Pure bullshit......show me ONE school in the entire country that does not accept transgenders,fag*gots and lesbians.
What does the manifesto have to do with releasing the truth? I am not sure what tribe I am a part of but I hope it offers good benefits.Shewww. Of course. How about we just release the truth. Your tribe is going to do crazy either way. No reason to cancel the 1st Amendment too.
What does the manifesto have to do with releasing the truth? I am not sure what tribe I am a part of but I hope it offers good benefits.
Try labelling less and thinking more. It will help immensely.
Pure bullshit......show me ONE school in the entire country that does not accept transgenders,fag*gots and lesbians.
What mental illness did she have? I don't know shit about him/her other than the tranny nonsense, which isn't a mental illness that would preclude firearm ownership.
I completely agree.
Nope. When the same tool is repeatedly used in crimes across the country, there is a problem. When our law enforcement officials are outgunned on the streets, there is a problem.
When corvettes are used for nefarious purposes as frequently as firearms, that discussion will be had but I am not holding my breath. There is a reason firearms, not corvettes, are the weapon of choice for criminals. Using a firearm is so easy a 6 year old can do it. Literally.
A couple of posts below this one you wrote about logic, and not understanding this point of view. That is where your arguments are failing - logically.
Let's look at your statement above. Disregarding the statement about our LEOs being outgunned - that's just hyperbole - but the statement about the "same tool" should be discussed logically.
A car is a tool. We can agree with that. Car accidents kill far more people than guns do. We can agree with that also. The analogy regarding the Corvette/Chevette is spot on. Both of these are tools, just like guns. The Corvette is an AR, the Chevette is a single shot.
Both, like any tool, have a purpose - to get from Point A to Point B. The same purpose. Most people use them safely. But, there will always be those who don't. A person so determined can drive unsafely in both. Both are capable of great harm if done so. Statistics back this up - most "accidents" are caused by unsafe speeds or intoxication of some kind.
But no one wants to ban cars. Nobody wants to ban just certain cars. No, everyone agrees it was the idiot driving that was to blame. We both agreed that people are responsible for their actions. Using logic, the same beliefs should apply to guns also, right?
The problem occurs when people look at the issue emotionally rather than logically.
Many of the things you have written I agree with. With some, they will always focus on the how - the gun itself. To those on the right, they tend to focus on the who - and call them mental. Neither address the real problem - the why. Without fixing the motivation, the other two are just window dressing and parlor games.
abnormal does not equal mental illness. I love these strawman arguments.Sure...Looking down there, seeing a vagina thinking a dick should have been there instead, is perfectly normal. 🙄
There's nothing abnormal about that, is there?
Those aren't my words. Those were the words of a Norfolk Police officer spoken to the Prosecutor and me at a crime scene. Stop talking about things you don't know anything about.Let's look at your statement above. Disregarding the statement about our LEOs being outgunned - that's just hyperbole - but the statement about the "same tool" should be discussed logically.
When Corvettes are responsible for hundreds of mass murder murders annually, we can talk about banning them too. That analogy is plain dumb.A car is a tool. We can agree with that. Car accidents kill far more people than guns do. We can agree with that also. The analogy regarding the Corvette/Chevette is spot on. Both of these are tools, just like guns. The Corvette is an AR, the Chevette is a single shot.
Both, like any tool, have a purpose - to get from Point A to Point B. The same purpose. Most people use them safely. But, there will always be those who don't. A person so determined can drive unsafely in both. Both are capable of great harm if done so. Statistics back this up - most "accidents" are caused by unsafe speeds or intoxication of some kind.
But no one wants to ban cars. Nobody wants to ban just certain cars. No, everyone agrees it was the idiot driving that was to blame. We both agreed that people are responsible for their actions. Using logic, the same beliefs should apply to guns also, right?
abnormal does not equal mental illness. I love these strawman arguments.
She had no mental condition which would justify stripping her of her 2nd Amendment rights. I would think pro-Second Amendment nuts would support her right.
YoU aRe DeFeNdInG hEr!Stop defending the terrorist.
YoU aRe DeFeNdInG hEr!
Drrrppp.
Every time I think you can't get any dumber, you manage to surprise me. Good job!
Actually before this movement to normalize this current identity crisis, these folks would indeed be labeled as gender dysmorphic…a classified mental illness.abnormal does not equal mental illness. I love these strawman arguments.
She had no mental condition which would justify stripping her of her 2nd Amendment rights. I would think pro-Second Amendment nuts would support her right.
Would gender dysmorphic have caused an individual to lose their Constitutional rights?Actually before this movement to normalize this current identity crisis, these folks would indeed be labeled as gender dysmorphic…a classified mental illness.
