ADVERTISEMENT

Wow, the mighty Errs are killing it in the Big XII

Except that it was far more attended and had a much higher tv rating than the yawn-fest between Marshall and Uconn.

You can thank ASU fans for living on the West coast and being able to stay up to watch it. Other than hillbilly Err fans, people on the East coast either fell asleep watching or went to bed.
 
You can thank ASU fans for living on the West coast and being able to stay up to watch it. Other than hillbilly Err fans, people on the East coast either fell asleep watching or went to bed.

St. Petersburg Marshall-Connecticut 14,652 -12,023 2.400*
Cactus West Virginia-Arizona State 39,321 3,912 3.699

Attendance was down over 12000 to 14,600 for your game. That's close to 50% less than the year before.

Attendance was up about 10% over the year before for our game.

You drew a 2.4M people on TV, we drew 3.7M. So we drew maore than 50% more viewers than you did, despite being a late West coast game.

So if everybody on the east coast fell asleep or went to bed, what is your excuse for only drawing 2/3's of the viewers we did?

 
St. Petersburg Marshall-Connecticut 14,652 -12,023 2.400*
Cactus West Virginia-Arizona State 39,321 3,912 3.699

Attendance was down over 12000 to 14,600 for your game. That's close to 50% less than the year before.

Attendance was up about 10% over the year before for our game.

You drew a 2.4M people on TV, we drew 3.7M. So we drew maore than 50% more viewers than you did, despite being a late West coast game.

So if everybody on the east coast fell asleep or went to bed, what is your excuse for only drawing 2/3's of the viewers we did?


So you totally dodge the fact that your game didn't end until the wee hours of the morning and realistically you lost everyone viewing on the East coast, because no one would care enough about the game to stay up and watch it?

When backed into a corner, just say something about Marshall. The Ear way.
 
So you totally dodge the fact that your game didn't end until the wee hours of the morning and realistically you lost everyone viewing on the East coast, because no one would care enough about the game to stay up and watch it?

When backed into a corner, just say something about Marshall. The Ear way.

link?
 
So you totally dodge the fact that your game didn't end until the wee hours of the morning and realistically you lost everyone viewing on the East coast, because no one would care enough about the game to stay up and watch it?

Show that supposed "fact"...

Also, you all should thank Western Michigan and Middle Tennessee State from keeping Marshall and Uconn out of last place. Any excuses for that fact?
 
It's called common sense. You need a link that proves you should piss in your toilet and not around it?

You said it was a fact and you have no clue, whatsoever. Your statement is nothing more than your dream in that little delusional world of Marshall fans. It's what keeps you all happy as Marshall sinks into the bottom of the pits of mediocrity.
 
So you totally dodge the fact that your game didn't end until the wee hours of the morning and realistically you lost everyone viewing on the East coast, because no one would care enough about the game to stay up and watch it?

When backed into a corner, just say something about Marshall. The Ear way.

How did I dodge anything? I just posted the facts ... sorry you don't like them.

But since you say I dodged it, let's go ahead and address it.
There were 19 bowls that received less viewers than ours. That's 50% of the bowls. How many of them were late night West Coast games that may have lost East Coast viewers? Since we still did better than half of the other bowls, it's fair to assume we would have done even better with a different time slot. (you yourself are admitting as much)

I'm not sure how you can claim "no one would care enough to stay up and watch it" when apparently there were STILL enough people that cared about the game to outdraw half of the other bowls.

I'd say that means we are a pretty good draw.

I'd also have to ask what that says about the attractiveness of all of those other bowls that had favorable time slots?

Marshall fans come on here and criticize us about this and that, but we aren't supposed to compare the topic to Marshall? How exactly does that work? In your confusing logic, would it somehow make more sense for us to make a comparison to VT? And what does anything mean without a relative comparison to something else?

Even with all of that, I'm not sure what logic you're using to try to use the starting time of our bowl game against us. We don't control what time the game starts.

And again, if anything, if you couple the starting time with the data from the other bowls, the only conclusion to be drawn is a positive one regarding the attractiveness of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcb and 30CAT
Except that it was far more attended and had a much higher tv rating than the yawn-fest between Marshall and Uconn.
Should have been since ASU was playing at home....didn't see many Mounties in the crowd though! And a very god thing ASU's head coach struggles with basic math.
 
