It isn't a political message that is used/tied to a political candidate like MAGA. It is considered a "social" statement. My point is fact.
The Woke NFL Hypocrites
- Thread starter bornaneer
- Start date
It's was a Marxist Political Movement as described by It's founders. That's the fact and the video of them saying so was posted here multiple times.
Ok.....again, read what I said carefully and the light bulb will come on.......
And was the Civil Rights Movement a "socialist" movement? (think before answering)
Right. The guys who wrote the rules consider BLM a social statement so the nfl can pimp it..
It is also a very political statement.
It's was a political far left movement to create division in our Country. They didn't care about Black Lives.
Yep. Can you link me where it said they refused those phrases? Appreciate it man.
I did.....and no results that back up your claim. All I'm asking is to provide a link that proves your statement is legit. What's wrong with providing one?
(But I think we all know why you won't)
Maybe you used the wrong wording...Keep trying...it's there.
(But I think we all know why you won't)
J
Just for kicks Dude...I found it again...Hint...try different wording. But really,it's ok.
Here...I'll make this very easy for you:
Are NFL players allowed to put "All Lives Matter" on their helmets?
The Democrat party doesn't care anything about how "black lives matter"...in that loser party only "black votes matter" and if any blacks vote against them they're suddenly branded as either "non black" or worse "Uncle Toms".
When have Democrats ever supported such important Black thinkers like Thomas Sowell, Candace Owens, Professor Walter Williams, or Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas? Are they not as "black" as folks like Barrack Obama or Kamala Harris? (both of whom are not "black" per se)
Democrats give lip service to the BLM movement, precisely because it helps power their political agenda...which unarguably is Socialist in both nature and intent. Black folks who don't sign onto to that Socialist agenda are as useless to today's loser Democrats as Harris/Walz bumper stickers. 🤣
When have Democrats ever supported such important Black thinkers like Thomas Sowell, Candace Owens, Professor Walter Williams, or Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas? Are they not as "black" as folks like Barrack Obama or Kamala Harris? (both of whom are not "black" per se)
Democrats give lip service to the BLM movement, precisely because it helps power their political agenda...which unarguably is Socialist in both nature and intent. Black folks who don't sign onto to that Socialist agenda are as useless to today's loser Democrats as Harris/Walz bumper stickers. 🤣
Duh. I believe I already posted they are allowed six messages. Now show me where the NFL treated a player unfair?
You said “why did the NFL BAN players” for having All Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter. I’m still waiting for those players who requested those and were denied.
Last edited:
Dude...Answer the question...Very simple...Yes or No.
I guess you have ZERO memory of the selection of the messages being allowed.
I painted you into a corner...that is why you won't answer.
Name the players that you claim were "banned" from their message. Thank you.
Do I remember? Yes. I also remember you guys going nuts over the kneeling, which I said (and others) wasn't a big deal because it will go away soon enough, and it did. Now you are tore up over small font letters on the back of a helmet that NOBODY can even see. If that isn't the definition of "woke", I don't know what is.
Again, this is a big nothing burger that you and your followers have dreamed up. Let it go man. Seriously. It's a bad look for you.
Last edited:
LOL...Me torn up ? You are the one that is torn up.
What the fuk is wrong with you...go back and read my OP. NEVER said that any players had their message banned from the back of a helmet. However, my implication is that the NFL does NOT allow ( in otherwise BANNED ) messages that are NOT approved.
Again if something IS NOT approved IT IS banned.
Just answer my question man. Seriously. It's a bad look for you.
I would say the Dude got all torn up over what Bosa did.
Anyone with half a brain knows that the BLM is a political movement.
Few posters on this board will frustrate you like that Dude. Best to move on. You're wasting your time getting him to either honestly answer you or just be honest! Admire your tenacity, but it's like wiping the crack of your ass...looks clean, but still stinks.
Remember, I refer to your posts as "wagon wheels" for a reason.
I can't help it that I'm right and the NFL did nothing wrong, and fined Bosa the same as they have others for uniform violations (as I showed previously). It's not my fault that you guys are so woke now that you have turned in to the things you hated 3-5 years ago. Deal with it better, and don't cry like a bunch of babies.
