ADVERTISEMENT

Obama should go to Jail

MichiganHerd

All-American
Aug 17, 2011
18,223
6,666
628
Forget the crimes he committed on the Trump campaign. He deserves to go to jail for all the damage he did to this great country of ours.

Obama was as useless to America as chop sticks were to Stephen Hawking.
 
There's a whole group here that needs to get into therapy. The first step is admitting they have a problem and there have been many admissions.
An Obama DustBowl Survivors Group. To help all the poor souls that suffered through years of GDP growth, jobs growth and stock market growth. May god have mercy on their souls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boomboom521 and moe
Forget the crimes he committed on the Trump campaign. He deserves to go to jail for all the damage he did to this great country of ours.

Obama was as useless to America as chop sticks were to Stephen Hawking.
Hawking died, and even if he hadn’t, you should have some respect for a great mind
 
DdhOGYwU0AA22j8.jpg
 
There's a whole group here that needs to get into therapy. The first step is admitting they have a problem and there have been many admissions.

So you admit moe you need treatment for your TDS?
 
Shirley you can respect others

I'm admiring your restraint...you've come a long way. However you should be joining in the calls on here for jail time for some of these folks. I know you aren't defending them, but why not at least admit there are serious violations of Law ongoing here and heads need to roll?

But good job on refraining from some of the personal attacks. Puts you a cut above.:eek:kay:
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVU82
Forget the crimes he committed on the Trump campaign. He deserves to go to jail for all the damage he did to this great country of ours.

Obama was as useless to America as chop sticks were to Stephen Hawking.

His agenda in my opinion, was not to build this country up, but rather to tear it down. Any objective analysis of the end results of his policies make this unmistakably clear. In fact, it's not really even arguable! Nothing he pursued as a policy ended up leaving the country overall in better shape than it had been before his policy was implemented. Not one thing...Domestically or overseas. It's embarrassing how ineffective he was!

Time for someone on the Left to disprove my thesis. Name the Obama administration policy that left the country in a better position after it was implemented than before?

I'll hang up and listen...

(but make sure you bring solid facts and data, or else I'm going to blow you apart)


 
A primer...(and there's more where this came from)

At home and Abroad, Obama's trail of disasters

excerpt:
"In 2010, two years after electing him president, voters trounced Obama’s party, handing Democrats the biggest midterm losses in 72 years. Obama was reelected in 2012, but by nearly 4 million fewer votes than in his first election, making him the only president ever to win a second term with shrunken margins in both the popular and electoral vote. Two years later, with Obama imploring voters, “[My] policies are on the ballot — every single one of them,” Democrats were clobbered again. And in 2016, as he campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton, Obama was increasingly adamant that his legacy was at stake. “I’m not on this ballot,” he told campaign rallies in a frequent refrain, “but everything we’ve done these last eight years is on the ballot.” The voters heard him out, and once more turned him down."

Full article:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion...l-disasters/YOaU1KuAT3hSHaGHkmGCeN/story.html
 
How can he be considered fraudulent? I thought he told us who and what he was. Black(partially) man who had been a community organizer and Chairman of Harvard Law Review. Liberals wanted the black man, and they voted for him - come hell or high water. He was anti-gun, anti coal. He was for socialism and pristine atmosphere. And liberals and a few conservatives and independents still voted for him.

I see no intent to deceive. Place of birth is only open question and that was not pressed too vigorously. It would be impossible to find him guilty of wrong-doing. You have got to do something to be exposed to wrong-doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb and 30CAT
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013 - Forbes
https://www.forbes.com/.../president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations-of-2013...
Dec 23, 2013 - One of Barack Obama's chief accomplishments has been to return the ... Pfeiffer explaining that “when Congress won't act, this president will.

Obama vetoes 9/11 bill | TheHill
thehill.com/homenews/administration/296862-obama-vetoes-9-11-bill
Sep 23, 2016 - President Obama on Friday vetoed legislation that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia in U.S courts, setting up a ...

Uranium One Deal: Obama Administration Complicit, Not Just ...
https://www.nationalreview.com/.../uranium-one-deal-obama-administration-doj-hillar...
Oct 21, 2017 - Obama's Department of Justice cut a quiet and too-lenient plea deal with a Russian racketeer in a case that would've proved embarrassing to ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
How can he be considered fraudulent? I thought he told us who and what he was. Black(partially) man who had been a community organizer and Chairman of Harvard Law Review. Liberals wanted the black man, and they voted for him - come hell or high water. He was anti-gun, anti coal. He was for socialism and pristine atmosphere. And liberals and a few conservatives and independents still voted for him.

I see no intent to deceive. Place of birth is only open question and that was not pressed too vigorously. It would be impossible to find him guilty of wrong-doing. You have got to do something to be exposed to wrong-doing.

He was never specific on exactly what he meant by "transforming" America. I suspect had he been honest, he would not have been given the chance voters gave him to screw it up.

Telling to me for as many Leftists on this forum who defend him, not one of them have stepped up to my challenge in post #26. I can't really blame them, he didn't leave anything better and the voters who actually saw what he left f*cked up know it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mneilmont
every time he was on camera he lied...

every time...


One of, if not the worst president(s) (sorry Jimmy Carter) in history. One of, if not the biggest liar to have ever held office.

His administration was about as transparent as a lead window. A socialistic, marxist who was a disgrace to American values.

God bless Trump! Finally a President who values our Constitution and puts America first!

MAGA!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
I posted in another thread yesterday and someone responded that I hadn't posted in awhile and I said it's partly because the over the top political stuff on this board gets old. This thread is an example of it. It is May 2018 and a thread about how Obama should be sent to jail that was initially posted about 30 hours ago is still going strong and has about 30-some posts in it. It is hard to think of a bigger waste of time (to me) than stuff like this. When a significant percentage of the threads on the board are on stuff like this the board simply isn't very appealing to me.
 
I posted in another thread yesterday and someone responded that I hadn't posted in awhile and I said it's partly because the over the top political stuff on this board gets old. This thread is an example of it. It is May 2018 and a thread about how Obama should be sent to jail that was initially posted about 30 hours ago is still going strong and has about 30-some posts in it. It is hard to think of a bigger waste of time (to me) than stuff like this. When a significant percentage of the threads on the board are on stuff like this the board simply isn't very appealing to me.

Truth hurts. It's an open forum and you have every chance as well as a right to rebut or challenge anything else posted you believe is inaccurate or unfair.

That's actuallly how open discussion on a forum such as this is designed to work. I'm not for the personal attacks, but characterizations of idiotic posts or policy are fair game. Leftists complain when they face open opposition or challenges to their positions, but they reserve the right to disparage any and all who simply disagree with them or point out their facutal deceit & dishonesty.
 
He was never specific on exactly what he meant by "transforming" America. I suspect had he been honest, he would not have been given the chance voters gave him to screw it up.

Telling to me for as many Leftists on this forum who defend him, not one of them have stepped up to my challenge in post #26. I can't really blame them, he didn't leave anything better and the voters who actually saw what he left f*cked up know it.
No problem with what you say. Did he commit fraud to get into office, I would say no. The violations he committed while in office, let me count the ways. He got away with so much crap only because Congress never did their job. Total running of the country was assumed by President, Senate President, and Speaker of the House. That in and of itself is criminal. The taxpayers pay 435, +2, + 9 positions to do their jobs independently and they defer to the 3 people mentioned above. Of course Hillary was left to run wild too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT