MAGA gets slapped again
- Thread starter moe
- Start date
Who do you want to see get elected President and what policies of theirs do you support the most? So far all I hear is Orange Man Bad.
He is a globalist socialists..... so to him anything that says America first he is against.
If they are not socialists than they would support Trump's policies as long as it wasn't Trump pushing them . ...other words they are shallow bastards.
!00 % support for a presidential candidate is impossible.. There are too many thought worthy issues to get complete support. I suppose 'Orange Man Bad" is as worthy in many people's view.
They targeted the emotional unstable to produce useful idiots. If they think things improve if they replace Biden they are mistaken. The problem is the New Democrat Parties Policies. Finding someone younger to push the same progressive policies isn't going to fix anything.
Then there are these idiots.
I wonder what they are really worried about?
www.washingtonexaminer.com
www.washingtonexaminer.com
I wonder what they are really worried about?
Ted Cruz: 'Pedophiles' at Lincoln Project need to stop talking about my children
Sen. Ted Cruz took a swing at the Lincoln Project on Monday after the anti-Republican activist group criticized the senator with a reference to his children. The Never Trump organization posted a clip on social media of one of the group’s founders, Steve Schmidt, criticizing Cruz’s rebuke of the...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Ted Cruz: 'Pedophiles' at Lincoln Project need to stop talking about my children
Documents show Never-Trump Lincoln Project founders had ties to Russia and tax debt: Report
Several leaders of the Never-Trump organization The Lincoln Project have checkered financial histories. Filings at the Justice Department show John Weaver, co-founder of the organization, registered as a Russian foreign agent last year on behalf of uranium conglomerate TENEX, the New York Post...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Documents show Never-Trump Lincoln Project founders had ties to Russia and tax debt: Report
No one who supports this Neo-Malthusianism you've posted here Gunny my man neither Worships nor believes in the providence of Almighty God over human affairs.
So absent that respect or belief for the author of Human Life itself, is it any wonder how casually they dismiss ending the innocent lives of unborn babies?
This is the Spirit of anti-Christ. This is Spiritual Warfare. Thanks for posting.
@NYC_Eer why can't you honestly answer this?
What I don't understand however is your reasoning or even what your own particular beliefs are about it? So tell me, why do you favor killing an innocent baby (for any reason) before it's born?
If you do not support that, or you don't think that's an innocent baby being killed before it is born, then what is it when it's killed?
Explain please?
It's a simple "yes" or "no". It would be helpful if you could explain why or why not as easily as you accused believers of being "forced" into their views on this but that's OK you're entitled to your own opinions about that.
What I don't understand however is your reasoning or even what your own particular beliefs are about it? So tell me, why do you favor killing an innocent baby (for any reason) before it's born?
If you do not support that, or you don't think that's an innocent baby being killed before it is born, then what is it when it's killed?
Explain please?
Not sure....happened about 50 years ago and the %s of people in favor have only increased.
It's not a "gotcha" question I've asked you in post #288. I simply want you to explain your own reasoning for being OK killing an innocent baby before it's born (if you're OK with that?)
Or equally, why that's not OK with you? I'm also growing more and more curious why you refuse to answer that?
NYC is messed up. Manhattan isn't nearly as bad as the outer boroughs, but your point is still valid. That is more from poor management and all the shit that came from COVID than lack of accountability, but to some extent that is probably one and the same. The lack of accountability coming from the lack of prosecution is crazy, and definitely placed squarely at the feet of the Democrats.
The comment about an abortion clinic on every corner is a bit silly though. That isn't true. Its not worse in NYC than any other place. You can see the people in red states are voting against restrictions as well. And a free society should also allow women to have control over their own bodies IMO. Again, I not a staunch supporter, because it doesn't affect me. I just think its the right thing. On that we will disagree...no bridging that gap.
Because I don't sit on this site all day and wait for you to ask me questions.
And I'm not answering a question about killing innocent babies, because I don't believe that is what they are doing.
I get it you said that! I'm simply asking WHY you don't believe that? It doesn't take any more time for you to tap out a few lines explaining your thoughts on why that's NOT killing an innocent baby than it took for you to tap out a few lines accusing believers of creating this issue because they're being "forced" into it.
You volunteered your opinions about them on this without being asked now you're being asked to volunteer your own thoughts on it and you can't defend yourself?
You're special.
Last edited:
Why are you libtards soo obsessed with Trump? Should be another easy victory for Biden in 2024, unless he didn’t really win.
