Then investigate, with the DOJ that you are the head of. Don't ask a foreign country...and withhold their aid...and ask them to announce they are investigating the Bidens.
DOH!
Rudy
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Then investigate, with the DOJ that you are the head of. Don't ask a foreign country...and withhold their aid...and ask them to announce they are investigating the Bidens.
DOH!
Not just any kickbacks. Theae are US tax dollars laundered through foreign governments coming back to the politicians.
Yes....I clearly see the difference......The Ukranians did exactly what Joe demanded.......not so in Trumps case.
The transcript and Ukraine’s President literally confirms that.
Admit what? That he asked the Ukrainian President to assist AG Barr and at no point was it ever communicated to the President that funding was contingent on assisting? The reality literally blows up the Dems whole narrative.
fake news. Hope your second set of books is more convincible than your political arguments.
Most eloquent and precise rationale discussed in the hearings. When you have a constitutional scholar like Turley, admittedly in opposition to Trump saying this is wrong, the Dems have a major problem. This is Nancy’s Waterloo.
LMAO! How is he in "opposition to trump?" He was for impeachment of Clinton.
Anyone with any common sense can see this guy is a tool. Lying to Congress is impeachable (which I agree with) but obstruction of Congress, having a private citizen investigated by a foreign country, withholding aid to said foreign country, asking said foreign country to investigate a political rival isn't impeachable. That's f'ucking hilarious.
He said he voted for Obama and Clinton, seems like he’s not politically biased, unlike the other two.
Using the courts isn’t obstruction of Congress you dolt. That’s the absolute most absurd bullshit in a long line of examples you’ve ever uttered. It’s literally a bedrock foundational principle of this nation.
Aid wasn’t withheld. It was paid within the FY as per the requirement. He’s even allowed to delay it past the FY providing he notifies congress and provides rationale (doesn’t need their approval, just his rationale) Further, it was only delayed and the President has the authority to do it, reference Biden, who was the VP and did it. Do you not see how ignorant you sound when there is a video clip of Biden bragging about it?
He asked Ukraine to assist Barr, that’s literally the treaty we have in place.
And running for President doesn’t make you immune from investigation. Clearly. Re: Crossfire Hurricane.
I guess you morons think you’ll be able to control the narrative in the Senate. They’re going to eat you guys alive. He who speaks last has the longest laugh. I cannot wait. Nancy’s Waterloo
Florida is much closer than Hawaii where the Bama familia vacationed..........PSHEW
LOL! He said he voted... Yeah, he said.
He (trump) directed federal employees to ignore subpoenas. That is not using the courts, dumbass. That is clearly obstruction of justice.
He did delay aid. The funds were certified and clearance of Ukraine was given on May 23. You just admitted in your reply he delayed the aid. They are in the middle of a war with Russia and you are ok with delaying Congressionally-authorized aid for 4 months.
You are literally on the side of f’ucking Russia. Trumpers are f’icling idiots. You’ve swallowed so much bullshit, you are now mooing, and don’t know the truth from the bullshit donald feeds you. I’m f’ucking embarrassed for you.
Good post. However you are talking to folks who're willing and ready to commit suicide, trying to convince them it's better to live.
I say let 'em off themselves!
country refuses to face the reality of the Congressional calendar as proof this impeachment doesn't happen before Christmas. Put a lock on that, it's NOT happening by then!
Here's a link to the legislative calendar
https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity
Now as for the remaining days in the current session after Christmas, it gets interesting. There is roughly a two week window in early January they have to pass these articles onto the Senate. Depending on how quickly the Senate takes them up, we could be facing the Democrat Iowa caucuses in early February while Biden is sitting on the witness stand!
How anxious will Republicans be to get him back to the campaign trail unscathed?
(Now do you see why if this wasn't wrapped up by Christmas it's over?)
And the delay is attributed to, per the OMB official who testified in the bunker, Trump wanting a review on why other NATO countries weren’t also pitching in. You know, 100% consistent with his approach towards NATO since being elected.
Is he allowed to delay the funds? Yes or no?
Why didn’t Obama provide funding for military aid while President, like when say, Russia invaded Crimea? He had 2 years. Did nothing. Seems your continued persistence to ignore this fact logically tells me you’re on the side of Russia. The reality is Trump has done more on orders of magnitude to combat Russia, globally. Oh wait, I forgot. Obama told them to quit it. Hahahahaha
Trump asserted executive privilege for his people. It’s up to Congress to use the 3rd branch of Govt, the courts, to settle the dispute. No matter how much you want, it’s not obstruction unless he ignores the courts, assuming they don’t side with him.