Just wait until the left pushes to normalize adults having sex with minors.
Yeah! I'm a communist. And I'm mad.Commie terrorist sympathizer sounds super mad. Cry harder dumbass.
Probably not before the gender dysmorphic killer went on a rampage. But seeing how 4-5 of the last mass shootings were gender dysmorphic, maybe they shouldn’t be allowed to have gunsWould gender dysmorphic have caused an individual to lose their Constitutional rights?
Someone can have ADHD or dislexia and still own a gun, right?
Yeah! I'm a communist. And I'm mad.
All you need to do is call me a Nazi and you will have completed the trifecta of internet arguments.
Maybe it is not just transgenders....Probably not before the gender dysmorphic killer went on a rampage. But seeing how 4-5 of the last mass shootings were gender dysmorphic, maybe they shouldn’t be allowed to have guns
Now I voted for Biden.I tell you what. I'll make a compromise with you. If you can convince the vegetables you vvoted for to secure the border, wipe out the cartels, round up all the gang members, round up the Socialists insurrectionist, start showing equal justice, calm down the talks of WW3. Do all that.
Then I would support your tribe collecting all the AK-47's you're capable of globally.
Abnormal is a kid not reaching milestone’s in development or you wanting to live with your mommy as an adult. Mental illness is you wanting your dick removed and someone putting theirs in your ass.abnormal does not equal mental illness. I love these strawman arguments.
She had no mental condition which would justify stripping her of her 2nd Amendment rights. I would think pro-Second Amendment nuts would support her right.
Now I voted for Biden.
This keeps getting better! LOL!
Abnormal is a kid not reaching milestone’s in development or you wanting to live with your mommy as an adult. Mental illness is you wanting your dick removed and someone putting theirs in your ass.
First, let's take the fallacy of your first argument. It's the fallacy of generalization where one takes the remarks of ONE person and generalizes it to the whole. Unless the NPD is still carrying .38 revolvers, which I doubt highly, I think what you "heard" was an officer talking about being under gunned when arriving on a scene with only a sidearm. I have been to far more crime scenes than you, talked to far more prosecutors and police officers than you, and know far more about this than you. Enough to know that what you say, or repeat rather, is overgeneralized.Those aren't my words. Those were the words of a Norfolk Police officer spoken to the Prosecutor and me at a crime scene. Stop talking about things you don't know anything about.
When Corvettes are responsible for hundreds of mass murder murders annually, we can talk about banning them too. That analogy is plain dumb.
You were saying something about logic?
Thought your tribe wanted enhanced background checks? I’d say these gender dysmorphic people need to be looked at.Maybe it is not just transgenders....
There have been plenty of mass shootings by all types of people, the left, the right, religious people too. Should anyone who goes to church be prohibited from their Second Amendment rights?
Look, that tranny wierdo has the same second amendment rights you do. I know it sucks, but it is what it is. Lebelling every one of the hundred or so mass shooters a year hasn't worked out so well has it?
Just man up and say Fvck those christian-schooled kids. Your second amendment right is more important.
Your analogy was perfect. Anyone who can't see it isn't trying, or is ontologically deluded.First, let's take the fallacy of your first argument. It's the fallacy of generalization where one takes the remarks of ONE person and generalizes it to the whole. Unless the NPD is still carrying .38 revolvers, which I doubt highly, I think what you "heard" was an officer talking about being under gunned when arriving on a scene with only a sidearm. I have been to far more crime scenes than you, talked to far more prosecutors and police officers than you, and know far more about this than you. Enough to know that what you say, or repeat rather, is overgeneralized.
Second, you again fail to understand logic. When explained cogently and with analogy, it simply goes over your head so to speak. Your arguments fail because when shown evidence, strongly as most people and I have here, you can't understand it or simply try to ignore it while simultaneously attributing it to something that doesn't make sense or constantly changes, i.e. your emotions.
If you need, I can simplify this down if you can't understand?
The problem for him was his PREMISE wasn't logical. That's why he can't logically argue back - the whole foundation for his belief was weak and crumbles like a house of cards when even slightly attacked. His only comebacks are to create more fallacies in an attempt to cover the ones he's already committed to.Your analogy was perfect. Anyone who can't see it isn't trying, or is ontologically deluded.
Nailed it.The problem for him was his PREMISE wasn't logical. That's why he can't logically argue back - the whole foundation for his belief was weak and crumbles like a house of cards when even slightly attacked. His only comebacks are to create more fallacies in an attempt to cover the ones he's already committed to.
When Corvettes are responsible for hundreds of mass murder murders annually, we can talk about banning them too.