He can't answer why he doesn't think abortion is killing an innocent baby? Point made, point proven.
They're scared to death he's even running again and is the current front runner. They know if he wins the GOP nomination, his chances of winning a "clean" re-election are exponentially better than Biden cheating again to beat him.
Most of them if they don't already suspect Biden cheated the first time, do not want to see him running against Trump in a rematch. It's almost as if they know he only won the first time because the creep cheated!
The percentage of people who support socialism has increased as well . Point is people who support abortions don't want accountability for there actions or choice . People who don't want accountability for bad choices tend to want others to pay for them and search to blame others.
Can agree on most of that .
Joking about every corner.
If it's about woman's rights and their body I could agree as I didn't believe in the Vax mandates or many other bullshit laws that involve our bodies. Problem is its not the woman's right to murder to better her life . It's not her right to murder because she had a laps in judgment and made a bad choice. Could argue when life begins.... since they claim a woman's body a woman's choice, what if it's a baby girl don't she get a choice? .... again a woman has many choices about her reproduction that no person should be able to stop , she has unlimited birth control at her fingertips and most is provided free of charge and I'm all for taxpayers providing it .... she has every opportunity to make a good choice and in a free country she choose to make a bad one and murder to make up for it ...
The accountability in NYC is awful. Most have the opportunity to make a choice to work and be educated or become criminals...they are becoming criminals with no accountability.
They support Socialism because many feel they have been screwed over or don't truly understand where it leads. History shows it leads to tyranny and alot of deaths. They don't understand that because the education system was infiltrated a long time ago. Now the CCP and others are using Crony Capitalism to push more in that direction. Having Social programs to lift people up is one thing. Unfortunately it's not sustainable with how far they want to go with it.
Well yeah ...
They start supporting it because they think it's a easier life and they can't make good choices for themselves to be productive. They feel it's better to rely on government to provide their needs from taking from the rich ... that's how they sell it to the kids in school. They take all ACCOUNTABILITY away from the individual and put it on the government. It's what makes it appealing to young people. They tell them they have done no wrong and it's someone else's fault they stole or whatever...get pregnant...
Right now they are using as a political weapon to destroy our country from within. Those that just wanted affordable Healthcare and European Socialist Lite are in for a rude awakening.
Because your questions is pointed and simplistic. It’s not murder. Ask a better question and maybe I’ll answer it
No I've asked it clearly enough. Just an endless string of "contradictions" from @NYC_Eer in this thread going from "he doesn't really care about the issue of abortion" all the way over to blaming Trump and people of Faith for creating the controversy as a "losing issue". At the end of it all, despite all of his unsubstantiated accusations and strong opinions on it, HE himself cannot explain when he either supports or opposes it? 🤔
Let me demonstrate
Arguing opposition to late term abortions, he agrees it is almost never medically necessary to kill a baby in order to save the Life of the mother and it actually happens in less than 1% of all abortions!
Arguing the issue doesn't effect him, he essentially dismisses it in its entirety!
How can anyone take him seriously on this issue? He's opposed to late term abortions but OK with them as long as they're done to save the mother's life. He admits that's less than 1% of all abortions, yet uses that very argument to support a woman's right to kill her unwanted baby in 98% of all the rest of abortion cases! He doesn't think that's what she's doing (killing an unwanted innocent baby) yet he can't explain what else it is she's doing if she's not deciding to kill an innocent baby she simply doesn't want? How much more confused can one person be on one issue he doesn't care anything about?
He won't explain himself to correct his obviously contradictory statements, but he nevertheless "doesn't care" about it so he predicts it's a sure fire losing issue for Trump and Republicans? That all by itself minus all the other double speak is simply another giant self-admitted contradiction!
@NYC_Eer
That's it...I've had it with you atl! 'Ya know you must really enjoy watching me do this because you're always pointing out how I run off from these threads after you start questioning my incoherence in them. Bye man!
I thought you'd eventually get tired of running off from your own two faced statements all the time, but apparently the more you make them & then are asked to explain yourself, the more all you offer us is this! 😏 He's pretty good at it too don't 'ya'll think?
Let me demonstrate
Arguing opposition to late term abortions, he agrees it is almost never medically necessary to kill a baby in order to save the Life of the mother and it actually happens in less than 1% of all abortions!
However he turns right back around and argues for late term abortions fully aware they're almost never medically necessary and in fact are the most rare of all abortions performed!
