TY if accurate. I didn’t see that. You said school(s). Who are the other P5s that are guaranteeing to be open in the Fall. I assume you’re representing Mizzo’s proclamation that they will be open no matter what right? Saying you PLAN on being open is different than saying you WILL be open. So your point about Pitt will be proven wrong if the schools that open don’t play games. Then, my point will be proven right when if they play no games until the Big12 signs off. Which we know if Oklahoma and Texas don’t play no one in Big12 will play. No one school is playing without conference approval. No fans also sounds like a non starter from what I was told.
Now regarding your first sentence. You are swinging in the dark wailing away and arguing with yourself. I haven’t seen one thread that said Pitt, WVU, Texas, Notre Dame or any school can determine any outcome regarding this football season. The decision to play this yr is in the hands of the Federal Guidelines(to some degree), state officials and University Presidents. Period. ADs, coaches and fake handle opinions will be on the sidelines.
That you, somehow, think this is about Pitt(just another irrelevant player in this ordeal) or felt like some clown posted that makes me think you may very well have issues. Get some help son. It’s not to late for you.
I can give you the list of schools if I felt like wasting my time.
Missouri said they are opening their campus for fall classes
You keep bringing up Pitt. Like I said Pitt doesn't determine anything with WVU. They aren't in the same conference.
To act like Pitt is going to play it safe isn't important. Who cares what they are doing.
You are too stupid to see the point.
99% of ADs said today there will be football next year.
Once again you aren't understanding where some schools are at compared to others.