ADVERTISEMENT

The second amendment

Nope. Felons are not permitted, but they still break the laws and use them anyway.
Nobody said anything about felons. Was the Nashville shooter a felon prior to the shooting? I have no idea. The Virginia Beach shooter wasn't. Nor was the idiot 6 year old in Newport News, VA.

"Evil" doesn't equal felon.
 
Nobody said anything about felons. Was the Nashville shooter a felon prior to the shooting? "Evil" doesn't equal felon.

No, but she had mental issues, in which current laws should have prevented her from obtaining a firearm. Clearly, our current laws aren't being enforced. So how would a new law, taking my Constitutional right of owning an AR-15, make a difference?
 
Yes. But the people killing with guns are the evil people and in most cases it is already illegal for them to buy and own guns because they forfeit their rights when the previously committed crimes.

I think the ignored group is the mentally ill segment. We have a mental health crisis. Some are suggesting that some of this is a prescription drug problem. Probably worth research at least.
The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by sane people. They are just assholes. Mental illness is a deflection.
 
No, but she had mental issues, in which current laws should have prevented her from obtaining a firearm. Clearly, our current laws aren't being enforced. So how would a new law, taking my Constitutional right of owning an AR-15, make a difference?
What mental illness did she have? I don't know shit about him/her other than the tranny nonsense, which isn't a mental illness that would preclude firearm ownership.
 
..
What mental illness did she have? I don't know shit about him/her other than the tranny nonsense, which isn't a mental illness that would preclude firearm ownership.

It's a mental illness. If you don't understand that then you are completely lost.
 
The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by sane people. They are just assholes. Mental illness is a deflection.
I don't think it is a deflection. I think you are correct that most violent crimes are committed by sane people and also there are serious issue with mental health. In most of the school shootings the bad actors have had mental issues. If you expand it to all violent crimes the issue shifts to repeat offenders. Different solutions.
 
I don't think it is a deflection. I think you are correct that most violent crimes are committed by sane people and also there are serious issue with mental health. In most of the school shootings the bad actors have had mental issues. If you expand it to all violent crimes the issue shifts to repeat offenders. Different solutions.

There's also people on the internet spinning them up. Preying on the mentally ill.
 
I don't think it is a deflection. I think you are correct that most violent crimes are committed by sane people and also there are serious issue with mental health. In most of the school shootings the bad actors have had mental issues. If you expand it to all violent crimes the issue shifts to repeat offenders. Different solutions.
In today's world everyone has a mental illness because we just change the definitions to suit our needs. Ever notice how many kids have ADHD today compared to 25 years ago? Or how the number of anxiety diagnoses spike in the state immediately following medical marijuana? What do you think happens in Virginia with the number of anxiety cases in Virginia when weed is legal next year?

People with mental issues still have their second amendment rights. It just depends on the type of mental issue that triggers the denial of rights. I don't know what mental illnesses any of the school shooters had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
"Non-evil" people don't have that right either.

"Evil" people have the right to amass their arsenal.
Again "semantics". You are Evil if you kill innocent people. You also happen to be ignorant if you do not think slaughtering innocent people is Evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
Again "semantics". You are Evil if you kill innocent people. You also happen to be ignorant if you do not think slaughtering innocent people is Evil.
Just depends on the definition of evil. But Evil people, however you want to define it, have the same second amendment rights you do. Labelling them changes nothing.
 
If you want to call trannyism a mental illness, fine with me. But that isn't the type of mental illness that would preclude gun ownership.

Trannys have the same second amendment rights you do.

If they belong to an organization that's declared war on Christian Children?
 
I'm exactly the type to defend your rear end. You're welcome.


Well she's got that all correct. Probably why they attach her as conspiracy theorist. I don't follow her but it might be a good time to go back and look at what was a conspiracy and not a theroy of her reporting. Nobody is going to get everything right but labeling people conspiracy theroy nut jobs is the oldest trick in the book to discredit them as a whole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelEer
If they belong to an organization that's declared war on Christian Children?
Is that prohibition spelled out in the Constitution? Like it or not, the tranny was exercising her second amendment rights when she stockpiled her arsenal.
 
