ADVERTISEMENT

Rudy

Nancy doesnt care. Now if 20 dems decide they want to get reelected and vote no that changes things

She doesn't have 218 votes as of today! Media won't tell you, I just did.
 
Nancy doesnt care. Now if 20 dems decide they want to get reelected and vote no that changes things

They don't have 218, they won't get 235, and no Republicans are with them. This thing is a wounded duck even if it's flying at all! o_O

https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...ocrats-dont-have-enough-votes-yet/2231498001/

excerpt:
Asked whether the 235-member Democratic caucus can get to the needed majority, Yarmuth expressed doubts in an interview with the Courier Journal.

"I don't think we do right now," he said. "And I think that is really what is guiding Nancy in remaining reluctant to bring impeachment proceedings because she knows, at least at this point she believes, there's no way we can get 218 votes."

If you want the reason why this is STILL not on the docket for this session, this is why.
 
They don't have 218, they won't get 235, and no Republicans are with them. This thing is a wounded duck even if it's flying at all! o_O

https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...ocrats-dont-have-enough-votes-yet/2231498001/

excerpt:
Asked whether the 235-member Democratic caucus can get to the needed majority, Yarmuth expressed doubts in an interview with the Courier Journal.

"I don't think we do right now," he said. "And I think that is really what is guiding Nancy in remaining reluctant to bring impeachment proceedings because she knows, at least at this point she believes, there's no way we can get 218 votes."


LMAO!
 
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Post me when Nancy schedules the impeachment before Christmas OK country? Don't post me now, 'cause it's not there. [eyeroll]

You should really hang your hat on whether or not something is on the calendar.

LMAO!

I still can’t believe you are for real, Radio. You are like some made up, ignorant persona.
 

This doesn't refute what I've posted. In fact it's juvenile. Show me something in direct rebuttal to what I've posted, or show me where on the current legislative Congressional calendar the impeachment vote is scheduled for the full House?

Well...time for country to go...run along country!
giphy.gif
 
You should really hang your hat on whether or not something is on the calendar.

LMAO!

I still can’t believe you are for real, Radio. You are like some made up, ignorant persona.

I notice you cannot refute what I've posted, so you resort to personal insults. Embarrassing isn't it?
 
I will make a bet, but the bet is the senate has to get 68 votes to remove him before February 1 or you agree to leave for 3 years.
Where did chickenshit go? I thought big boy liked to put his money where his mouth is?
 
You’re welcome to take the bet too, pussy.

You know your track record on here isn't very good and when you lower yourself to the name calling when everyone sees how regularly you are exposed on this forum you not only enhance your infantile demeanor, but you highlight the very reason you are nothing but a glittering caricature of ineptness for the board's amusement.

If you saw yourself the way we see you you'd stop watching, or stop making a complete joke of yourself.
 
You should really hang your hat on whether or not something is on the calendar.

See this is what I mean when I say how much of a fool you make of yourself posting hahahahahahahahahahaha or LMAO or calling folks F'n morons.o_O

So how does any legislative business gain consideration on the House floor if it isn't scheduled on the House docket? What do they do, just show up and decide that day what the order of business is?

That's probably what you think because you're such a damn fool.
giphy.gif
 
See this is what I mean when I say how much of a fool you make of yourself posting hahahahahahahahahahaha or LMAO or calling folks F'n morons.o_O

So how does any legislative business gain consideration on the House floor if it isn't scheduled on the House docket? What do they do, just show up and decide that day what the order of business is?

That's probably what you think because you're such a damn fool.
giphy.gif
Soneone told hin earlemier in the week to hang his hat on something and now he is repeating it. He really is a dumb one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Soneone told hin earlemier in the week to hang his hat on something and now he is repeating it. He really is a dumb one.

That calendar isn't hard to read. Congress has only so many days to consider its business. That's why they have a docket. Impeachment ain't on it! But since when did Democrats care about due process?
 
You had better hope its LMAO because if you have to disappear for a year I am starting a memorial thread to mock your stupid ass 365 straight days.

Dave use simple logic here. Don't you think if Democrats had a solid case to convict Trump he'd already be impeached? Don't you think if they had more than 218 votes, a vote to impeach him would be immediately forthcoming?

As much as they hate this guy and want to get rid of him?

So why haven't they voted yet? Why is it (vote) not even scheduled? What's the holdup? Why more hearings? What don't they know? What do they need to make their case?

Time. They need more time for Nancy and the media propagandists to twist more arms and try to convince more Democrat members to sign up to impeach Trump. They can't hold a vote now, or even announce how many are ready to vote to impeach because they haven't convinced enough members yet to pass that vote because they don't have a strong enough case.

This isn't rocket science, it's politics.
 
Dave use simple logic here. Don't you think if Democrats had a solid case to convict Trump he'd already be impeached? Don't you think if they had more than 218 votes, a vote to impeach him would be immediately forthcoming?

As much as they hate this guy and want to get rid of him?