How did I dodge anything? I just posted the facts ... sorry you don't like them.

But since you say I dodged it, let's go ahead and address it.
There were 19 bowls that received less viewers than ours. That's 50% of the bowls. How many of them were late night West Coast games that may have lost East Coast viewers? Since we still did better than half of the other bowls, it's fair to assume we would have done even better with a different time slot. (you yourself are admitting as much)

I'm not sure how you can claim "no one would care enough to stay up and watch it" when apparently there were STILL enough people that cared about the game to outdraw half of the other bowls.

I'd say that means we are a pretty good draw.

I'd also have to ask what that says about the attractiveness of all of those other bowls that had favorable time slots?

Marshall fans come on here and criticize us about this and that, but we aren't supposed to compare the topic to Marshall? How exactly does that work? In your confusing logic, would it somehow make more sense for us to make a comparison to VT? And what does anything mean without a relative comparison to something else?

Even with all of that, I'm not sure what logic you're using to try to use the starting time of our bowl game against us. We don't control what time the game starts.

And again, if anything, if you couple the starting time with the data from the other bowls, the only conclusion to be drawn is a positive one regarding the attractiveness of the game.

Did you think I would take the time to bother reading all that? I hope not. I skimmed through and the part where you think you are supposed to give comparisons to Marshall is where you are obviously confused. How are we responsible for any of your shortcomings? You are barely over 0.500 in conference record since joining the Big XII. Your rebuttal is, "yeah well, 0-12." What does Marshall have to do with your conference record? The fact that we are Marshall fans doesn't dismiss you from staying on the topic and addressing the facts.
 
You said it was a fact and you have no clue, whatsoever. Your statement is nothing more than your dream in that little delusional world of Marshall fans. It's what keeps you all happy as Marshall sinks into the bottom of the pits of mediocrity.

No, you are delusional if you dont realize that the attendance of your bowl game was because of it being a virtual home game for ASU.
 
No, you are delusional if you dont realize that the attendance of your bowl game was because of it being a virtual home game for ASU.

No...You're delusional, because he was talking about tv viewership.

As for it being a home game for ASU....That means WVU won its bowl game, on the road @ ASU. Even a more impressive feat.
 
No...You're delusional, because he was talking about tv viewership.

As for it being a home game for ASU....That means WVU won its bowl game, on the road @ ASU. Even a more impressive feat.


Yeah, because ASU was such an impressive team this year. You have discussed the attendance of the game, as well, so dont act as if that wasnt a part of the topic.
 
Yeah, because ASU was such an impressive team this year. You have discussed the attendance of the game, as well, so dont act as if that wasnt a part of the topic.

I did talk about it, but it had nothing to do with your first response to me. Nothing. Don't backtrack now and try to pretend it did.

Also, don't pretend the rivers of delusion don't flow through Herd nation. You all are over here actually bragging about having 10 wins in, for all intents and purposes, an FCS conference....A conference ASU and WVU would have easily came out of with 10 wins, and likely undefeated, with Marshall's entire schedule.
 
Last edited:
Did you think I would take the time to bother reading all that? I hope not. I skimmed through and the part where you think you are supposed to give comparisons to Marshall is where you are obviously confused. How are we responsible for any of your shortcomings? You are barely over 0.500 in conference record since joining the Big XII. Your rebuttal is, "yeah well, 0-12." What does Marshall have to do with your conference record? The fact that we are Marshall fans doesn't dismiss you from staying on the topic and addressing the facts.
Ahem....MOOU doesn't have fans, Moo-tards are ****NOIDS IN HUMAN ATTIRE. .just an honest ASSessment of total,absolutely complete DICK HOLES. ...
 
I did talk about it, but it had nothing to do with your first response to me. Nothing. Don't backtrack now and try to pretend it did.

Also, don't pretend the rivers of delusion don't flow through Herd nation. You all are over here actually bragging about having 10 wins in, for all intents and purposes, an FCS conference....A conference ASU and WVU would have easily came out of with 10 wins, and likely undefeated, with Marshall's entire schedule.

