Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NOAA needs to be defunded and people should go to prison over what they are doing.
Random drive by or on the heels of something?
Random drive by or on the heels of something?
If the massage the numbers the numbers fot their predictions. Brilliant.
Isn't it great how computer simulations work? Garbage in/Garbage out. The religion of Man Made Climate Change is just as radical as any other religion can be and just as dangerous...There's a link on the text.
NOAA is weighting particular buoys higher and other's lower to get rid of the 15 year global warming hiatus that never occurred.
Same principles they used for temperatures from 50+ years ago.
2+2 doesn't equal 4 when you replace a 2 with a 1.Evidently you failed reading comprehension - "These results do not support the notion of a “slowdown” in the increase of global surface temperature."
Good lord.
Lol, I quit worrying about the deniers, Our Defense department isn't waiting on Idiot Inhofe to start preparing.
Yes, when the Defense Department is proceeding under the assumption that climate change is happening and is planning accordingly then I think we can safely conclude that it's no longer just fringe tree huggers buying into it.
Another group is insurance companies. They too are making rates, etc on the basis that it's happening. Insurance companies make their living by assessing reality. The better they assess reality the more money they make. If climate change isn't happening and the insurance companies are wrong then anyone is free to start their own insurance companies and beat the other insurance companies at their own game.
"The Defense Department is run by Obama" Lol, and they will just do whatever he says? How bout the Pope? Obama order him around too?
The Defense Department is run by Obama for goodness sake. They will follow his orders and he is a religious zealot and has lied about global warming for years now. If you want, I can post some of his lies.
What about the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)? They are represented by 195 countries. Oops, there goes your NOAA and NASA conspiracy theory.
Yes, when the Defense Department is proceeding under the assumption that climate change is happening and is planning accordingly then I think we can safely conclude that it's no longer just fringe tree huggers buying into it.
Another group is insurance companies. They too are making rates, etc on the basis that it's happening. Insurance companies make their living by assessing reality. The better they assess reality the more money they make. If climate change isn't happening and the insurance companies are wrong then anyone is free to start their own insurance companies and beat the other insurance companies at their own game.
They've been doing this for longer than Obama has been in office.The Defense Department is run by Obama for goodness sake. They will follow his orders and he is a religious zealot and has lied about global warming for years now. If you want, I can post some of his lies.
They've been doing this for longer than Obama has been in office.
Is this a serious response? The DOD is a political organization and part of the executive branch. Why are you politics deniers ifnoring the obvious.Yes, when the Defense Department is proceeding under the assumption that climate change is happening and is planning accordingly then I think we can safely conclude that it's no longer just fringe tree huggers buying into it.
Another group is insurance companies. They too are making rates, etc on the basis that it's happening. Insurance companies make their living by assessing reality. The better they assess reality the more money they make. If climate change isn't happening and the insurance companies are wrong then anyone is free to start their own insurance companies and beat the other insurance companies at their own game.
Politics deniers and liberals now look to pope for scientific truth. Ive seen it all."The Defense Department is run by Obama" Lol, and they will just do whatever he says? How bout the Pope? Obama order him around too?
This response is precious. The point went over your head moron.Evidently you failed reading comprehension - "These results do not support the notion of a “slowdown” in the increase of global surface temperature."
Good lord.
I quit worrying about lemmings like you who believe everything your government tells you. I think all of us believe in Climate Change. It has been happening since the world started spinning. We just don't believe in man made climate change which is nothing more than a way for the government to control every aspect of your life and your money. If you haven't figured that out by now you never will.
The DoD is a political organization? WTF? I had no idea! Which positions get elected? Lol. Do you know what all falls under the Department of Defense?Is this a serious response? The DOD is a political organization and part of the executive branch. Why are you politics deniers ifnoring the obvious.
Yes, when the Defense Department is proceeding under the assumption that climate change is happening and is planning accordingly then I think we can safely conclude that it's no longer just fringe tree huggers buying into it.
Another group is insurance companies. They too are making rates, etc on the basis that it's happening. Insurance companies make their living by assessing reality. The better they assess reality the more money they make. If climate change isn't happening and the insurance companies are wrong then anyone is free to start their own insurance companies and beat the other insurance companies at their own game.
NOAA is weighting particular buoys higher and other's lower to get rid of the 15 year global warming hiatus that never occurred.
Same principles they used for temperatures from 50+ years ago.
There's a link on the text.
NOAA is weighting particular buoys higher and other's lower to get rid of the 15 year global warming hiatus that never occurred.
Same principles they used for temperatures from 50+ years ago.
Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming “hiatus.” Here we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than reported by the IPCC, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a “slowdown” in the increase of global surface temperature.
The DoD is a political organization? WTF? I had no idea! Which positions get elected? Lol. Do you know what all falls under the Department of Defense?
Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming “hiatus.” Here we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than reported by the IPCC, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a “slowdown” in the increase of global surface temperature.
The solution is taxes. The outcome is that these taxes can be redistributed.what does the solution and impact of that solution look like?
For example, what are the specifics of any courses of action (generally starting in the political realm) and what is the outcome on weather? Temperature change, less snow or rain, earth quakes, etc.
How long until recommendations in changing something lead to a change is global trends?
what does the solution and impact of that solution look like?
For example, what are the specifics of any courses of action (generally starting in the political realm) and what is the outcome on weather? Temperature change, less snow or rain, earth quakes, etc.
How long until recommendations in changing something lead to a change is global trends?
The President is elected. He chooses his Sec Def. That guy is approved by Congress. It is run by a politician. I hope that explains it well, but if you need more information reference "The Constitution of the United States of America" 1789.The DoD is a political organization? WTF? I had no idea! Which positions get elected? Lol. Do you know what all falls under the Department of Defense?
Who is the head of the DOD? Who appoints that person? Who elects the person who appoints the head of the DOD? Being that you work there I hope you know those answers.DOD is political, that's funny as hell. You guys know all about the DOD, right? There are a few of us that actually work for the DOD, numbskulls, lol.
DOD is political, that's funny as hell. You guys know all about the DOD, right? There are a few of us that actually work for the DOD, numbskulls, lol.
I do too.
what is your role in the DOD that make you say is what you did above?
What does the IRS "scandal" have to do with the rest of the post?I work with conservatives and liberals. We don't follow political ideology, we follow the law and policy. When you abandon law and policy, you can get yourself in big trouble. We constantly remind ourselves we work for the taxpayers of the US. An overwhelming majority of federal employees and agents (99.5%), regardless of which federal agency they work for, never "feel the effect" of a change in presidency. I found it humorous when so many people were losing their minds over the IRS "scandal".
Because so many posters in this thread think all federal agencies act on political ideology (if you would read my entire post, I think it would be obvious how it ties in).What does the IRS "scandal" have to do with the rest of the post?