I like it but I don't see school choice vouchers, making the tax cuts permanent, or entitlement reforms. However it is a great start.
FirstThat Iron Dome defense system needs to include defense from illegals.
School choice should be a states issue fwiw.I like it but I don't see school choice vouchers, making the tax cuts permanent, or entitlement reforms. However it is a great start.
Agreed. IMO the GOP should make it part of their platform that all candidates embrace and stress in all the down ticket races. That being said, there are encouragining school choice movements and initiatives either already signed into Law or about to be implemented in several Red States. So it's an issue Republicans are running on and winning with. We just need to make it a standard GOP boilerplate issue, like voter integrity.School choice should be a states issue fwiw.
1. You do realize that public schools are a state controlled entity?School "choice" vouchers are not mandates. The money goes directly to parents so they can decide how/where they want their children educated. The same money is being spent, but instead of it going to incompetent teacher unions and school boards, the parents get to decide where their education tax money will be spent. ALL schools will compete equally for those dollars...government schools, private schools, Montessori schools, home schools, Religious schools, technical schools and any other educational organization that has a better plan for any parents seeking quality educational options for their children.
Mandating school vouchers is literally the government staying out of schools. How dumb are you?“The federal government should stay out of our schools”
But….
“The federal government should mandate school vouchers”.
The hypocrisy is amazing.
Exactly! Vouchers are not even mandates...they are options parents can utilize to find better education alternatives for their kids if they aren't satisficed with their kid's school public or private! If the school is performing, nothing changes except maybe their ability to make changes. If it's a lousy school, it probably shouldn't be open in the first place, and probably won't be open much longer when the money dries up as parents pull their kids out.Mandating school vouchers is literally the government staying out of schools. How dumb are you?
If you think that federal government "mandates" are less government, you are a fool. Education is left up to the STATE GOVERNMENTS. Maybe you can go back to 9th grade civics class with your buddy Allen and learn a bit?Mandating school vouchers is literally the government staying out of schools. How dumb are you?
And the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT should not have anything to do with requiring it. Do you see my point? Of course not.Exactly! Vouchers are not even mandates...they are options parents can utilize to find better education alternatives for their kids if they aren't satisficed with their kid's school public or private! If the school is performing, nothing changes except maybe their ability to make changes. If it's a lousy school, it probably shouldn't be open in the first place, and probably won't be open much longer when the money dries up as parents pull their kids out.
Cool, then let’s just remove all Fed funding as education should be left up to the individual states.And the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT should not have anything to do with requiring it. Do you see my point? Of course not.
Also, states that are now pushing for this are pushing for charter schools. And 40% of those close within the first 10 years because they are not any good.
This is the intent behind ESA's and block grants mentioned earlier ITT. Well stated!Cool, then let’s just remove all Fed funding as education should be left up to the individual states.
The reality is, public schools are failing the youth. Not being for vouchers is THE single most racist policy we have. You’re effectively condemning kids without means, which are in predominantly minority communities to failed systems.
I think reading could be your problem or plain stupidity but you shouldn't call people fools when you clearly don't know what you are talking about. A school voucher mandate isn't a requirement for people to do something. It is requiring a state to give people an option on how to spend their tax dollars. That isn't not a larger government. That is a freedom option for citizens. You can try to twist words to fit whatever ****tard point you are trying to make but it isn't a sensible argumentIf you think that federal government "mandates" are less government, you are a fool. Education is left up to the STATE GOVERNMENTS. Maybe you can go back to 9th grade civics class with your buddy Allen and learn a bit?
School vouchers is already a states rights issue. The feds can only say if you take federal dollars you have to allow vouchers. That isn't bigger government. That is mandating freedom.And the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT should not have anything to do with requiring it. Do you see my point? Of course not.
Also, states that are now pushing for this are pushing for charter schools. And 40% of those close within the first 10 years because they are not any good.
