Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sydney Powell, Jeffrey Clark, Kenneth Chesebro, and a political consultant associated with the fraudulent elector scheme.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he (Trump) set out to overthrow the election, why was there a need to shut down those vote counts late in the race where he was already clearly ahead and comfortably cruising towards a solid electoral victory? Until or unless you can explain that which has never before happened in American electoral history (and is the entire basis of his complaint btw) your charge is pointless.Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sydney Powell, Jeffrey Clark, Kenneth Chesebro, and a political consultant associated with the fraudulent elector scheme.
So you guarantee 100%? Well your guarantee is nearly as good as Trump’s word.If he (Trump) set out to overthrow the election, why was there a need to shut down those vote counts late in the race where he was already clearly ahead and comfortably cruising towards a solid electoral victory? Until or unless you can explain that which has never before happened in American electoral history (and is the entire basis of his complaint btw) your charge is pointless.
I'll 100% guarantee both a Trump acquittal on these baseless charges and the hard cold fact that you cannot explain why those vote counts were all suddenly suspended while Trump was comfortably ahead and about to win that race outright.
At some point Gunny, you’re gonna finally see this isn’t Republicans vs Democrats. This is one party. Neither can work without the other. If I were wrong, they would be helping Trump. Like you, I will vote Trump.It's election interference. I'm still voting for Trump. Even if I have to write his name in. Why? Because Republican politicians are taking it like a bitch. So they don't deserve my vote until I see some real fighting back using the tactics the Democrats are.
You've already made my guarantee. You are 100% speechless refuting one word of it!So you guarantee 100%? Well you’re guarantee is nearly as good as Trump’s word.
At some point Gunny, you’re gonna finally see this isn’t Republicans vs Democrats. This is one party. Neither can work without the other. If I were wrong, they would be helping Trump. Like you, I will vote Trump.
Trump will never get an acquittal if the trial stays in D.C.. I'm 100% on that.So you guarantee 100%? Well you’re guarantee is nearly as good as Trump’s word.
That's the reason why he'll be acquitted! How can his prosecutors prove his thoughts were actually "criminal" simply because he questioned the results? Where's the statute on that?Trump has/had every right to think the election was stolen......in a normal world that's not a crime.
That's the reason why he'll be acquitted! How can his prosecutors prove his thoughts were actually "criminal" simply because he questioned the results? Where's the statute on that?
He will not be acquitted in D.C. . This judge is rotten to the core.That's the reason why he'll be acquitted! How can his prosecutors prove his thoughts were actually "criminal" simply because he questioned the results? Where's the statute on that?
That is exactly what they are doing.There's a reason they are using the unethical tactic of stacking a ridiculous amount of charges. Because they know they are making shit up and hoping a jury will just buy anything even if it's only one.
There's a reason they are using the unethical tactic of stacking a ridiculous amount of charges. Because they know they are making shit up and hoping a jury will just buy anything even if it's only one.
That is exactly what they are doing.
Overall tactic - bleed him dry
Specific tactic - get him found guilty in DC and/or ATL
A penniless Trump behind bars is the goal.
I won't be ok with voting for anyone who didn't fight back using their own tactics. I suggest the Republicans and the Opposition to them get busy or they will lose a lot in the upcoming election.
Who do you want to do specifically what?
House can impeach, Senate won't follow through.
Federal courts aren't going to work in Republican favor, SCOTUS will most likely sit out political cases.
State AG's are about the only hope I see right now.
Start impeachment on Garland and Biden anyways. Let's get politicians on record. State AG's get busy. Republican Party circle the wagons around Trump now because your favorite candidate is next. Start explaining to voters what's really going on instead of wasting time on candidates with 1 to 15 % while hoping the Democrats plan works.
Stop rooting for the Democrats and Establishments election interference should be the easiest one.
It's not rooting for. It's understanding the battlefield.
You and DeSantis advisors obviously don't understand it. He would doing much better if he took a much stronger position in defending Trump while blasting Garland and Biden.
That’s what the south tried in 1861.RDS said he's tearing down the bureaucracy when elected. He's not a carnival ringmaster like Trump, he doesn't give flamboyant speeches. That's about all you'll get from him, until he tears down the bureaucracy.
As for being a governor during this time period, there's not much for him to do. Maybe cut off cooperation with feds? Declare Florida a new country? What do you want?
