Doc Holliday has a 63% winning percentage at Marshall...
- Thread starter dolemitebmf
- Start date
We all understand this. It's quite simple.....The tougher the schedule the harder it is to win...The weaker the schedule, the chances of winning is greater.
In Doc's case, his schedules have become so weak, he should be embarrassed to lose even one game.
In his last 27 games he is :
5-1 this year: 6 games
13-1 in 2014: 14 games
For obvious reasons, you picked up just the 2nd half (6-1) of the 2013 schedule: 7 games
2013: Strength of schedule: #122 with the weakest part of the schedule, in the 2nd half of the season. (how convenient for Doc).
First half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 43-39...Doc's record: 4-3
Second half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 31-45....Doc's record: 6-1
2014: Strength of schedule: #124
2015: Strength of schedule: #158
Average strength of schedule: 135
Doc's strength of schedules prior to that:
2010: #91
2011: #56
2012: #104
Average: 84 (51 spots stronger than what Doc has now...How pathetic is that?)
Had to get his players?
![[jumpingsmile]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/happy/happy0028.r191677.gif "Jumping Smile [jumpingsmile]")
More like, had to get his schedules.
His weak schedules had to get even weaker, to get the delusion going in Huntington.
The OP hit the nail on the head.
Last edited:
Owned yet again...We all understand this. It's quite simple.....The tougher the schedule the harder it is to win...The weaker the schedule, the chances of winning is greater.
In Doc's case, his schedules have become so weak, he should be embarrassed to lose even one game.
In his last 27 games he is :
5-1 this year: 6 games
13-1 in 2014: 14 games
For obvious reasons, you picked up just the 2nd half (6-1) of the 2013 schedule: 7 games
2013: Strength of schedule: #122 with the weakest part of the schedule, in the 2nd half of the season. (how convenient for Doc).
First half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 43-39...Doc's record: 4-3
Second half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 31-45....Doc's record: 6-1
2014: Strength of schedule: #124
2015: Strength of schedule: #158
Average strength of schedule: 135
Doc's strength of schedules prior to that:
2010: #91
2011: #56
2012: #104
Average: 84 (51 spots stronger than what Doc has now...How pathetic is that?)
Had to get his players?
More like, had to get his schedules.
His weak schedules had to get even weaker, to get the delusion going in Huntington.
The OP hit the nail on the head.
No wonder they hate you enough to commit group suicide over you owning them on their own board. RIP TITM...We all understand this. It's quite simple.....The tougher the schedule the harder it is to win...The weaker the schedule, the chances of winning is greater.
In Doc's case, his schedules have become so weak, he should be embarrassed to lose even one game.
In his last 27 games he is :
5-1 this year: 6 games
13-1 in 2014: 14 games
For obvious reasons, you picked up just the 2nd half (6-1) of the 2013 schedule: 7 games
2013: Strength of schedule: #122 with the weakest part of the schedule, in the 2nd half of the season. (how convenient for Doc).
First half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 43-39...Doc's record: 4-3
Second half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 31-45....Doc's record: 6-1
2014: Strength of schedule: #124
2015: Strength of schedule: #158
Average strength of schedule: 135
Doc's strength of schedules prior to that:
2010: #91
2011: #56
2012: #104
Average: 84 (51 spots stronger than what Doc has now...How pathetic is that?)
Had to get his players?
More like, had to get his schedules.
His weak schedules had to get even weaker, to get the delusion going in Huntington.
The OP hit the nail on the head.
We all understand this. It's quite simple.....The tougher the schedule the harder it is to win...The weaker the schedule, the chances of winning is greater.
In Doc's case, his schedules have become so weak, he should be embarrassed to lose even one game.
In his last 27 games he is :
5-1 this year: 6 games
13-1 in 2014: 14 games
For obvious reasons, you picked up just the 2nd half (6-1) of the 2013 schedule: 7 games
2013: Strength of schedule: #122 with the weakest part of the schedule, in the 2nd half of the season. (how convenient for Doc).
First half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 43-39...Doc's record: 4-3
Second half of 2013 opponents' combined record: 31-45....Doc's record: 6-1
2014: Strength of schedule: #124
2015: Strength of schedule: #158
Average strength of schedule: 135
Doc's strength of schedules prior to that:
2010: #91
2011: #56
2012: #104
Average: 84 (51 spots stronger than what Doc has now...How pathetic is that?)
Had to get his players?
More like, had to get his schedules.
His weak schedules had to get even weaker, to get the delusion going in Huntington.
The OP hit the nail on the head.
Kinda puts Marshall's "success" in perspective, huh?
And Holgs had how many players on his team who went to the NFL, including Geno yet couldn't manage anything more than a mediocre season finished with the Pinstripe Bowl.
Yeah, you got a real winner on your hands. Doc was left with nothing when he came in. On the other hand, BS handed the keys to the Porsche only to let AlcoHolgorson ram it into a telephone pole.
Yeah, you got a real winner on your hands. Doc was left with nothing when he came in. On the other hand, BS handed the keys to the Porsche only to let AlcoHolgorson ram it into a telephone pole.
LMAO...apples to oranges...if BS or DH had mooU's schedule they both would have undefeated seasons...and beat no one!! Deflect all you want that is a fact!!!
Holgorsen has done something that Marshall never has and never will....win a BCS bowl.
I'm confused, Kitty. Does all that mean that we aren't 24-3 in our last 27 games? Does it mean that we haven't played in consecutive conference championship games? Does it mean that we haven't won consecutive bowl games? Does it mean that we aren't the defending conference champion? Does it mean we didn't end last season ranked?
Sorry, not me on the first two, but I did put a great mom joke on you. Well, since it was true, not sure you can call it a joke, so I am guilty on commenting on my sexual conquest of your mother. I apologize, probably should have let you know that I'm your daddy by PM instead of on the board.
Similar threads
