A mythSo boom is God a "homophobe"? The restriction on their (homosexual's) behavior comes from his Word. What do those who disagree with his word call him besides irrelevant?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A mythSo boom is God a "homophobe"? The restriction on their (homosexual's) behavior comes from his Word. What do those who disagree with his word call him besides irrelevant?
More whiningSo I was listening to a talk show a hour ago where a mother attended the Notre Dame graduation for her daughter. She reported that out of over 3000 graduates in attendance, less than 100 students walked out ( and it appeared no one in the stands left ).
So three things; 1. the media grossly exaggerated what happened, 2. while they had every right to leave, a sizable number of people in attendance thought it was in very poor taste and inappropriate by booing. 3. They at least didn't interrupt his speech nor making fools of themselves by remaining and turning their backs or worse interrupting his speech.
The press once again determines what " angle" to take with the news. Usually, one that supports their agenda.
So I was listening to a talk show a hour ago where a mother attended the Notre Dame graduation for her daughter. She reported that out of over 3000 graduates in attendance, less than 100 students walked out ( and it appeared no one in the stands left ).
So three things; 1. the media grossly exaggerated what happened, 2. while they had every right to leave, a sizable number of people in attendance thought it was in very poor taste and inappropriate by booing. 3. They at least didn't interrupt his speech nor making fools of themselves by remaining and turning their backs or worse interrupting his speech.
The press once again determines what " angle" to take with the news. Usually, one that supports their agenda.
Because you hate a large part of who they are.
And as I explained, "homophobe" is a term describing those who are homophobic. There are many reasons why you wouldn't receive respect from myself, in a general sense, it's because you think (in America) you have the right to attempt to control the choices of others in this nation, due to your chosen religion.
No not at all boom. I've said they are free to practice their Sin. (they do) You on the Left do not like us (Christians) calling what they do "sinful" but that is simply what we believe based on what's in that Bible.
Now I agree with you in a tolerant society everyone should be free to practice what they believe and reject whatever rules they wish to reject. That's not without consequence, but I agree they should be free to behave or practice what they want (as long as it's not illegal)
If homosexuals are free to be as kinky as they want to be (they are) why can't people of Faith be equally free to reject their chosen behavior or characterize it as "sinful" as they believe it to be?
Why does the Left call their choice (Christians calling homosexual activity Sinful) "hateful"?
You're welcome to your opinion, obviously I disagree. If what you say is true then surely there are lawsuits associated with these instances, let them go forward.No one is being deprived of their free speech? What planet do you live on? When they are invited to speak and their speech is shut down, they are being deprived of their ability to speak. This is not hard. You can't be this stupid.
If Christians that reject homosexuality simply keptvthose feelings to themselves or within their church, well then, I don't think there would be much of an issue now would there? But you can't do that can you? No.....it has to be in legislation, public addresses, public protests, etc....No not at all boom. I've said they are free to practice their Sin. (they do) You on the Left do not like us (Christians) calling what they do "sinful" but that is simply what we believe based on what's in that Bible.
Now I agree with you in a tolerant society everyone should be free to practice what they believe and reject whatever rules they wish to reject. That's not without consequence, but I agree they should be free to behave or practice what they want (as long as it's not illegal)
If homosexuals are free to be as kinky as they want to be (they are) why can't people of Faith be equally free to reject their chosen behavior or characterize it as "sinful" as they believe it to be?
Why does the Left call their choice (Christians calling homosexual activity Sinful) "hateful"?
A myth
Then why support a bill providing federal funds for conversion therapy?Boom does not seem to understand that God gave us freewill. We can do what we want. We will eventually be judged for our actions. He simply tells us what is right and what is wrong. We then decide our own path.
What makes homophobe a disgusting term? Is germaphobe as horrible of a term?That's a fair answer. Beter than "hater". I'm sure almighty God respects your ability to also allow him to have an opinion on the subject without being called a more disgusting name like "homophobe".
Good for you boom. Almighty God is simply a "myth". He can live with that.
If Christians that reject homosexuality simply keptvthose feelings to themselves or within their church, well then, I don't think there would be much of an issue now would there? But you can't do that can you? No.....it has to be in legislation, public addresses, public protests, etc....
Never heard me clamoring for a Pence Presidency. Although I think he would be better than our current President, I wouldn't be happy. You can still tell a difference between people other than liberal or not?This board is getting very confusing.....
A few days ago several liberal posters were clamoring for a Pence Presidency and now they call him a racist homophobe.
And more confusing is what side is considered a "Snowflake".....left or right?
I don't even know how to address that nonsense.Well I'd argue the same thing for the Left's "religious views" on race, climate change, income distribution, energy use, or socialization. If they simply kept their views to themselves instead of trying to "impose" their beliefs on others without it being forced into our legislation, public addresses, movies, protests, etc wouldn't we have a much more tolerant & peaceful society boom?
So if someone doesn't agree with something they are now considered a "hater"? Looks to me like someone needs to look into the mirror.or maybe they just don't like LGBTQ haters.
What makes homophobe a disgusting term? Is germaphobe as horrible of a term?
Then why support a bill providing federal funds for conversion therapy?