Arguing the issue doesn't effect him, he essentially dismisses it in its entirety!
Then he turns right back around and suggests the issue is important, given prominence only because so called "Religious folks" use it to force onto others as it's forced onto them!
So it was pointed out to him it's Religious people speaking out against the heinous nature of abortion, which is in fact killing an innocent baby for whatever reason is used to justify it and he was asked if he's OK calling it out for what it is?
Now mind you, he's already spent quite a bit of time ITT, giving us his various opinions about the issue, while claiming it nevertheless doesn't effect him, yet when asked to express his own particular views on it he simply refused!
Another contradiction. He doesn't care about the issue, and of course has no opinion on it because it doesn't effect him, yet here he clearly states that he doesn't think whatever you call it, it's NOT killing an innocent baby!
How can anyone take him seriously on this issue? He's opposed to late term abortions but OK with them as long as they're done to save the mother's life. He admits that's less than 1% of all abortions, yet uses that very argument to support a woman's right to kill her unwanted baby in 98% of all the rest of abortion cases! He doesn't think that's what she's doing (killing an unwanted innocent baby) yet he can't explain what else it is she's doing if she's not deciding to kill an innocent baby she simply doesn't want? How much more confused can one person be on one issue he doesn't care anything about?
He won't explain himself to correct his obviously contradictory statements, but he nevertheless "doesn't care" about it so he predicts it's a sure fire losing issue for Trump and Republicans? That all by itself minus all the other double speak is simply another giant self-admitted contradiction!
@NYC_Eer
That's it...I've had it with you atl! 'Ya know you must really enjoy watching me do this because you're always pointing out how I run off from these threads after you start questioning my incoherence in them. Bye man!
I thought you'd eventually get tired of running off from your own two faced statements all the time, but apparently the more you make them & then are asked to explain yourself, the more all you offer us is this! 😏 He's pretty good at it too don't 'ya'll think?
Last edited:
No one is reading your drivel.No I've asked it clearly enough. Just an endless string of "contradictions" from @NYC_Eer in this thread going from "he doesn't really care about the issue of abortion" all the way over to blaming Trump and people of Faith for creating the controversy as a "losing issue". At the end of it all, despite all of his unsubstantiated accusations and strong opinions on it, HE himself cannot state why he both supports and opposes it? 🤔
Let me demonstrate
Arguing opposition to late term abortions, he agrees it is almost never medically necessary to kill a baby in order to save the Life of the mother and it actually happens in less than 1% of all abortions!
However he turns right back around and argues for late term abortions fully aware they're almost never medically necessary and in fact are the most rare of all abortions performed!
Arguing the issue doesn't effect him, he essentially dismisses it in its entirety!
Then he turns right back around and suggests the issue is important, given prominence only because so called "Religious folks" use it to force onto others as it's forced onto them!
So it was pointed out to him it's Religious people speaking out against the heinous nature of abortion, which is in fact is killing an innocent baby for whatever reason is used to justify it and he was asked if he's OK calling it out for what it is?
Now mind you, he's already spent quite a bit of time ITT, giving us his various opinions about the issue, while claiming it nevertheless doesn't effect him, yet when asked to express his own particular views on it he simply refused!
Another contradiction. He doesn't care about the issue, and of course has no opinion on it because it doesn't effect him, yet here he clearly states that he doesn't think whatever you call it, it's NOT killing an innocent baby!
How can anyone take him seriously on this issue? He's opposed to late term abortions but OK with them as long as they're done to save the mother's life. He admits that's less than 1% of all abortions, yet uses that very argument to support a woman's right to kill her unwanted baby in 98% of all the rest of abortion cases! He doesn't think that's what she's doing (killing an unwanted innocent baby) yet he can't explain what else it is she's doing if she's not deciding to kill an innocent baby she simply doesn't want? How much more confused can one person be on one issue he doesn't care anything about?
He won't explain himself to correct his obviously contradictory statements, but he nevertheless "doesn't care" about it so he predicts it's a sure fire losing issue for Trump and Republicans? That all by itself minus all the other double speak is simply another giant self-admitted contradiction!
@NYC_Eer
That's it...I've had it with you atl! 'Ya know you must really enjoy watching me do this because you're always pointing out how I run off from these threads after you start questioning my incoherence in them. Bye man!
I thought you'd eventually get tired of running off from your own two faced statements all the time, but apparently the more you make them & then are asked to explain yourself, the more all you offer us is this! 😏 He's pretty good at it too don't 'ya'll think?