Yes, it did have to do with my response.

Have you seen your board? You have a thread where posters are talking about how you are about to get into the AAU, and how the academic ground work for acceptance into the B1G is in place. You also have people trying to say that the ACC called begging you to join, but it just so happened after you accepted a spot in the big twelve.
 
Yes, it did have to do with my response.

Have you seen your board? You have a thread where posters are talking about how you are about to get into the AAU, and how the academic ground work for acceptance into the B1G is in place. You also have people trying to say that the ACC called begging you to join, but it just so happened after you accepted a spot in the big twelve.

What the?
 
Yes, it did have to do with my response.

Have you seen your board? You have a thread where posters are talking about how you are about to get into the AAU, and how the academic ground work for acceptance into the B1G is in place. You also have people trying to say that the ACC called begging you to join, but it just so happened after you accepted a spot in the big twelve.
This is a lie. You should stop trying to read subject lines. You look like a fool.
 
Did you think I would take the time to bother reading all that? I hope not. I skimmed through and the part where you think you are supposed to give comparisons to Marshall is where you are obviously confused. How are we responsible for any of your shortcomings? You are barely over 0.500 in conference record since joining the Big XII. Your rebuttal is, "yeah well, 0-12." What does Marshall have to do with your conference record? The fact that we are Marshall fans doesn't dismiss you from staying on the topic and addressing the facts.

Well, if you think I'm going to explain it again, then I can't help you.

I don't even know where you're getting these talking points now because the topic at hand was bowl attendance and viewership.

I didn't mention 0-12, and our conference record wasn't part of the discussion. Where you got the idea that Marshall is responsible for our shortcomings defies all logic. Marshall has ZERO impact on WVU.

My last post stayed on topic and addressed the facts ... clearly those facts destroyed your argument so now you're rambling about a bunch of shit that had nothing to do with the topic.
 
It's called common sense. You need a link that proves you should piss in your toilet and not around it?

So you use "fact" over and over again, but when asked to prove your "facts" you dodge the question.

Do you understand the difference between fact and opinion? It doesn't seem as if you do.
 
I realize that your IQ is below room temperature of an igloo but none of the 2017 class is playing for WVU because they are all still playing in high school you idiot fuktard.
If she isn't a hypocrite (very unlikely), then 30Puss is going to throw a tantrum because you used "is" after "none," as I would have done. She will be very disappointed in you, but won't admit the obvious because she's a fraud.
 
If she isn't a hypocrite (very unlikely), then 30Puss is going to throw a tantrum because you used "is" after "none," as I would have done. She will be very disappointed in you, but won't admit the obvious because she's a fraud.
Grammar nazi=Marshall grad. Nobody cares moron.
 
I realize that your IQ is below room temperature of an igloo but none of the 2017 class is playing for WVU because they are all still playing in high school you idiot fuktard.

You're lack of reading comprehension and then your failure at trying to defend yourself is amazing. Its no wonder your IQ level has never gotten you past picking Orange Cones at the side if the road.

I was CLEARLY TALKING ABOUT THE CURRENT CROP OF 2017 HS Seniors that LAUGHED at WVU offer.
 
You're lack of reading comprehension and then your failure at trying to defend yourself is amazing. Its no wonder your IQ level has never gotten you past picking Orange Cones at the side if the road.

I was CLEARLY TALKING ABOUT THE CURRENT CROP OF 2017 HS Seniors that LAUGHED at WVU offer.
What did they do to the Marshall offer?
 
Well 4 of them (Locklear, Stewart, Ross, Etheridge) all had us in their Top 5 and all will still take OVs this fall.

Dont remember seeing WVU in their final Top 5

Lol on Etheridge going to Marshall
Congrats on being "top "
 
You're lack of reading comprehension and then your failure at trying to defend yourself is amazing. Its no wonder your IQ level has never gotten you past picking Orange Cones at the side if the road.

I was CLEARLY TALKING ABOUT THE CURRENT CROP OF 2017 HS Seniors that LAUGHED at WVU offer.
You can yell your retarded head off imbecile but I can only respond to the words you write. Learn how to communicate. Lastly, forget the term IQ because those two letters should never leave your idiot mouth together.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT