Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL..... So, you're disputing the main source of information on energy in the US. The EIA is a government agency that IS the bible on energy facts. You might as well go back to watching CNN ..... or get back out in the streets and protest some more... You're nothing but a dumbass.....
LMAO! That is where just about all of the info I have posted has come from and you have been arguing against it but now admit it is the Bible. That is where the cost info came from. That is where the percentage of electricity generation came from.
So you do concede less than 50% of electricity is now produced from coal, coal is not the most economical or lowest total cost form of electricity production and more than 2% of electricity is produced from renewables?
You are incredibly stupid. LMAO!
I know the numbers. But you've missed all my main points... every one of them. Here's my top 10:LMAO! That is where just about all of the info I have posted has come from and you have been arguing against it but now admit it is the Bible. That is where the cost info came from. That is where the percentage of electricity generation came from.
So you do concede less than 50% of electricity is now produced from coal, coal is not the most economical or lowest total cost form of electricity production and more than 2% of electricity is produced from renewables?
You are incredibly stupid. LMAO!
I know the numbers. But you've missed all my main points... every one of them. Here's my top 10:
1) Fossil Fuels still supply over 80% of the US and the world's energy requirements.
2) Renewables supply 11% of the total US energy requirement. This includes hydro, geothermal and biomass, which are not expected to grow much.
3) Solar and wind, supply only 3.7% of the US energy requirement.
4) Solar supplies LESS than 1% of the US energy requirement.
5) Even though wind and solar represent only 3.7% of the US total energy needs, they saw significant growth over the past 10 years, in large part because Obama issued tax incentives and other subsidies.
6) The total cost of solar and wind (capital, financing, operating, etc.) has come down a lot over the past 10 years which makes them much more competitive with fossil fuels.
7) Fossil fuels offer a major advantage against wind and solar because they are not intermittent. Current (battery) storage capacity won't allow too much concentration of wind and solar because of blackouts when there is no wind or sun.
8) Ongoing energy cost to produce BTU's show that coal is slightly cheaper than natural gas, but new coal plants have higher capital costs and produce twice the CO2 as natural gas. That's why the total cost of gas is cheaper than coal for new plants. This is not the case in most parts of the world, where low-cost natural gas is not available. That is why coal is the number 1 fuel for power generation in the world.
9) Obama's regulations prematurely closed 100's of coal-fired power plants which harmed a large part of WV's population. Everyone knows this but you. Both Clinton and Biden have stated that they will continue the assault on all fossil fuels. The people in WV know that the Democrats couldn't care less about our energy state, so Trump destroyed Clinton and will destroy Biden in the election. You've stated that the reason is that the people in WV are stupid. This is totally not true, you're a moron and shouldn't even attend our sporting events with the rest of the fans that love WV and the people of our state.
10) Our country needs WV metallurgical coal to send to US steel companies to manufacture steel. Thank a coal miner if you use anything made of steel.
If he’s actually ever been in the coal business, he won’t be for much longer, not with his level of denial and ignorance.Didn’t bother reading. You’re obviously wrong on percentage of total electricity generation from coal, percentage of total electricity generation from renewables and total cost to produce electricity from various sources. With all of this discussion, you haven’t even cited once, “the Bible” for anyone in the coal industry. Yeah, you are a very poorly informed person in the industry, if you actually are in the industry.
If he’s actually ever been in the coal business, he won’t be for much longer, not with his level of denial and ignorance.
Coal gets debated here at length about once a year and I used to show all sorts of our Mercury impact data every time. Not worth it anymore with these clowns. Coal is dying and it’s still dirty. If they want to argue otherwise, let em.If he’s actually ever been in the coal business, he won’t be for much longer, not with his level of denial and ignorance.
As I said earlier ITT, you have been refreshingly informative on this topic, and it is beyond me how anyone could dismiss the future of coal in our immediate energy future both as a low cost alternative to more expensive sources and an effective basis for domestic manufacturing of steel or other by products which is a national domestic manufacturing strategy of the Trump administration.