So why haven't they voted yet? Why is it (vote) not even scheduled? What's the holdup? Why more hearings? What don't they know? What do they need to make their case?

Time. They need time for Nancy and the media propagandists to twist more arms and try to convince more Democrat members to sign up to impeach Trump. They can't hold a vote now, or even announce how many are ready to vote to impeach because they haven't convinced enough members yet to pass that vote because they don't have a strong enough case.

This isn't rocket science, it's politics.
Its true they have a lot of work to do on the changing minds front but they are going to impeach unless a bunch of freshman defect.
 
Hahahahahaha.

“trump asserted executive privilege for his employees.” LMAO! That’s a doozy. That’s probably the dumbest thing I’ve heard this entire year. There is no such thing as executive privilege for federal employees who are not his counsel. OMG. That was f’ucking amazing. You can bet your ass I’ll use this one for a very long time. Yes, directing federal employees to ignore subpoenas is obstruction of justice.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Actually, what it sounds like, to rational people of course, is a disagreement between the executive and the legislative. And in such a disagreement, the third branch of government decides the determination. It needs to be decided in the courts. They will decide if he’s allowed to assert privilege.
 
Its true they have a lot of work to do on the changing minds front but they are going to impeach unless a bunch of freshman defect.

I'm saying it's those defections who Dems don't have with them yet. Trust me, if the votes were there, Nancy would have scheduled it for the floor already. She doesn't have the votes, and to announce that now (not enough votes) kills the whole arm twisting effort going on as we speak.

It's a race against time, because they only have a couple of weeks to get this done. However as the article I linked to earlier in the thread points out, they are having trouble with members from swing districts who are hearing from constituents to back off or else.
 
Last edited:
No, see my post above, I said it wasn’t illegal. What does it have to do with the impeachment inquiry? Impeaching Trump is their only chance at beating him and getting control back lest they wait another 5 years. Why was Trump focused on Biden and the Ukraine? Probably because Biden is running for President and has a video of him bragging about an actual quid pro quo.

Who gives a flying fvk if it is illegal or not dog. You as a former military guy can’t possibly believe what trump did was the right thing to do or even consider. His staff hid the tape of the call. They new what he said was wrong, trump has his personality attorney in Ukraine trying to find dirt today for Christ sakes. Wtf is wrong wit( you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
His staff hid the tape of the call.
Hahahahha that’s one way to spin it.

Another is that they’re compartmentalizing investigations to ensure secrecy and integrity of them. /insert coop’s grand jury argument during the bunker nonsense. Turns out it was for good reason. Col Vindman was found to be trying to access the transcript in order to make changes to it.

You know, the one Trump released so we could all read it?

As a military man, I’m disgusted with Congress’s behavior. Pelosi’s Waterloo.
 
Who gives a flying fvk if it is illegal or not dog.
And follow the thread ya silly old. That discussion was about money flowing from Congressional allocations (US taxpayer money) into NGOs, Foreign Govts, and NPOs and then those same entities turn around and shave 20-30% back to lobbying firms and direct to SuperPacs/
election/re-election direct campaign contributions.
 
Who gives a flying fvk if it is illegal or not dog. You as a former military guy can’t possibly believe what trump did was the right thing to do or even consider. His staff hid the tape of the call. They new what he said was wrong, trump has his personality attorney in Ukraine trying to find dirt today for Christ sakes. Wtf is wrong wit( you.

But you'd be cool with Trump threatening the Ukrainian government if it possibly benefited his son?

For Christ sakes.... Wtf is wrong with YOU?
 
Hahahahha that’s one way to spin it.

Another is that they’re compartmentalizing investigations to ensure secrecy and integrity of them. /insert coop’s grand jury argument during the bunker nonsense. Turns out it was for good reason. Col Vindman was found to be trying to access the transcript in order to make changes to it.

You know, the one Trump released so we could all read it?

As a military man, I’m disgusted with Congress’s behavior. Pelosi’s Waterloo.

Col Vindman recommended changes. He never tried to access records to change them. It is pretty disgusting that you would lie about a fellow service man.

You’re a phony.
 
Hahahahha that’s one way to spin it.

Another is that they’re compartmentalizing investigations to ensure secrecy and integrity of them. /insert coop’s grand jury argument during the bunker nonsense. Turns out it was for good reason. Col Vindman was found to be trying to access the transcript in order to make changes to it.

You know, the one Trump released so we could all read it?

As a military man, I’m disgusted with Congress’s behavior. Pelosi’s Waterloo.

What ever you want to believe is Dandan as you have your lips buried in trump’s backside. If you belief for a moment this was about Biden corruption you clearly have little common sense and have bought in completely to the deep state BS
 
  • Like
Reactions: bamaEER
What ever you want to believe is Dandan as you have your lips buried in trump’s backside. If you belief for a moment this was about Biden corruption you clearly have little common sense and have bought in completely to the deep state BS

I'm so sorry for what you're going through Monday
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT