporations in that they are not chartered to specifically hold wealth unto themselves but they operate in much the same way nationalized corporations in other non-socialist countries do.
I think deficits are caused by not having enough revenue to cover spending. I personally believe we spend too much. But in every area in which I think spending is too high, someone with more knowledge of the area tells me it’s not. I don’t think the answer is that simple. Education, for example, most would say spending is too high, but I think it’s too low. So then revenue need to be boosted. I think we need to re-evaluate our priorities, mich like I have on my personal budget over the years.
Democrats favor spending in areas that need help, and most advocate for cuts in other areas.
Natural rights are right derived from our existence, not rights as determined by a ruling figure (such as a king, in the minds of our founders).
By our creator can mean more than you desire it to mean. To me, it refers to energy and the source of energy from which I was created by displacement.... that I may never truly know. It can mean a vastly different thing to others.
Well at least you did didn't disappoint me on the name calling portion of how I predicted you would handle these questions.
Estate taxes are a tax on the transfer of wealth, and constitutional in the sense that they were upheld by the SC several times I believe.
More revenue mean more money to fix things, that’s why Dems don’t want it going anywhere, IMO.
Can you name some cuts that Democrats have generally been in favor of in recent years?
I'm just listening to your answers Boomer what you choose to answer and how you choose to Define it is up to you I'm simply responding to how you're answering what I've asked.
And you didn’t disappoint me in not recognizing the fact that I answered everyone of your questions (unless there are more lost in the muck), but you have no credit for it.....and simply move on to the fact that I’m a namecaller (which is another generalized label that you use to seemingly set yourself apart from liberals). Yet, you started by calling me Professor in an attempt to belittle my intellect as it stood cowering in your massive shadow of brilliance. Ah, but your not a namecaller are you? No no no, you are righteous and pure. Brilliant man of god that bashes all liberals under his might of mind.
Hey chubbs, you’re bullshit. In case you didn’t know. (And by the way - I call you chubbs because it fits your obtuse nature of debate, i I can’t really think of a decent nickname for ATL.
I don’t doubt that no one.....left or right.....had the patience to read through this excercise in personal bias and vanity. But if anyone from the right did read it.....
Please tell chubbs he was absolutely wrong in this interchange. Not in the concepts and the validity of the answers. But in the fact that he challenged me to answer questions, I answered them legitimately (not all of us believe the same things)....and he gives no credit.
And that the Professor response was the first example of namecallong in this thread from me or him. And that he’s just as derogatory as I am in his posts.
He needs the realization for growth
Please tell chubbs he was absolutely wrong in this interchange. Not in the concepts and the validity of the answers. But in the fact that he challenged me to answer questions, I answered them legitimately (not all of us believe the same things)....and he gives no credit.
And that the Professor response was the first example of namecallong in this thread from me or him. And that he’s just as derogatory as I am in his posts.
He needs the realization for growth
So by that answer I gather you disagree with how the founding Fathers defined where natural rights come from?
I missed that part of the Constitution where you found your answer. Can you recite it for me?
This is just you trying to shove your morality onto others. You have no shame. You are a flaming hypocrite.
This is one answer I do agree with you on so then tell me why does the Left insist that America is the source of evil in most of the world?
You're simply redefining it from what the founders intended it to mean and you are certainly free to do that but you cannot say that they miss defined what they meant it to be as the source of our rights.
Honestly as a teacher I really did think you knew how wealth was generated and measured and who owns it.
I don’t think many from the left do. I think many from the left believe we done our dirt, same as most nations. That our hands aren’t totally clean
No ! The founding Fathers were very specific over who they gave that title to because they said all rights were endowed by that entity.
But if by your own admission we've been a source for good why does the Left insist otherwise?
The founders believed in freedom of religion. The Declaration was a formal delivery of our break from the nation of England and the King that ruled. Creator was used as the source of our natural rights....creator not king....of the founding fathers wanted that line to be more specific they would have been.....God was not the word used, nor was there any reference to Jesus, or the Bible. It was yet another example of the genius of Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams — and the concept of America which is the land of liberty for all (not just those that believe in your God)
Then China was not the proper response to my question since they are not a command-and-control economy.
So what energy were they speaking of if they weren't referring to the Judeo-Christian God found in the Bible?
Yes! They were general, because they were American (even before the nation was formed). Read about Franklin’s theories of existence.