There are no economically viable substitutes for fossil fuels to fly our Commercial Jet aircraft, power our locomotives, run our heavy haulers and equipment, or supply our U.S. armed forces. In short, the very lifeblood of our way of life and free enterprise economic system depends on the uninterruptible supply of domestically produced fossil fuels. Also as you have accurately pointed out, significant portions the world's economy also depend on them and the Unites States is strategically positioned to provide the vast majority of that low cost energy to the world thanks in part to coal.
So to sum up, fossil fuels protect our Freedom, and guarantee we can rely on it being protected. Anyone who doesn't realize fossil fuels will be a basic energy fact for us for at least the next half century until technology moves us to its low cost replacement is anti-American, anti-Capitalism and anti Freedom.
Appreciate your posts in this thread.
I know the numbers. But you've missed all my main points... every one of them. Here's my top 10:
1) Fossil Fuels still supply over 80% of the US.
2) Renewables supply 11% of the total US energy requirement.
3) Solar and wind, supply only 3.7% of the US energy requirement.
4) Solar supplies LESS than 1% of the US energy requirement.
5) Even though wind and solar represent only 3.7% of the US total energy needs, they saw significant growth over the past 10 years, in large part because Obama issued tax incentives and other subsidies.
6) The total cost of solar and wind (capital, financing, operating, etc.) has come down a lot over the past 10 years which makes them much more competitive with fossil fuels.
7) Fossil fuels offer a major advantage against wind and solar because they are not intermittent. Current (battery) storage capacity won't allow too much concentration of wind and solar because of blackouts when there is no wind or sun.
8) Ongoing energy cost to produce BTU's show that coal is slightly cheaper than natural gas, but new coal plants have higher capital costs and produce twice the CO2 as natural gas. That's why the total cost of gas is cheaper than coal for new plants. This is not the case in most parts of the world, where low-cost natural gas is not available. That is why coal is the number 1 fuel for power generation in the world.
9) Obama's regulations prematurely closed 100's of coal-fired power plants which harmed a large part of WV's population. Everyone knows this but you. Both Clinton and Biden have stated that they will continue the assault on all fossil fuels. The people in WV know that the Democrats couldn't care less about our energy state, so Trump destroyed Clinton and will destroy Biden in the election. You've stated that the reason is that the people in WV are stupid. This is totally not true, you're a moron and shouldn't even attend our sporting events with the rest of the fans that love WV and the people of our state.
10) Our country needs WV metallurgical coal to send to US steel companies to manufacture steel. Thank a coal miner if you use anything made of steel.
Fossil Fuels Still Supply 84 Percent Of World Energy — And Other Eye Openers From BP’s Annual Review
The BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020 has been released. Here are the major highlights.www.google.com
Fossil Fuels Still Supply 84 Percent Of World Energy — And Other Eye Openers From BP’s Annual Review
This is the kid of information Global warming "climate change" Leftists hate to face. All the while they sit in their comfortably air conditioning homes, watch T-V on their 65 inch 4HDTV's and drive their 70K Luxury Sport SUVs....all powered by fossil fuels.
My god, I know your mother must have dropped you on your head when you were young. And you had to be a pathetic student. You don't read... you just like to run your big mouth. I've repeated over and over that there are two different subjects being discussed in this post: I'm talking about total energy used in the United States and the world which includes:1) wrong - for 2019, coal was 23% and nat gas was 38% of all electricity generation in the US. Nuclear was 20% and all renewable was 17.5%
2) wrong - see 1 above.
3) wrong - wind alone is 7.3%.
4) wrong - solar is 1.8%
5) wrong - see 3 and 4 above.
there is no need to go anyfurther. You are not John Schroder. Anyone who has an MBA is not this stupid.
People should get a quote for a solar system to run their homes. EXPENSIVE to buy. EXPENSIVE to buy replacement batteries.