Stop the strawman. Nobody is saying the NFL is right or wrong. Rather, people are pointing out its hypocrisy for fining or tolerating political speech based on the viewpoint expressed. It is the same thing Twitter did and Facebook continues to do.
Remember, I refer to your posts as "wagon wheels" for a reason.
I can't help it that I'm right and the NFL did nothing wrong, and fined Bosa the same as they have others for uniform violations (as I showed previously). It's not my fault that you guys are so woke now that you have turned in to the things you hated 3-5 years ago. Deal with it better, and don't cry like a bunch of babies.
And spare me your lame fantasy that BLM isn't political. BLM acknowledges it is political on its own damn website.
If pointing out the hypocrisy equates to babies crying in your world, fine with me. Last Tuesday showed how out of touch you are.
And you fail to get it through your head that while "MAGA" is associated to the election of one man and candidates, the "BLM" is not (although you guys want to make it so). That's why the NFL allows one, and not the other. It is pretty simple.
I thought what they did with Bosa was petty. I do not agree that messages should be banned. I'm ok unless they are threatening in nature or obscene. I'm ok with what they have on helmets but they should allow others.If that was true, how come you were the one to start a thread about it?
Remember when I said I'm going to stop posting your lying ass? It was right after you lied about visiting me here in Atlanta and after you lied about knowing who I sleep with behind my Wife's back, and after you lied about showing up in Morgantown to meet me and prove it, and after you lied claiming you were a Christian, and after you lied claiming you had Black family members and after you lied claiming none of that's ever happened.
I don't prefer posting you because all you do is tell lies...so go tell your lies to some other posters.
Last edited:
Good Lord...what was that all about ? Someone has to be very sick to spread lies like that.Remember when I said I'm going to stop posting your lying ass? It was right after you lied about visiting me here in Atlanta and after you lied about knowing who I sleep with behind my Wife's back, and after you lied about showing up in Morgantown to meet me and prove it, and after you lied claiming you were a Christian, and after you lied claiming you had Black family members and after you lied claiming none of that's ever happened.
I don't prefer posting you anymore because all you do is tell lies...so go tell your lies to some other posters.
Remember when I said I'm going to stop posting your lying ass? It was right after you lied about visiting me here in Atlanta and after you lied about knowing who I sleep with behind my Wife's back, and after you lied about showing up in Morgantown to meet me and prove it, and after you lied claiming you were a Christian, and after you lied claiming you had Black family members and after you lied claiming none of that's ever happened.
I don't prefer posting you anymore because all you do is tell lies...so go tell your lies to some other posters.
Was it Sydney Sweeney? If so I'm not saying you should have but I understand.
MAGA = trump. Got it. The nfl wrote its rules to allow the political speech it agrees with but not others.
Earlier in this thread you said blm was allowed because it wasn’t political. lol
You agree that "All Lives Matter" and "Blue Lives Matter" should have been banned as they were ? That was the crux of the issue back in 2020.
Yet you posted me on another thread.....and I'm the "liar"? If we went back and looked, I'd bet you have threatened to "not post" me at least a dozen times......Remember when I said I'm going to stop posting your lying ass? It was right after you lied about visiting me here in Atlanta and after you lied about knowing who I sleep with behind my Wife's back, and after you lied about showing up in Morgantown to meet me and prove it, and after you lied claiming you were a Christian, and after you lied claiming you had Black family members and after you lied claiming none of that's ever happened.
I don't prefer posting you anymore because all you do is tell lies...so go tell your lies to some other posters.
I'm still waiting to see where the NFL was proposed with those phrases and they said "no". Right now, all I have seen is stories of them allowing the six phrases and nothing on them NOT allowing anything else. You would think that if a player/owner would have proposed those two phrases, and they were declined, it would have been out there on the Internet somewhere. Wouldn't you?
King was a believer in socialism........look it up.
In an early letter to Coretta, he wrote: 'I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic. '
Last edited:
Two sides to every story.....believe what you want. It doesn't bother me......I know the truth.
![[thumbsup]](https://res-1.cloudinary.com/rivals/image/upload/tpajusiw2imufeahiuam.png "Thumbs up [thumbsup]")
Similar threads
