ADVERTISEMENT

New Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick details parties where girls were drugged and raped

So what would it take for me to state that a particular 4chan rumor isn't fact, but it sure sounds fun, in order for you to understand that I haven't taken it as fact? Other than you're just an idiot?
Not post this:

It was a brilliant play by someone. If CreepyPornLawyer doesn't produce, which he won't, that guy will live in internet history forever. The truth of the troll doesn't matter.
Don't be ashamed. Other nuts fell for it too.
 
So, they were there? At the same party? *gasp*

Just so we are all clear...the party of family values is A-OK with their SC pick to have thrown and attended parties where women were being drugged and raped so as long as they actually didn’t do the raping. That’s the red line for them. Not that he tried to step in and put an end to it or that he called the authorities. Just the hope that he he didn’t actively participate in the raping.

Gotcha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moe
Not post this:


Don't be ashamed. Other nuts fell for it too.

"The truth of the troll don't matter"

giphy.gif
 
Just so we are all clear...the party of family values is A-OK with their SC pick to have thrown and attended parties where women were being drugged and raped so as long as they actually didn’t do the raping. That’s the red line for them. Not that he tried to step in and put an end to it or that he called the authorities. Just the hope that he he didn’t actively participate in the raping.

Gotcha.
They stand tall behind Trump, Kavs isn't anywhere near that bad. Literally the only thing most of them care about is Roe v Wade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CpEER
The Avenatti troll. "If CreepyPornLawyer doesn't produce, which he won't"
oksuredotgif

They use that creepy porn lawyer tag without a hint of self awareness. Like...how did he end up being a lawyer for a porn star my mans.
 
Just so we are all clear...the party of family values is A-OK with their SC pick to have thrown and attended parties where women were being drugged and raped so as long as they actually didn’t do the raping. That’s the red line for them. Not that he tried to step in and put an end to it or that he called the authorities. Just the hope that he he didn’t actively participate in the raping.

Gotcha.
Didn't this recent accuser do the same...she knew it was going on (if you believe it) and she said nothing...and she attended the parties. I missed the part where she stepped or called the authorities...wonder why she didn't?
 
Didn't this recent accuser do the same...she knew it was going on (if you believe it) and she said nothing...and she attended the parties. I missed the part where she stepped or called the authorities...wonder why she didn't?
See if you can ask her during a hearing.
 
Just so we are all clear...the party of family values is A-OK with their SC pick to have thrown and attended parties where women were being drugged and raped so as long as they actually didn’t do the raping. That’s the red line for them. Not that he tried to step in and put an end to it or that he called the authorities. Just the hope that he he didn’t actively participate in the raping.

Gotcha.

No, I don't believe a word of any of it.

  1. Democrats stated #resist in July
  2. Hearing goes on as planned, nothing earthshaking is announced
  3. Feinstein rolls out alleged victim #1, had letter since July, did nothing
  4. Alleged victim #2's story falls apart on launch
  5. Alleged victim #1's story falls apart, no witnesses
  6. Alleged victim #1 doesn't turn in any legal documents by deadline on Tuesday, and probably won't show tomorrow
  7. Hey wait! #CreepyPornLawyer pulls a rabbit out of his hat that the woman doesn't accuse him of anything, but keeps going to parties where people are being raped, in her words.
Any of it.
 
Didn't this recent accuser do the same...she knew it was going on (if you believe it) and she said nothing...and she attended the parties. I missed the part where she stepped or called the authorities...wonder why she didn't?

This stupid analogy begins with “they are the victims here” and ends with “they are not the ones being nominated for the SC”

Next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
Well this is certainly a game changer, assuming it’s factual. I mean, there are a lot of holes where this could be blown apart and doesn’t stick to him, but at this point, I’d say he’s likely done.
 
This stupid analogy begins with “they are the victims here” and ends with “they are not the ones being nominated for the SC”

Next.
Maybe you can point me to the part in her avadavat where she says he raped her...that would be a start. Other than its all bullsh!t
 
No, I don't believe a word of any of it.

  1. Democrats stated #resist in July
  2. Hearing goes on as planned, nothing earthshaking is announced
  3. Feinstein rolls out alleged victim #1, had letter since July, did nothing
  4. Alleged victim #2's story falls apart on launch
  5. Alleged victim #1's story falls apart, no witnesses
  6. Alleged victim #1 doesn't turn in any legal documents by deadline on Tuesday, and probably won't show tomorrow
  7. Hey wait! #CreepyPornLawyer pulls a rabbit out of his hat that the woman doesn't accuse him of anything, but keeps going to parties where people are being raped, in her words.
Any of it.

Yet you still fall hard for every stupid Nunes memo, Gym Jordan tale (tail?), Pizzagate conspiracy and QAnon and 4Chan troll job.


One might be inclined to think that your critical thinking skills are suspect.
 