My god, I know your mother must have dropped you on your head when you were young. And you had to be a pathetic student. You don't read... you just like to run your big mouth. I've repeated over and over that there are two different subjects being discussed in this post: I'm talking about total energy used in the United States and the world which includes:
1) Power generation from utility plants (gas, coal nuclear, solar, wind, etc.) and put out on the electrical grid
2) Petroleum burned by automobiles, airplanes, trains, etc.
3) Gas, coal, solar, etc. direct burned in large industrial plants
4) Natural gas, solar, etc. plumbed directly into homes and used along with power off the utility grid
5) Coal used in the steel making process (in coke batteries, furnaces, coal injection)
6) etc.
In other words, ALL energy burned for every application in the US. The percentages that you keep throwing out are for my number 1) only - Power generated for the grid.
I swear, dirt road, you're a real dumbass. A hateful, stupid dumbass.
And BTW, I've got an engineering degree and MBA from WVU. Schroder worked for me before I left to start up another company. Now piss off asshole.
My god, I know your mother must have dropped you on your head when you were young. And you had to be a pathetic student. You don't read... you just like to run your big mouth. I've repeated over and over that there are two different subjects being discussed in this post: I'm talking about total energy used in the United States and the world which includes:
1) Power generation from utility plants (gas, coal nuclear, solar, wind, etc.) and put out on the electrical grid
2) Petroleum burned by automobiles, airplanes, trains, etc.
3) Gas, coal, solar, etc. direct burned in large industrial plants
4) Natural gas, solar, etc. plumbed directly into homes and used along with power off the utility grid
5) Coal used in the steel making process (in coke batteries, furnaces, coal injection)
6) etc.
In other words, ALL energy burned for every application in the US. The percentages that you keep throwing out are for my number 1) only - Power generated for the grid.
I swear, dirt road, you're a real dumbass. A hateful, stupid dumbass.
And BTW, I've got an engineering degree and MBA from WVU. Schroder worked for me before I left to start up another company. Now piss off asshole.
Well, his/her/its profile pic does say it all. This was fun, but I'm finished here. Thanks for your support for coal and WV ATL. I appreciate it. I'll catch you over in the blue lot where we can all agree (most of the time) Cheers!I can't understand why you'd even attempt to talk verified facts with that near comatose poster?
Well, his profile pic does say it all. This was fun, but I'm finished here. Thanks for your support for coal and WV ATL. I appreciate it. I'll catch you over in the blue lot where we can all agree (most of the time) Cheers!
My god, I know your mother must have dropped you on your head when you were young. And you had to be a pathetic student. You don't read... you just like to run your big mouth. I've repeated over and over that there are two different subjects being discussed in this post: I'm talking about total energy used in the United States and the world which includes:
1) Power generation from utility plants (gas, coal nuclear, solar, wind, etc.) and put out on the electrical grid
2) Petroleum burned by automobiles, airplanes, trains, etc.
3) Gas, coal, solar, etc. direct burned in large industrial plants
4) Natural gas, solar, etc. plumbed directly into homes and used along with power off the utility grid
5) Coal used in the steel making process (in coke batteries, furnaces, coal injection)
6) etc.
In other words, ALL energy burned for every application in the US. The percentages that you keep throwing out are for my number 1) only - Power generated for the grid.
I swear, dirt road, you're a real dumbass. A hateful, stupid dumbass.
And BTW, I've got an engineering degree and MBA from WVU. Schroder worked for me before I left to start up another company. Now piss off asshole.
Hahahahahaha. Idiot is mad.. Come back again for another ass kicking. It’s been fun showing the board just how big of a dumbass you are.
1) wrong - for 2019, coal was 23% and nat gas was 38% of all electricity generation in the US. Nuclear was 20% and all renewable was 17.5%
2) wrong - see 1 above.
.3) wrong - wind alone is 7.3%.
4) wrong - solar is 1.8%
5) wrong - see 3 and 4 above.
there is no need to go any further. You are not John Schroder. Anyone who has an MBA is not this stupid