1) show me where it’s proven Cohen didn’t go to Prague
2) show me where it’s proven that Flynn didn’t give information to the SC on the Russia investigation
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...y-davis-undercuts-major-steele-dossier-claim/
1) show me where it’s proven Cohen didn’t go to Prague
2) show me where it’s proven that Flynn didn’t give information to the SC on the Russia investigation
I think they live on Saturn. I really do.
Like predicting the judge is going to throw out Flynn's guilty plea and tell Mueller to piss off? lol.I like how they like to run with the "Deepstate" meme, but fail to see their own tin foil hats.
No, like clinging on to the Russian nonsense in the face of absolutely overwhelming evidence to the contrary.Like predicting the judge is going to throw out Flynn's guilty plea and tell Mueller to piss off? lol.
It's obvious to anyone that paid attention that the Cohen to Prague thing in the dossier was bunk as soon as Cohen plead guilty to lying to Congress and that wasn't the lie. I doubt the pee pee tape is real too. I'm sure there is more. Doesn't make the whole investigation illegal or all of the dossier invalid.
No, like clinging on to the Russian nonsense in the face of absolutely overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Nonsense? lol.No, like clinging on to the Russian nonsense in the face of absolutely overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Nonsense? lol.
And out comes the hat.
Yes, so far, the Russian collusion claims have been utter nonsense.
Because in every investigation, ALL the evidence is disclosed to the public to see and judge and nothing is withheld from the public at all.........That's how the American courts are, right?
Keep clinging to this hope that there is going to be proof found that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election.
Meanwhile there is proof that Hillary and the DNC colluded with a foreign agent.
The hat? So far we have at least 3 Trump campaign officials that have admitted they sat down with Russians for dirt on Clinton. Dummies just refuse to see that as collusion....that's fine. Did Trump campaign coordinate with email releases? Know ahead of time?And out comes the hat.
Yes, so far, the Russian collusion claims have been utter nonsense.
lol. Lot of guilty pleas for a bunch of nonsense.LOL. Yes, nonsense.
Meanwhile there is proof that Hillary and the DNC colluded with a foreign agent.
The hat? So far we have at least 3 Trump campaign officials that have admitted they sat down with Russians for dirt on Clinton. Dummies just refuse to see that as collusion....that's fine. Did Trump campaign coordinate with email releases? Know ahead of time?
Honest question, what would you consider collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?
Wow, ok, you need to take a step back, and think this out. Exactly how would collusion from American's part look? Who would approach who initially? How would the Russians need the collusion help?
The Russians would approach Flynn/Carter. Say, hey Mr. suspicious looking American, we think we can help Trump win the election by saying bad things about Hillary.
Flynn and or Carter will say either "Don't involve me in this", "How dare you interfere in our election", "Ok", or "Ok how can I help?"
Only the last option, "Ok how can I help?", is collusion. The Russians didn't need any American's help. If they did get help, it would be an egghead hacker, not a Trump official. Collusion from the campaign is almost an impossibility from the getgo.
Even if Carter/Flynn ran it up the flagpole, "Hey Don the man, those crazy Russians said they're going to hack Hillary's emails"... it isn't collusion.
Did that foreign agent register under FARA?
Did that foreign agent represent Russia?
Did that foreign agent represent Turkey?
Did Hillary and the DNC promise to eliminate sanctions on Russia prior to taking office?
Did Hillary or the DNC receive $600k from a foreign agent or country?
Just curious.
Keep clinging to this hope that there is going to be proof found that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election.
lol. Lot of guilty pleas for a bunch of nonsense.
The hat? So far we have at least 3 Trump campaign officials that have admitted they sat down with Russians for dirt on Clinton. Dummies just refuse to see that as collusion....that's fine. Did Trump campaign coordinate with email releases? Know ahead of time?
Honest question, what would you consider collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?
That's not collusion. Taking a meeting because someone claims to have dirt on your opponent (Something CLINTON hired a company to do, a company that hire KNOWN foreign actors), is not collusion.
What I would consider collusion is a coordinated effort by Trump and Russian officials to actively alter voter totals.
Meanwhile we have PROOF that officials within the DOJ and FBI acted improperly regarding Trump, his campaign and investigations prior to, and after the election, yet somehow that's more tinfoil hat and "Deepstate" nonsense?
