I know of at least one who will continue to insist it wasn't stolen no matter how much "evidence" is provided!
@Boomboom521
I will 100% guarantee this poster WILL NOT respond to any of this evidence, yet he will continue to carp there's "no evidence". He said the exact same (wrong) things on the FISA abuse/Russian collusion hoax, so why should he stop with this? 🤔
excerpt:
So for the skeptics think about this level of proof, the property of the state the crimes took place in demonstrating hundreds of thousands of felonies. No explanation needed the evidence exists and literally speaks for itself. What I am saying without reservation and with absolute science and evidence supporting it—using the evidence in the film from only a handful of regional locations from only some of the states in question—Biden clearly lost.
...more
And just to make sure that the possibility for false positives didn’t ping as evidence, True The Vote, raised the standard of proof—ten times—beyond what they would be required to prove in a court of law. In other words they voluntarily made proving the guilt ten times as hard as is necessary to prove the criminality. Ten times the standard, ten times harder to prove, ten times less likely to find that proof. Yet they found enough to prove Biden’s loss. Geo Tracking is as reliable as finger prints or DNA. The millions of minutes of footage comes from the state’s own cameras. The bar to prove was set impossibly high. And even still, the evidence has been found, and is able to be proven.
....
True The Vote has utilized the same technology by one of the leading investigators on the planet to prove—not a theory—but the facts of who did it but also how it was done.
Trust the Science
boomboom521: "You have no evidence"
*editor's note:
Want to know what other Leftists won't even bother to recognize this factual evidence? The minions in the propaganda Democrat/State controlled main stream news media. Not a word from them, except in ongoing attempts to discredit the authors. None of their efforts however will factually refute one fact the authors have presented.
Not one.
@Boomboom521
I will 100% guarantee this poster WILL NOT respond to any of this evidence, yet he will continue to carp there's "no evidence". He said the exact same (wrong) things on the FISA abuse/Russian collusion hoax, so why should he stop with this? 🤔
excerpt:
So for the skeptics think about this level of proof, the property of the state the crimes took place in demonstrating hundreds of thousands of felonies. No explanation needed the evidence exists and literally speaks for itself. What I am saying without reservation and with absolute science and evidence supporting it—using the evidence in the film from only a handful of regional locations from only some of the states in question—Biden clearly lost.
...more
And just to make sure that the possibility for false positives didn’t ping as evidence, True The Vote, raised the standard of proof—ten times—beyond what they would be required to prove in a court of law. In other words they voluntarily made proving the guilt ten times as hard as is necessary to prove the criminality. Ten times the standard, ten times harder to prove, ten times less likely to find that proof. Yet they found enough to prove Biden’s loss. Geo Tracking is as reliable as finger prints or DNA. The millions of minutes of footage comes from the state’s own cameras. The bar to prove was set impossibly high. And even still, the evidence has been found, and is able to be proven.
....
True The Vote has utilized the same technology by one of the leading investigators on the planet to prove—not a theory—but the facts of who did it but also how it was done.
Trust the Science
boomboom521: "You have no evidence"
Oh the irony of this particular post is just too delicious for mere words!
*editor's note:
Want to know what other Leftists won't even bother to recognize this factual evidence? The minions in the propaganda Democrat/State controlled main stream news media. Not a word from them, except in ongoing attempts to discredit the authors. None of their efforts however will factually refute one fact the authors have presented.
Not one.
