In order to compete for something you have to play in the game for it. Once the Big 12 initiated the conference championship game, that is the game you have to compete in to win. WVU lost 2 games it shouldn't have and winning either would have made the loss to OU moot. We were out competed for the conference title by ISU using your logic. You are a complete idiot who refuses to face the facts. I can't call you a liar anymore because I legitimately do not think you can understand facts. WVU has no QBs this year and not even an entire offensive line. That's on Holgorsen. WVU always relied on transfers at the QB position despite it being the central cog to his "plan." Every good game or season he had was because a transfer came along ready to play without the need for development. Hard to be a good coach when you are not flipping coaching up the talent on the roster. WVU consistently had bad defense and defensive fundamentals under Holgorsen. Special teams were headed by a guy who was more clueless about the game than you for a majority of his tenure. WVU limped along as a gimmicky team that mostly whipped the poor, beat the average, and got blown out by the good. WVU was never a better team in November compared to late September under Holgorsen. These are all facts. Holgorsen is NOT a bad coach. He is just not one of the "greatest" and had glaring flaws. The biggest of which is laziness. That is a choice not a natural deficit since the man does have a gift for offensive design and play calling.
People that actually know sports disagree with you completely. The facts don't lie like you:
From Sports Illustrated
November 18, 2018
"
The Big 12 likes to tout its highly competitive, defensively challenged conference race as the only one in college football where “every game counts” because of its 10-team roster and round-robin schedule.
That premise has been slightly tainted by the league pinning its College Football Playoff hopes on one team in each of the past three seasons. Fortunately for the Big 12, Oklahoma has gone to the final four twice in the playoff’s four-year history, and after Saturday’s action, the Sooners are once again the league’s only hope of returning there in 2018.
Heading into the final week of the conference slate, the Big 12 officials got exactly what they bargained for: total chaos, with a cheat sheet needed to explain how three different teams could be eligible to play in the conference championship on Dec. 1........
....Despite a disappointing collapse in Stillwater, the scenario is the same for West Virginia. A week after winning a thriller against Texas, West Virginia met a salty Oklahoma State team with a chance to also stay relevant in the playoff chase. Instead, they blew a 17-point first half lead and left Stillwater with a 45–41 loss. Despite forcing four turnovers, the Mountaineer defense was lit up for a season-high 604 yards. Their Big 12 title hopes now rest with beating Oklahoma at home on Friday night, a team they have lost six straight to and hope that somehow Kansas can beat Texas if they fail to get it done against the Sooners.....
https://www.si.com/college-football/2018/11/18/big-12-title-game-oklahoma-texas-west-virginia
As we know, WVU lost to OU by 3 points despite a valiant effort. Had they won the FINAL game of the season they would have played for the BIG 12 championship. That means that YES Holgorsen had WVU in contention and competing for a BIG 12 championship up until the final game of last season.
Unfortunately they met a few better teams in this tough conference and didn't make it--but 3 or 4 pts made the difference.
Now? WVU is getting blown out by Missouri, tossing 4 interceptions to Texas, missing kicks, barely eking out wins over fcs squads, etc. etc.---and all is good with you because you helped chase out the second winningest coach in WVU history.