Taking a meeting because someone claims to have dirt on your opponent is not collusion.
Meanwhile we have PROOF that officials within the DOJ and FBI acted improperly regarding Trump, his campaign and investigations prior to, and after the election, yet somehow that's more tinfoil hat and "Deepstate" nonsense?
It is conspiracy and it is illegal. It is a violation of federal election law. You can look it up.
They are the "Law and Order Party"! Trump has a hand grabbing hard on all his stupid pussies on here overlooking the obvious to parrot the Fox channel, hell, they have lost Fox news already because you can only preach to the stupid for so long before reality crashes your pity party.
That's not collusion. Taking a meeting because someone claims to have dirt on your opponent (Something CLINTON hired a company to do, a company that hire KNOWN foreign actors), is not collusion.
What I would consider collusion is a coordinated effort by Trump and Russian officials to actively alter voter totals.
Meanwhile we have PROOF that officials within the DOJ and FBI acted improperly regarding Trump, his campaign and investigations prior to, and after the election, yet somehow that's more tinfoil hat and "Deepstate" nonsense?
Feels, not facts.
lol. I don't see how we ever move on from this. I guess all future Presidential candidates will now have a foreign enemy sponsor. What a country. Good luck to yous guys.What I would consider collusion is a coordinated effort by Trump and Russian officials to actively alter voter totals.
Do you, or anyone on here, know exactly what was discussed between the two? That's the purpose of an investigation, to find out. Was there a "deal" made? Maybe, maybe not. Be patient if you have nothing to hide. Right?
lol. I don't see how we ever move on from this. I guess all future Presidential candidates will now have a foreign enemy sponsor. What a country. Good luck to yous guys.
Are you talking about Trump and Russia, or Clinton and Lynch?
See how that works? The left is all gung ho about investigating these thin allegations when it comes to Trump, but want to turn a blind eye when it comes to their own? Come on... how about some intellectual honesty and either we stand up for civil liberties and properly investigate all, or we admit our bias and selectively pick what we go after.
Remember, this is the guy who doesn't understand cloture and how the Senate works.
I understand it completely. Your right wing buddy dave didn't understand trump could get the wall funding with a simple majority. You all displayed your stupidity for the world to see in that thread and apparently, still don't understand it.
LMAO!
This is the answer to the question you asked. A concerted effort to coordinate between Trump’s campaign and the Russian state to damage Hillary in the election. Short of that? It’s just bullshit and posturing.Did Trump campaign coordinate with email releases?
Are you positioning that the Wall funding could be done through Budget Reconciliation? Or that Dems wouldn’t filibuster? Or that cloture only requires a simple majority?I understand it completely. Your right wing buddy dave didn't understand trump could get the wall funding with a simple majority. You all displayed your stupidity for the world to see in that thread and apparently, still don't understand it.
LMAO!
I think he means smart folks know it was the moderate Republicans that meant he needed Democrat votes but who cares, just get some popcorn and watch Trump burn down his party and administration, ya dummies ain't gonna save him on here rehashing every stupid conspiracy theory ya can find on the interwebs. We know Trump supporters are zealots for their boy and just gonna yell fake news when reality hits them in the face so why argue?Are you positioning that the Wall funding could be done through Budget Reconciliation? Or that Dems wouldn’t filibuster? Or that cloture only requires a simple majority?
You’ve yet to explain your position, like, at all.
I don’t even know what YOU are trying to say in this post, let alone your stupid fvcking friend and his moronic ramblings and incoherent musings.lmfao, Trumps rubes are soooooo the "law and Order Party"
I think he means smart folks know it was the moderate Republicans that meant he needed Democrat votes but who cares, just get some popcorn and watch Trump burn down his party and administration, ya dummies ain't gonna save him on here rehashing every stupid conspiracy theory ya can find on the interwebs. We know Trump supporters are zealots for their boy and just gonna yell fake news when reality hits them in the face so why argue?
so the cat’s lawyer fumbles up an answer that Prague never happened while chuckling, and anonymous sources say the FBI says so too? That’s proof? I’m not exactly sold.
It is conspiracy and it is illegal. It is a violation of federal election law. You can look it up.
1) show me where it’s proven Cohen didn’t go to Prague
2) show me where it’s proven that Flynn didn’t give information to the SC on the Russia investigation