Bingo. It is the all-or-none approach that people argue that results in nothing ever being done to reduce the problem. The US will never reach a point where there are no mass shootings or homicides involving firearms. Using the rationale "criminals will still break the law" is just a foolish position. The goal should be to reduce the number of incidents because eliminating them entirely isn't going to happen.
It reminds me of the left pointing out that illegals will still get into the US with Trump's border wall so why waste our time and money building it? The wall isn't designed to prevent 100% of illegals from getting into the US. It is designed to reduce that number by making it more difficult.
It is amazing how the right argues against this silly logic when applied to the border wall but spew the same foolish logic when it comes to firearms.
I have said it before the right and left are mirror images of each other.
Ok. Give us a list of the compromise you want to see. Be as specific as you can so we all understand where you are in the subject.