Isn't it amusing how Leftists demanding a "choice" when it comes to slaughtering their own offspring are adamantly opposed to a "choice" when it comes to educating them? (those lucky enough to avoid being slaughtered in the womb)I think reading could be your problem or plain stupidity but you shouldn't call people fools when you clearly don't know what you are talking about. A school voucher mandate isn't a requirement for people to do something. It is requiring a state to give people an option on how to spend their tax dollars. That isn't not a larger government. That is a freedom option for citizens. You can try to twist words to fit whatever ****tard point you are trying to make but it isn't a sensible argument
Perhaps you should look up "open enrollment". Some states have already done this. Students can choose any school they want in the current system. And all this WITHOUT forcing tax payer money to private schools.Isn't it amusing how Leftists demanding a "choice" when it comes to slaughtering their own offspring are adamantly opposed to a "choice" when it comes to educating them? (those lucky enough to avoid being slaughtered in the womb)
Don't expect Leftists to be consistent in any of their arguments. That'd be like expecting them to tell the Truth! 😏
They can choose any school except the one they may want to attend. The parents pay taxes and the vouchers refund that back to the parent so their kid can go to the school they want. It isn't spending some other taxpayers money.Perhaps you should look up "open enrollment". Some states have already done this. Students can choose any school they want in the current system. And all this WITHOUT forcing tax payer money to private schools.
What Leftists can't accept (because they can't control them) is parents are driving the move towards school choice vouchers. Fed up with their limited choices in poorly performing government only education, they are lapping up vouchers, ESA's, home schooling, and a variety of other educational choice options using THEIR OWN MONEY! As I mentioned earlier ITT, Leftists have lost this argument because the status quo of government running education without accountability from alternative competition funded by vouchers has ended and it's parents who are ending it!They can choose any school except the one they may want to attend. The parents pay taxes and the vouchers refund that back to the parent so their kid can go to the school they want. It isn't spending some other taxpayers money.
It’s obvious you work with the education system. And I get it, you’re job protecting. You’re worried about your wallet. There is zero logical or rational reason underserved communities should be forced to attend public schools without other options while they show continued declines.Perhaps you should look up "open enrollment". Some states have already done this. Students can choose any school they want in the current system. And all this WITHOUT forcing tax payer money to private schools.
First, you have no idea what I work for. So stop assuming. Second, it’s the fact that my education in public schools rewarded me by providing me with the opportunity to attain a masters degree. As well as my wife. And sent my daughter to college on full academic scholarship. Those pissing and moaning about how “poor” our public schools are don’t see the other side of it. The problem isn’t with the schools, it’s with genetics and bad parental guidance.It’s obvious you work with the education system. And I get it, you’re job protecting. You’re worried about your wallet. There is zero logical or rational reason underserved communities should be forced to attend public schools without other options while they show continued declines.
I can see an argument against charter schools, however, I see zero argument against established private schools.
I’ve debated this topic for years with family who worked in the school system. Ironically, they all sent us to private schools. In turn, my kids have also only attended private schools. They see it one way, money out of the public school systems means they get even worse. I get that. It’s the sunk cost fallacy.
The teacher’s unions are ultimately to blame for the rising tide of discontent by parents. They wanted more without the accountability element. That’s just not logical. The whole WV teacher’s strike was a perfect example. Instead of incentivizing STEM teachers, they wanted everyone to be considered equal, and that’s just not the case, in life. Performance and merit are the metrics of life and business, not tenure.
Leftists are beholden to the teachers union, not the children. They would rather see the high performing students pushed down to the lowest level in order to protect their public education gravy train. Those of us that can afford private schools will take full advantage. Those who suffer the most are low income, especially black kids in the inner cities who's parents have no other option than to send them to under performing public schools. These kids deserve better and would be so much better off under a voucher system. Remind me again who truly cares about low income folks?It’s obvious you work with the education system. And I get it, you’re job protecting. You’re worried about your wallet. There is zero logical or rational reason underserved communities should be forced to attend public schools without other options while they show continued declines.