You're all kids of wrong here. You’re actually not right about anything.
Hahahahahaha.
“trump asserted executive privilege for his employees.” LMAO! That’s a doozy. That’s probably the dumbest thing I’ve heard this entire year. There is no such thing as executive privilege for federal employees who are not his counsel. OMG. That was f’ucking amazing. You can bet your ass I’ll use this one for a very long time. Yes, directing federal employees to ignore subpoenas is obstruction of justice.
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You're so smart...you have it all figured out right? Yet you are totally unaware that as of now Nancy doesn't even have 200 solid Democrat votes ready to impeach Trump. That's right, she's been told to direct Judiciary to draft stronger convicting articles to impeach that will gather Republican House support and not be unanimously rejected in the Senate by Republicans or else a solid group of roughly 40 House Democrats (many from Trump districts) will leave her high and dry!
post "bump 163" to that.
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Wrong. Two members of OMB testified all clearances were made by May 23. The funds could have and should have been released on May 23. They also testified there were many people throughout OMB asking around why the funds were not released and could get no answers. They even communicated with the Pentagon and the Pentagon was unaware of any reasons for delaying the release of the funds. They were only released on Sep 11, after the whistleblower complaint. You really should have paid attention and watched the hearings. I do understand you would not have liked what you saw.
Poor little tard doesnt know what he is taling about again but that wont stop him from posting.
Dave are you now convinced that since we won't get an impeachment vote by Christmas, this whole thing blows up after that? Or do you still think they will squeeze an impeachment vote out shortly after the first of the year?
Daily, support for impeachment drops....latest poll shows it now under 40%. the longer Nancy drags this on without scheduling a vote, the more support she loses in her caucus, especially among those members who won Trump districts in '16
https://politicodailynews.com/poll-...or-impeachment-drops-as-democrats-plow-ahead/
excerpt:
A Morning Consult survey of roughly 2,000 registered voters, conducted between Nov. 1 and Nov. 3, showed that just 47 percent of respondents support Trump’s impeachment.
By contrast, a Morning Consult poll conducted between Oct. 11 and Oct. 13 showed that a majority of respondents — 51 percent — were in favor of impeachment.
Thus, public support for impeachment appears to have dropped 4 percentage points in under a month.
https://www.redstate.com/sister-tol...may-setting-democrats-2020-election-disaster/
excerpt
Unfortunately for Democrats, several days of impeachment inquiry hearings have not helped them with independents. The latest Morning Consult poll, released Tuesday, shows a dramatic drop in their support for impeaching Trump as well as a dramatic drop in their support for the inquiry
...more
this is a nightmare scenario for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Intel Chair Adam Schiff, who in spite of saying they’d be willing to lose the House over this issue have very deep concerns about how this will play out among vulnerable House Democrats in the months to come.
This news has to be especially concerning for House Democratic leaders considering how independents can often swing elections in competitive races that are super-close.
https://politicodailynews.com/poll-...or-impeachment-drops-as-democrats-plow-ahead/
excerpt:
A Morning Consult survey of roughly 2,000 registered voters, conducted between Nov. 1 and Nov. 3, showed that just 47 percent of respondents support Trump’s impeachment.
By contrast, a Morning Consult poll conducted between Oct. 11 and Oct. 13 showed that a majority of respondents — 51 percent — were in favor of impeachment.
Thus, public support for impeachment appears to have dropped 4 percentage points in under a month.
https://www.redstate.com/sister-tol...may-setting-democrats-2020-election-disaster/
excerpt
Unfortunately for Democrats, several days of impeachment inquiry hearings have not helped them with independents. The latest Morning Consult poll, released Tuesday, shows a dramatic drop in their support for impeaching Trump as well as a dramatic drop in their support for the inquiry
...more
this is a nightmare scenario for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Intel Chair Adam Schiff, who in spite of saying they’d be willing to lose the House over this issue have very deep concerns about how this will play out among vulnerable House Democrats in the months to come.
This news has to be especially concerning for House Democratic leaders considering how independents can often swing elections in competitive races that are super-close.
Last edited:
Nancy doesnt care. Now if 20 dems decide they want to get reelected and vote no that changes things