I don't even know how to address that nonsense.
Yes.So if someone doesn't agree with something they are now considered a "hater"?
Several others did and I understand why they did it. Still had to point it out.Never heard me clamoring for a Pence Presidency. Although I think he would be better than our current President, I wouldn't be happy. You can still tell a difference between people other than liberal or not?
You're welcome to your opinion, obviously I disagree. If what you say is true then surely there are lawsuits associated with these instances, let them go forward.
No one has to defend the legal action of walking out on a speech. And I hear more whining from the right that college changes their kids world view, it is probably due to increased knowledge and exposure to different cultures. Or in a nutshell, diversity, who is afraid of that? banning a speech is stupid, but there are stupid liberals just like there are racist liberals, what is your point?They why the violence to stop the speeches? Why the threats to stop the speeches? It is fear. Fear that some could be persuaded that their world view is wrong. So it must be shut down.
It's the First Amendment Boom. Are you defending these actions?
They will and are. But there is no dispute about this. They were deprived of their free speech. If you are hired to give a speech and threats emerge along with violence that stops you, that is being deprived of your free speech rights. This is very, very easy.
No one has to defend the legal action of walking out on a speech. And I hear more whining from the right that college changes their kids world view, it is probably due to increased knowledge and exposure to different cultures. Or in a nutshell, diversity, who is afraid of that? banning a speech is stupid, but there are stupid liberals just like there are racist liberals, what is your point?
Let me know when the plaintiff wins one. That should be very, very easy for you to do.They will and are. But there is no dispute about this. They were deprived of their free speech. If you are hired to give a speech and threats emerge along with violence that stops you, that is being deprived of your free speech rights. This is very, very easy.
When you refer to "God", I am well aware, due to your unbelievably biased vision of the world, that you are referring to your Christian "God" as described in the Bible. And so I answered, that to many that do not subscribe to your Christian "God"'s word, he is considered a myth.Just as you said boom...a "phobia" suggests a "fear" usually unwarranted or hyped beyond sense of reality.
So you think Almighty God, the Creator of the Universe is a myth correct? Does that make you a "Godaphobe"? or "creatophobic" (one who afraid of the creation itself?)
Have you ever been on a college campus? To read your post one would think the answer is "no".There is little to no diversity of thought on campus. It is indoctrination. Only one view is taught or even permitted on the vast majority of campuses.
So you acknowledged that people are being deprived of their free speech rights? Progress.
That is a choice anyone can make at any time. Church doors are never shut on anyone, correct?First of all, Pence did not do as you suggested. I posted a response to this already. Christians want to help sinners repent and stop sinning. That's what this is all about. They want them all to be judged in a way that guarantees eternal life.
It's only called "indoctrination" when it's at Liberty University and some others. Surprised you haven't figured that out.There is little to no diversity of thought on campus. It is indoctrination. Only one view is taught or even permitted on the vast majority of campuses.
So you acknowledged that people are being deprived of their free speech rights? Progress.
That's just simply incorrect.There is little to no diversity of thought on campus. It is indoctrination. Only one view is taught or even permitted on the vast majority of campuses.
So you acknowledged that people are being deprived of their free speech rights? Progress.
Have you ever been on a college campus? To read your post one would think the answer is "no".
It's only called "indoctrination" when it's at Liberty University and some others. Surprised you haven't figured that out.
That's incorrect as well, imo. A religious university has the right to use religious views in their educational curriculum, students have a choice to attend, if they do they are accepting of those religious viewpoints. That's not indoctrination.It's only called "indoctrination" when it's at Liberty University and some others. Surprised you haven't figured that out.
That's just simply incorrect.
That's incorrect as well, imo. A religious university has the right to use religious views in their educational curriculum, students have a choice to attend, if they do they are accepting of those religious viewpoints. That's not indoctrination.
When you refer to "God", I am well aware, due to your unbelievably biased vision of the world, that you are referring to your Christian "God" as described in the Bible. And so I answered, that to many that do not subscribe to your Christian "God"'s word, he is considered a myth.
I am not afraid of God in any form, including your Christian "God", nor am I afraid of you, or anyone else, worshipping your chosen God. I have my own spiritual views, but would never see to infringe upon the rights of another to have their own spiritual views and relationships. I do fear Christian ideology from overtaking the essence of my beloved nation, the most cherished and vital aspects of American thought, liberty.
Congrats on your girls. We need to find more common ground, and love of our children is pretty uniform left or right. I might not agree with your political or religious stances, but I will say that it looks like you were a good father. I hope to follow your example in that regard. Congrats again! No small feat in today's worldLMAO. You are very, very dense. I have 5 daughters, four have attended different universities. Each was very liberal. More importantly, no one disputes that the majority of universities in this country are liberal. Perhaps with the exception of yourself who seems to live in a world outside the world the rest of us live in.
That is a choice anyone can make at any time. Church doors are never shut on anyone, correct?
But conservative political ideology is often influenced by religious ideology, and there is nothing wrong with a university openly using religious ideology to support a conservative influenced curriculum.He is not referring to religion but ideology. Liberty is a conservative college, one of the very few in the country. The vast majority are liberal.