I can see an argument against charter schools, however, I see zero argument against established private schools.
I’ve debated this topic for years with family who worked in the school system. Ironically, they all sent us to private schools. In turn, my kids have also only attended private schools. They see it one way, money out of the public school systems means they get even worse. I get that. It’s the sunk cost fallacy.
The teacher’s unions are ultimately to blame for the rising tide of discontent by parents. They wanted more without the accountability element. That’s just not logical. The whole WV teacher’s strike was a perfect example. Instead of incentivizing STEM teachers, they wanted everyone to be considered equal, and that’s just not the case, in life. Performance and merit are the metrics of life and business, not tenure.
Your last paragraph sums up where most of the opposition to school choice vouchers emanates. The argument isn't that school choice doesn't work (it does) or that parents don't love it (they do) or that it actually saves taxpayers money (that's true too) the argument is "public money shouldn't be funding private schools", regardless of the overall positive results.It’s obvious you work with the education system. And I get it, you’re job protecting. You’re worried about your wallet. There is zero logical or rational reason underserved communities should be forced to attend public schools without other options while they show continued declines.
I can see an argument against charter schools, however, I see zero argument against established private schools.
I’ve debated this topic for years with family who worked in the school system. Ironically, they all sent us to private schools. In turn, my kids have also only attended private schools. They see it one way, money out of the public school systems means they get even worse. I get that. It’s the sunk cost fallacy.
The teacher’s unions are ultimately to blame for the rising tide of discontent by parents. They wanted more without the accountability element. That’s just not logical. The whole WV teacher’s strike was a perfect example. Instead of incentivizing STEM teachers, they wanted everyone to be considered equal, and that’s just not the case, in life. Performance and merit are the metrics of life and business, not tenure.
It’s obvious you work with the education system. And I get it, you’re job protecting. You’re worried about your wallet. There is zero logical or rational reason underserved communities should be forced to attend public schools without other options while they show continued declines.
I can see an argument against charter schools, however, I see zero argument against established private schools.
I’ve debated this topic for years with family who worked in the school system. Ironically, they all sent us to private schools. In turn, my kids have also only attended private schools. They see it one way, money out of the public school systems means they get even worse. I get that. It’s the sunk cost fallacy.
The teacher’s unions are ultimately to blame for the rising tide of discontent by parents. They wanted more without the accountability element. That’s just not logical. The whole WV teacher’s strike was a perfect example. Instead of incentivizing STEM teachers, they wanted everyone to be considered equal, and that’s just not the case, in life. Performance and merit are the metrics of life and business, not tenure.
Not only what you've pointed out here, but how does the voucher program "force" money into private schools? Exactly as you said, parents simply pick the schools they believe are performing with results they desire for their kids. There's no "forcing" them to choose schools they believe are producing better results. If that happens to be a government school, more $$$$$$$ for that school! If another public or private school is producing satisfactory results, competition! Where's the "force" in school choice?They can choose any school except the one they may want to attend. The parents pay taxes and the vouchers refund that back to the parent so their kid can go to the school they want. It isn't spending some other taxpayers money.
First, there are plenty on non-denominational and non-religious affiliated private schools. Are those ok with you?First, you have no idea what I work for. So stop assuming. Second, it’s the fact that my education in public schools rewarded me by providing me with the opportunity to attain a masters degree. As well as my wife. And sent my daughter to college on full academic scholarship. Those pissing and moaning about how “poor” our public schools are don’t see the other side of it. The problem isn’t with the schools, it’s with genetics and bad parental guidance.
EDIT: For example, I'm for the right for women to choose, but I'm against abortion personally. So just because you support something doesn't me you actually agree with it. My disagreement with tax dollars to private schools is simply because the use of funding from tax payers, who some may not be Catholic or may be atheist, shouldn't have their money funding those institutions.