Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
|
They weren't able to prove it. I knew it was going to be rejected, I told my wife the same thing. Repubs are going to have to do the same thing, ballet harvest. It's disgusting but the courts have allowed it
do you find it odd at all that both trump and lake's lawsuits alleging widespread election fraud ultimately get tossed by the courts due to lack of evidence? Are the courts and judges across America in on it too? Even the one's who identify republican? if the fraud is so widespread, why is it seemingly so hard to prove in a court of law?
Do you believe OJ killed Nichole?do you find it odd at all that both trump and lake's lawsuits alleging widespread election fraud ultimately get tossed by the courts due to lack of evidence? Are the courts and judges across America in on it too? Even the one's who identify republican? if the fraud is so widespread, why is it seemingly so hard to prove in a court of law?
I find it odd that in America, there is even a question on the legitimacy of elections. And it 100% happens on both sides.do you find it odd at all that both trump and lake's lawsuits alleging widespread election fraud ultimately get tossed by the courts due to lack of evidence? Are the courts and judges across America in on it too? Even the one's who identify republican? if the fraud is so widespread, why is it seemingly so hard to prove in a court of law?
yes I believe OJ killed Nicole.. but that's my personal opinion based on the evidence I saw presented during the trial.. which was a criminal case and jury trial .. different than civil cases in front of a judge that I believe the election lawsuits have been..Do you believe OJ killed Nichole?
Paper ballot and photo ID
Stop all the questioning.
as I have found more often than not in these 'discussions', I am pretty much in agreement with you.. There is undoubtedly some level of fraud or issues in most elections, IMO.. but is it widespread and material enough to have changed the results? I'd like to think in our society and system that if that were the case the truth would eventually come out and be proven....in a court of law and not just in the court of public opinion. To date at least, that doesn't appear to be the case.I find it odd that in America, there is even a question on the legitimacy of elections. And it 100% happens on both sides.
I also 100% believe there is fraud with mass mail-in ballots. I find it ludicrous to believe there isn’t. The ability to ballet harvest without the ability to verify the validity of the vote is there. It requires faith to assume 100% everyone voting is on the up and up and it shouldn’t require faith.
I’d personally be in favor of Election Day being a federal holiday, have 100% ID requirements for in-person voting, allow 1 month early voting and vote by mail being the exception for military and stringent exogenous circumstances. We shouldn’t have a question about our elections.
At a minimum, if you’re not in favor of ID to vote, you’re not in favor of election security.
Always ask questions, I do .yes I believe OJ killed Nicole.. but that's my personal opinion based on the evidence I saw presented during the trial.. which was a criminal case and jury trial .. different than civil cases in front of a judge that I believe the election lawsuits have been..
I think it's fair to ask why none of the election fraud cases have advanced or gone anywhere in a court of law in terms of proving evidence of widespread fraud that would have changed the results.. unless it's all just an orchestrated cover up across multiple courts and judges?
and why do I have to stop asking questions? You don't have to answer you know.