It’s never been a secret, I’ve told my story on here numerous times. Not sure what the difference is between brick and mortar and online is in your mind.
New Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick details parties where girls were drugged and raped
- Thread starter moe
- Start date
I always love when people who say that conservatives discriminate against anybody that's not a white male, but will try to put someone down as being inferior because they did not go to college (in your case, not the right college)
I thought I was being objective. Bork was nominated in 1987, followed closely by Ginsburg, not the 70's. I was in high school in the 80s. The only pot legalization you heard about was on the fringes. The most liberal member of Congress at that time wasn't even discussing legalization.
I didn't accuse Thomas of rape. The charge against him was sexual harassment. Others were willing to testify about that sort of behavior. They were not called to testify before the committee.
#3 is crazy stalker woman.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018...aining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348
https://www.politico.com/story/2018...aining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348
Obviously your boy hit a nerve with you and now you’re searching for rationalization. Tell us what Avenatti has gotten wrong about trump? You’ll recall that was what the original tweet was all about.
I don't know, and don't care about CPL. He's about as important as Benny Hill to this process.
which one was the 3rd? I’ve honestly lost track at this point. There’s so many. Another one again tonight. Shew.
But if you’re talking about Swetnick? Avenatti’s client? Yep. I believe her. But I should probably wait until 4Chan weighs in. lmao
that must explain why you keep posting tweets that are critical of him. lol
The one tonight about Rhode Island already recanted, the one that said he aggressively pressed on her was known and investigated by the FBI as part of the background check and found not credible.
Wanna keep going?
But you’re asking about Swetnick, no? I mean... how many is an acceptable number for you? 2? 3? lol
By all means...keep going. Die on that hill.
I’ve come to the conclusion that some of these guys live in a bubble where news gets to them really late, possibly never or completely fake. I’ve learned to deal with it and adjusted accordingly. I only know of three accusers. Ford, Avenatti’s client and the woman who said he stuck his dick in her face. The new one tonight was anonymous so that ain’t going anywhere. DD must’ve latched onto some fake news somewhere and deduced that EVERYONE is lying...because he’s a critical thinker and all.
#1 - supposedly testifying tomorrow on very shaky ground - no locations, no dates
#2 - dear New Yorker. Yeah, that's all we're doing. No locations, no dates, and no testimony
#3 - creepy stalker woman hires creepy porn lawyer, woah wait, she had #1's lawyer 10 years ago also, and that story scrubbed. no locations, no dates, doesn't accuse Kavanaugh of anything but drinking
#4 - rape on a boat - died within an hour
#5 - anonymous letter with no names, no return addresses
ROCK SOLID CASE!
Betting a turd in the punch bowl will go over better than the results Radical Libs are hoping for tomorrow.
How many are acceptable? Easy, 1 credible one. Of the 5 let’s recap:
1. Ford: no time, date, location and the people she claimed were there have denied it occurred. A poly where the only 2 questions asked were on her written statement. 2 separate men have claimed to the committee were the ones who had the interaction with Dr. Ford. Hmmmm let’s hear her out.
2. Ramirez: She’s not even sure it was him and the NYT passed
3. Swetnick: This one is laughable. She attended numerous (significantly more than 10) rape rallies and did nothing. She herself was raped and alleged Kav and Judge were at the party, doesn’t even allege they knew of it, just that they were there. Continues to attend same rape rallies for another year. Never made an accusation against a single person who allegedly raped any of the girls, or her for that matter, but felt it important to point out that Kav and Judge were at the party. Never named any of the other women to corroborate that there were in fact rape rallies. This is a bullshit liar. And you actually believe this one, that’s hilarious.
4. Anonymous letter to Colorado Sen. (The DC drunken aggressiveness in 98) taken to the FBI in conjunction with Lindsey Graham. FBI checks it out and discounts it. More bullshit and the fact MSNBC ran with this says more about their motives.
5. Some lunatic in Rhode Island made a claim that in 85 something happened on a boat. Ooooops, he has recanted this allegation this evening. Coincidentally, he also claimed Trump should be taken down by a military coup and charges Trump with manslaughter.
In not a single one of these have these women gone to authorities to file a charge even now, even though the statute of limitations is still in effect. Odd.
And I’m the one dying on a hill? Hahahhaa
#resistanceisfutile
If true, ................ Custer had better odds than Kavanugh’s confirmation being derailed.
Well, if this turns out to be credible, pretty much wraps up that hearing for tomorrow.
Wouldn’t shock me if the GOP decided to start playing the same game by putting out bullshit to see if they can cause the left to blink.
I also grew up in the 80's and I was not a fringe player. While at WVU most of my friends who smoked pot could not understand why is was not legalized. Did not say it was in a political forum but that the left was pro pot and they used that to derail a SC justice-the very thing that they were doing themselves. At the time, it was discussed within my circle that to be bullied because he smoked pot was dirty politics.