That's fine, it'll be here 24/7 365 for anyone who wants to see for themselves how all over the map you are on this:
- you don't care about it because it doesn't effect you
- however you're convinced it's a "losing issue" for Republicans
- you don't agree with late term abortions
- however you don't know where that line should be drawn unless it's to protect the Mother's health
- you know that's less than 1% of all abortions
- yet you can't define when we should restrict 98% of all the rest of them
- you think people of Faith are "forcing" the issue into the political crossfire
- however you call them "Christ-crazy" (or whatever derogatory term you used)
- you don't believe innocent babies slaughtered in the womb before birth is murder
- yet you refuse to define exactly what is happening to them as they're being dismembered
If what I've pointed out about your own posts in this thread upset you, I care as much about that as YOU do for this whole issue. That's why I can't understand why you're even in this thread displaying your duplicitous ignorance.
@NYC_Eer
OK atl, you've made your point... I can take a hint when it's offered
You should just keep on steppin' @NYC_Eer ...no one wants to read your "drivel "either. 😏
Last edited:
Then how do you know it's "drivel" if you didn't read it?
Matter of fact, how do you even respond to a post you didn't read? 🤔
@NYC_Eer
Drivel: (from Webster's New World dictionary):
nonsense or boring and unnecessary information:
Ex: You don't believe the drivel you read on the internet, do you?
You're talking drivel as usual!
It's essentially impossible for one to characterize "drivel" without either reading or speaking it.
Yeah, neither did @NYC_Eer
Drivel: (from Webster's New World dictionary):
nonsense or boring and unnecessary information:
Ex: You don't believe the drivel you read on the internet, do you?
You're talking drivel as usual!
It's essentially impossible for one to characterize "drivel" without either reading or speaking it.
Yeah, neither did @NYC_Eer
After they are done with the Jews.
The agnostic are next if you don't get in line with the Communist.
The agnostic are next if you don't get in line with the Communist.
ABC wants you to buy more CCP green energy supplies.
www.google.com
AOC’s Chief of Staff Admits the Green New Deal Is Not about Climate Change
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted recently that the true motivation behind introducing the Green New Deal is to overhaul the “entire economy.”Chakrabarti said that addressing climate change was not Ocasio-Cortez's top priority in proposing the...
AOC’s Chief of Staff Admits the Green New Deal Is Not about Climate Change
But Gunny the Branch Davidians were a cult. They were definitely weirdos led by a nutjob. But your missing the point. They think all of you regardless of specific religion are cult members and if you can't be infiltrated and convinced to support them. Then they must destroy you.
Folks we should all be celebrating...I don't think we'll be seeing anymore of @NYC_Eer around here ...see he doesn't read any of the "drivel" on this forum so we'll all be spared his uninformed sophistry from now on. (He won't see this post, because he doesn't care what we say about him or even reads it)
Anyone want to thank me for finally getting rid of his "drivel" on this forum?
You're Welcome!
Anyone want to thank me for finally getting rid of his "drivel" on this forum?
You're Welcome!
Last edited:
Call MAGA Nazis. Create Fake accounts and pretend Trump supporters are Nazis. Then actual Nazis show up and they are Democrats. Defend those Nazis.
This Isarel thing really seems to be short circuiting the New Democrat Party heads. They are calling for the death of Jews and America during these protest. This shouldn't be that hard.
www.foxnews.com
MEDIA
This Isarel thing really seems to be short circuiting the New Democrat Party heads. They are calling for the death of Jews and America during these protest. This shouldn't be that hard.
100 Harvard faculty cry foul at university's 'Combating Antisemitism' initiative
Over 100 faculty members at Harvard University have signed an open letter letter criticizing the school's recent "Combating Antisemitism" initiative.
MEDIA
100 Harvard faculty cry foul at university's 'Combating Antisemitism' initiative
Last edited:
Stroking out again I see.Folks we should all be celebrating...I don't think we'll be seeing anymore of @NYC_Eer around here ...see he doesn't read any of the "drivel" on this forum so we'll all be spared his uninformed sophistry from now on. (He won't see this post, because he doesn't care what we say about him or even reads it)
Anyone want to thank me for finally getting rid of his "drivel" on this forum?
You're Welcome!
You can't insult him...he doesn't read "drivel" on here...just scans it!
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
WVSPORTS.COM Frazier drafted by the Pittsburgh Steelers in second round- Latest: brandonjags8
-