There has to be a crime in order for him to be convicted. "Thinking" you lost an election is not a crime. That's exactly what they're charging him with. Good luck convincing a jury he has no right to challenge the results of an election he thinks was unfair. All he has to do is call Hillary in as a defense witness and have his attorneys ask her under oath if she thought Trump fairly won their race?He will not be acquitted in D.C. . This judge is rotten to the core.
Maybe then, finally, the 2020 election results can be investigated and a forensic audit of each vote can be analyzed. That’s all Trump and all of us have wanted from day 1.There has to be a crime in order for him to be convicted. "Thinking" you lost an election is not a crime. That's exactly what they're charging him with. Good luck convincing a jury he has no right to challenge the results of an election he thinks was unfair. All he has to do is call Hillary in as a defense witness and have his attorneys ask her under oath if she thought Trump fairly won their race?
Case dismissed.
Ironically that is the one advantage Trump's defense will have that he never got a chance to do....present his evidence for fraud. Most of the cases he wanted to prosecute were never heard...the evidence wasn't allowed to be presented before the cases were thrown out for (laughably) lack of evidence or "non status".Maybe then, finally, the 2020 election results can be investigated and a forensic audit of each vote can be analyzed. That’s all Trump and all of us have wanted from day 1.
That’s exactly what happened. Their strategy was the refusal to hear it. All these judges.Ironically that is the one advantage Trump's defense will have that he never got a chance to do....present his evidence for fraud. Most of the cases he wanted to prosecute were never heard...the evidence wasn't allowed to be presented before the cases were thrown out for (laughably) lack of evidence or "non status".
Now he gets to present a defense, and from what his attorneys are saying he will subpoena all relevant witnesses to make his case for fraud and we'll hear all of the evidence that's never been vetted or even presented! Maybe we'll finally get to find out what these mules were up to?
There has to be a crime in order for him to be convicted. "Thinking" you lost an election is not a crime. That's exactly what they're charging him with. Good luck convincing a jury he has no right to challenge the results of an election he thinks was unfair. All he has to do is call Hillary in as a defense witness and have his attorneys ask her under oath if she thought Trump fairly won their race?
Case dismissed.
So if he's "convicted" you're saying thoughts are now prosecutable crimes correct? What else would he be convicted of if he's found guilty except falsely believing he was robbed of an election?Have you not watched any of the J6 trial info? It's a DC jury, and the judge who let Imran Awan go.
Your post is a pipedream. I think Smith will ask for no bail tomorrow, and that's the last time we see Trump as a free man. Absolutely, Trump will be found guilty, and the first appeal will be denied. That first appeal will be after the presidential election, which he will lose. Trump better hope our elder conservative SCOTUS members don't retire/die.
You are forgetting that this case will be heard in D.C. . You may not know how things are up here.....I do.There has to be a crime in order for him to be convicted. "Thinking" you lost an election is not a crime. That's exactly what they're charging him with. Good luck convincing a jury he has no right to challenge the results of an election he thinks was unfair. All he has to do is call Hillary in as a defense witness and have his attorneys ask her under oath if she thought Trump fairly won their race?
Case dismissed.
That's exactly how I see it.....but Smith would be an absolute fool if he locks Trump up at this point.Have you not watched any of the J6 trial info? It's a DC jury, and the judge who let Imran Awan go.
Your post is a pipedream. I think Smith will ask for no bail tomorrow, and that's the last time we see Trump as a free man. Absolutely, Trump will be found guilty, and the first appeal will be denied. That first appeal will be after the presidential election, which he will lose. Trump better hope our elder conservative SCOTUS members don't retire/die.
No. However the Law is the Law and even though the Left is desperately trying to reconfigure what the Law is...we're still allowed free speech and thought in this country. They still have to prove whatever the Hell it is they're accusing Trump of in these fraudulent cases...and so far all they're accusing him of is wrong thinking about losing that '20 election. It won't fly.You are forgetting that this case will be heard in D.C. . You may not know how things are up here.....I do.
You think Trump will get a fair trial in Atlanta when that charade starts ?
So if he's "convicted" you're saying thoughts are now prosecutable crimes correct? What else would he be convicted of if he's found guilty except falsely believing he was robbed of an election?
Sedition?
Conspiracy?
Treason?
He wasn't even charged with any of that!
No. However the Law is the Law and even though the Left is desperately trying to reconfigure what the Law is...we're still allowed free speech and thought in this country. They still have to prove whatever the Hell it is they're accusing Trump of in these fraudulent cases...and so far all they're accusing him of is wrong thinking about losing that '20 election. It won't fly.