So, I looked at the pass D last year
- By NCDawg
- The Blue Lot
- 2 Replies
and maybe this gives us some reason for optimism since it has to be better, right? RIGHT?
tldr: we played 13 games last year. in 8 of them, we allowed 2 different WRs to have a 40+ yard reception. The other games weren't even that pretty. Like AZ, where one guy destroyed us.
Penn St: 50, 55 - so again, this was the long reception for 2 different players, not one guy with 2 long catches
Albany: 41, 49 and a 3rd with a 33 yarder
pitt: 42, 40
Kansas - a true success story, the only game without a 40+ yard reception allowed. 36 was the high
Okie St: 43, 41
Iowa St: 60, 37 and a 34 by a 3rd WR.
Kansas St: 60, 53
Arizona: 49 (so only one player but we gave up 202 yards to him) TAMPA 2!!!!!!
Cincy: 80 (again, this is one of our better pass D showings)
Baylor: 43, 40
UCF: 45
Texas Tech: 41, 31 and 30
Memphis: 89 and 48
I mean, a modicum of competence and we can likely cut this list in half. But in basically every game we played minus Kansas, we gave up at LEAST one backbreaking reception.
tldr: we played 13 games last year. in 8 of them, we allowed 2 different WRs to have a 40+ yard reception. The other games weren't even that pretty. Like AZ, where one guy destroyed us.
Penn St: 50, 55 - so again, this was the long reception for 2 different players, not one guy with 2 long catches
Albany: 41, 49 and a 3rd with a 33 yarder
pitt: 42, 40
Kansas - a true success story, the only game without a 40+ yard reception allowed. 36 was the high
Okie St: 43, 41
Iowa St: 60, 37 and a 34 by a 3rd WR.
Kansas St: 60, 53
Arizona: 49 (so only one player but we gave up 202 yards to him) TAMPA 2!!!!!!
Cincy: 80 (again, this is one of our better pass D showings)
Baylor: 43, 40
UCF: 45
Texas Tech: 41, 31 and 30
Memphis: 89 and 48
I mean, a modicum of competence and we can likely cut this list in half. But in basically every game we played minus Kansas, we gave up at LEAST one backbreaking reception.