Is that prohibition spelled out in the Constitution? Like it or not, the tranny was exercising her second amendment rights when she stockpiled her arsenal.
Reading through this thread and coming across your comments is laughable. No understanding of mental illness whatsoever.
 
Reading through this thread and coming across your comments is laughable. No understanding of mental illness whatsoever.
Or what constitutes "evil"? A stipulation of it being the random slaughter of innocent people apparently isn't sufficient. :rolleyes:
 
Is that prohibition spelled out in the Constitution? Like it or not, the tranny was exercising her second amendment rights when she stockpiled her arsenal.

Because your tribe leaders wound her and turned her loose. Showing they don't actually care about their useful idiots and just the result.
 
Or what constitutes "evil"? A stipulation of it being the random slaughter of innocent people apparently isn't sufficient. :rolleyes:
At that point, he’s either mentally ill as well or he’s evil himself. Most experts also say a person has no self awareness they are mentally ill. To him, he likely thinks he’s fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
At that point, he’s either mentally ill as well or he’s evil himself. Most experts also say a person has no self awareness they are mentally ill. To him, he likely thinks he’s fine.
Depends on how you define "fine"? ;)
 
At that point, he’s either mentally ill as well or he’s evil himself. Most experts also say a person has no self awareness they are mentally ill. To him, he likely thinks he’s fine.

Ukraine was tossing Guns out to civilians not to long ago. Anyone willing to give their 2A rights in today's world isn't sane or has an agenda that doesn't include saving lives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePunish-EER
Reading through this thread and coming across your comments is laughable. No understanding of mental illness whatsoever.
Then maybe you can tell me the mental illness that tranny suffers from and why that illness would preclude it from having 2nd amendment rights.

I expect we will see an answer to the alleged crime trump committed before this can be answered.
 
Then maybe you can tell me the mental illness that tranny suffers from and why that illness would preclude it from having 2nd amendment rights.

I expect we will see an answer to the alleged crime trump committed before this can be answered.

Do you agree her complete manifesto should be released?
 
Because your tribe leaders wound her and turned her loose. Showing they don't actually care about their useful idiots and just the result.
I’m sure in your head that made sense and was a witty and responsive retort.

you are getting dumber with every post.
 
I’m sure in your head that made sense and was a witty and responsive retort.

you are getting dumber with every post.

It's how it works. You pretending otherwise doesn't change that fact.
 
Then maybe you can tell me the mental illness that tranny suffers from and why that illness would preclude it from having 2nd amendment rights.

I expect we will see an answer to the alleged crime trump committed before this can be answered.
A man wishing to remove his dick and make believe he’s a woman is normal? That’s a sane individual? If you chose to be a bird and jumped off a skyscraper wishing to fly, would that be sane? The fact this is a debate shows me you’re not sane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
At that point, he’s either mentally ill as well or he’s evil himself. Most experts also say a person has no self awareness they are mentally ill. To him, he likely thinks he’s fine.
Why can’t I be evil and mentally ill?

don’t sell your theory short.
 
A man wishing to remove his dick and make believe he’s a woman is normal? That’s a sane individual? If you chose to be a bird and jumped off a skyscraper wishing to fly, would that be sane? The fact this is a debate shows me you’re not sane.
abnormal and mental illness are not synonymous.

It is amazing that someone who apparently is well versed in mental illnesses can’t even identify one.
 
Do you agree her complete manifesto should be released?
A man wishing to remove his dick and make believe he’s a woman is normal? That’s a sane individual? If you chose to be a bird and jumped off a skyscraper wishing to fly, would that be sane? The fact this is a debate shows me you’re not sane.


They don't want the complete manifesto released. It's going to show mental illness and evil toward Christians. They will fight it from happening.
 
A man wishing to remove his dick and make believe he’s a woman is normal? That’s a sane individual? If you chose to be a bird and jumped off a skyscraper wishing to fly, would that be sane? The fact this is a debate shows me you’re not sane.

To emphasize your point.


 
Do you agree her complete manifesto should be released?
I don’t know. it would depend on the contents. It should absolutely be released unless it could legitimately influence others to act.
 
I don’t know. it would depend on the contents. It should absolutely be released unless it could legitimately influence others to act.

Shewww. Of course. How about we just release the truth. Your tribe is going to do crazy either way. No reason to cancel the 1st Amendment too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelEer
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT