Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2 days and the MSM still hasn’t figured how to properly spin this one yet. Hahahahha 1-2-3 go away bad dream. 1-2-3 go away bad dream.IF IT'S NOT ON CNN, IT'S NOT NEWS !
The first shot at Dem talking points are now out. If you had "Why are GOPs in congress doing Russias bidding and trying to take away the investigation into their collusion to affect our elections" you are the winner.2 days and the MSM still hasn’t figured how to properly spin this one yet. Hahahahha 1-2-3 go away bad dream. 1-2-3 go away bad dream.
The first shot at Dem talking points are now out. If you had "Why are GOPs in congress doing Russias bidding and trying to take away the investigation into their collusion to affect our elections" you are the winner.
Maybe you should be asking Senator Grassley why this is suddenly so important more than 3 years after the fact when the GOP has had control of the Senate since 2014. Oh, that's right, they were still too busy investigating Benghazi to worry about the Russians, and didn't have a Republican president and his family and cronies to provide cover for.Grassley dispatched letters last week to all the federal agencies whose executives served on the CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment) when the decision (Uranium sale) was made, demanding to know whether they were aware of the FBI case (Investigation of bribery) before they voted.
He also questioned whether the documented corruption that was uncovered posed a national security threat that should have voided approval of the uranium deal
Silence from the Left.
Maybe you should be asking Senator Grassley why this is suddenly so important more than 3 years after the fact when the GOP has had control of the Senate since 2014. Oh, that's right, they were still too busy investigating Benghazi to worry about the Russians, and didn't have a Republican president and his family and cronies to provide cover for.
Maybe you should be asking Senator Grassley why this is suddenly so important more than 3 years after the fact when the GOP has had control of the Senate since 2014. Oh, that's right, they were still too busy investigating Benghazi to worry about the Russians, and didn't have a Republican president and his family and cronies to provide cover for.
Except Grassley is acting on an investigative article released by The Hill.Maybe you should be asking Senator Grassley why this is suddenly so important more than 3 years after the fact when the GOP has had control of the Senate since 2014. Oh, that's right, they were still too busy investigating Benghazi to worry about the Russians, and didn't have a Republican president and his family and cronies to provide cover for.
Was the article not based off information in the public for a while? I have no problems delving deeper in to the Obama DOJ and anything Clinton Foundation, but I think some people are wildly over playing their hands. My fave is using this to discredit Mueller.Except Grassley is acting on an investigative article released by The Hill.
Was the article not based off information in the public for a while? I have no problems delving deeper in to the Obama DOJ and anything Clinton Foundation, but I think some people are wildly over playing their hands. My fave is using this to discredit Mueller.
The whole thing could be cleared up if we could read what was on those classified State Department e mails that somehow mysteriously disappeared.
Right. This is cover for Trump. Spread those talkig points.Maybe you should be asking Senator Grassley why this is suddenly so important more than 3 years after the fact when the GOP has had control of the Senate since 2014. Oh, that's right, they were still too busy investigating Benghazi to worry about the Russians, and didn't have a Republican president and his family and cronies to provide cover for.
You mean this was public knowledge before? Or I guess it was ignored since it was the failing NYT. Nevermind.
You mean this was public knowledge before? Or I guess it was ignored since it was the failing NYT. Nevermind.
Ok?As that article states, it was baseless [prior to this week] to accuse TCF of pay for play. But the circumstantial evidence was there.
Not completely.Was the article not based off information in the public for a while? I have no problems delving deeper in to the Obama DOJ and anything Clinton Foundation, but I think some people are wildly over playing their hands. My fave is using this to discredit Mueller.
Didnt realize "The Hill" was the failing NYT.You mean this was public knowledge before? Or I guess it was ignored since it was the failing NYT. Nevermind.
I don't mean this to be a dick....but are you able to follow along in these threads? I was replying to THE posting a NYT article from 2015.Didnt realize "The Hill" was the failing NYT.
I don't mean this to be a dick....but are you able to follow along in these threads? I was replying to THE posting a NYT article from 2015.
Sorry. Was not following the thread. Just checking in between meetings.I don't mean this to be a dick....but are you able to follow along in these threads? I was replying to THE posting a NYT article from 2015.
I believed it yesterday. I didn't believe THE's and Jack Posobeck's spin on what happened.I thought perhaps giving you a liberal failing newspaper you might believe it.