They stand tall behind Trump, Kavs isn't anywhere near that bad. Literally the only thing most of them care about is Roe v Wade.

I don't give two shits about Roe v Wade, I just want a constitutionalist on the court. Period. Kav goes away... next person on Trump's list gets put forth. Probs the Catholic broad, which WILL piss off the left and and make the right cream their pants over Roe v. Wade.
 
Well this is certainly a game changer, assuming it’s factual. I mean, there are a lot of holes where this could be blown apart and doesn’t stick to him, but at this point, I’d say he’s likely done.

What hurts this story is who released it. Doucher wasn't the best "lawyer" for the left to use to slow roll this story, which is designed to force the FBI "investigation" hand.
 
I don't give two shits about Roe v Wade, I just want a constitutionalist on the court. Period. Kav goes away... next person on Trump's list gets put forth. Probs the Catholic broad, which WILL piss off the left and and make the right cream their pants over Roe v. Wade.
I didn't say all. I said most. How is the left being pissed and the right creaming their pants about Roe v Wade any different than now? #MeToo would probs be a smidge harder. This was fumbled from the start.
 
No you read it carefully. First sentence of item 13.

She was raped at a party where they were also in attendance? Did they know she was being raped? Did they join in? I was at a party where a girl was raped. Had no idea it occurred until about a week later. Didn’t even know the dude who did it, had never met him in my life.
 
Yet you still fall hard for every stupid Nunes memo, Gym Jordan tale (tail?), Pizzagate conspiracy and QAnon and 4Chan troll job.


One might be inclined to think that your critical thinking skills are suspect.

Nunes is accurate, no idea what you're talking about, ummm, no, ummm, no, and ummmm, no.
 
I didn't say all. I said most. How is the left being pissed and the right creaming their pants about Roe v Wade any different than now? #MeToo would probs be a smidge harder. This was fumbled from the start.

MeToo would struggle mightily.... but at the end of the day... Trump's going to put someone of his choosing on the court regardless and the left may want to think long and hard about who the fight against.
 
MeToo would struggle mightily.... but at the end of the day... Trump's going to put someone of his choosing on the court regardless and the left may want to think long and hard about who the fight against.
He should have gone with a broad from the start. They'd be confirmed by now.
 
She was raped at a party where they were also in attendance? Did they know she was being raped? Did they join in? I was at a party where a girl was raped. Had no idea it occurred until about a week later. Didn’t even know the dude who did it, had never met him in my life.

Read it again.
 
Item 12 above champ.
There were guys standing in a line? Was it the bathroom line? She sat there and watched as a girl was being raped repeatedly? Holy shit! Not to mention, she regularly attended these rape rallies?

Something isn’t adding up here,
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelEer
I did - maybe you can point me to the part where she says he raped her.

The part where she said was the victim of a gang rape where Judge and Cavanaugh were present?

Are you all seriously this dense? Actually...don’t answer that.
 
Read it again.
I just read it all again, like I said, on the surface it looks horrible. I’m concerned about a couple of the items when out into context and what that implies A. For her, B. What it doesn’t explicitiy say, C. “I routinely attended parties where there was a better than average chance some girl was gonna be drugged and gang raped and I’d watch it unfold”.

Come on man, let’s put some common sense into this, just a little.
 
There were guys standing in a line? Was it the bathroom line? She sat there and watched as a girl was being raped repeatedly? Holy shit! Not to mention, she regularly attended these rape rallies?

Something isn’t adding up here,

Item 13. My bad. It’s confusing. I’m assuming you guys would have read the sworn statement by now. I can understand why you haven’t though.
 
Item 13. My bad. It’s confusing. I’m assuming you guys would have read the sworn statement by now. I can understand why you haven’t though.

Point me in the statement to where she witnessed Kavanaugh commit any crime beyond underage drinking, or where Kavanaugh committed a crime against her.
 
There were guys standing in a line? Was it the bathroom line? She sat there and watched as a girl was being raped repeatedly? Holy shit! Not to mention, she regularly attended these rape rallies?

Something isn’t adding up here,

Let alone, she was allegedly DRUGGED and GANG RAPED, and never filed a police report.
 
Item 13. My bad. It’s confusing. I’m assuming you guys would have read the sworn statement by now. I can understand why you haven’t though.
Correct: in item 13, she says she was at one of the rape rallies and was herself raped. Stop/ Also present was Kav and Judge. Stop/

Did they know it was happening and do nothing? Were they part of it? Did they even know it was occurring?
 
Correct: in item 13, she says she was at one of the rape rallies and was herself raped. Stop/ Also present was Kav and Judge. Stop/

Did they know it was happening and do nothing? Were they part of it? Did they even know it was occurring?

If they were involved in any regard in this alleged incident , she would've stated so.
 
The next argument by the left will be "She has everything to lose by signing a sworn affidavit".

That's assuming the FBI could ever disprove her allegations, which more than likely would be impossible.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT