Fvckers should just admit your ok with whatever as long as the person wears your jersey....jeez.
Stormy Daniels’ lawyer alleges Trump paid off ‘three additional women’ after affairs
- Thread starter moe
- Start date
Your "moral fabric" argument is nonsensical. It's gone, and it's not coming back. I never thought he was a Christian. Two Corinthians pretty much sold me on that.
I'm ok with it because the alternative was a witch from the depths of Hell.
Fify You do realize that some of these separated children will never see their parents again, right? They're going to start putting them in foster homes...welcome to your new family.#nofamilyvalues
Because the parents abandoned them? Or they were orphans to begin with being used as border crossing insurance? You realize you have no leg to stand on?
Trump kidnapped the kids and deported the parents. He made orphans out of the kids. Above all other things, this is what this admin should be remembered for. Congrats.
And that right there.....is why I look at most of you Christians as FOS. You stand by principles only when convenient, Blah Blah Blah. Act whatever way you want, then pray to save your own ass for the reckoning.
To tell yourself that money isn’t more important to you than the will of your God is nothing but a fvcking lie. No matter how you chose to manipulate it
I think there a couple of immutable Truths jpoppa that no matter what your opinion of things will never change.
We are unique. No one is copied. We are Free. No one controls our thoughts or wishes. With our uniqueness and Freedom comes personal responsibility. We are responsible both for our thoughts and what we do (our actions).
People not bound by personal responsibility or an obligation to take care of their behavior guided by their thoughts are apt to do anything to anyone. So what binds your behavior, morally? What are you responsible for or to whom?
This is the great debate we're having now as a society and we lack consensus on just what our standards should be, but Free people cannot operate without personal responsibility and that MUST be bound by some sense of duty, obligation, m-o-r-a-l-i-t-y even to protect both your own and the Nation's Freedom or the ability to live freely as you choose.
That will never change jpoppa! We will of course always argue about where that line should be drawn, but to remove it is to open yourself or the nation up to the tyranny of someone either forcing you to do that which is against your free will, or having that freedom taken away from you because you weren't vigilant enough protecting it for yourself by being personally responsible for it.
You answered the wrong question. Yes, I want more of my money that the government takes from me. I know I am better at spending it to help others than they are. And you can kindly piss off with your judgmental attitude.
It’s always funny when the judgey fvckers complain about being judged when they realize they don’t live by the standard they set for others.
You voted for a man that cheats on his three wives with pornstars and playmates, pays them off to not let it get out, then lies aabout all of it......and you did it so your team wins and you get more money.
No big deal. I voted for a person I don’t trust because I didn’t trust the other person more, and I thought it would be good for women. I’m no better. At least I admit it.
Christians live by their own principles and do not require anyone else to follow them. Yes, we do encourage living under the constraints of morals dictated by Almighty God through his Holy Word, but Christians know nor do they expect everyone will follow along just because they say so!
Christians however stand in the gap, pointing out that which is Evil because we know it to be such and see it as such, and crying out for righteousness because we know that works better than immorality. Christians often get accused of "forcing" their values onto others, but the Truth is everyone gets to freely decide what values they will live under but they often times refuse to accept the consequences of their choices, or blame others for them.
Christians are fine with whatever life one chooses to live, fully aware that not everyone is nor can be perfect. They (Christians) sure aren't! But then they get accused or blamed for the terrible consequences of immoral behavior, or someone's poor choices, as if they didn't "force" or require their chosen way of life onto everyone else more efficiently!
So really they (Christians) can't win! We get blamed for "forcing" our morality into an immoral world that chooses to be immoral. Or we get blamed for not requiring everyone else live up to our standards instead of the very standards they simply and freely chose for themselves!
Nice how well Christians are set up to be the fall guys no matter which world the rest of us choose to live in huh?kay:
Christians however stand in the gap, pointing out that which is Evil because we know it to be such and see it as such, and crying out for righteousness because we know that works better than immorality. Christians often get accused of "forcing" their values onto others, but the Truth is everyone gets to freely decide what values they will live under but they often times refuse to accept the consequences of their choices, or blame others for them.
Christians are fine with whatever life one chooses to live, fully aware that not everyone is nor can be perfect. They (Christians) sure aren't! But then they get accused or blamed for the terrible consequences of immoral behavior, or someone's poor choices, as if they didn't "force" or require their chosen way of life onto everyone else more efficiently!
So really they (Christians) can't win! We get blamed for "forcing" our morality into an immoral world that chooses to be immoral. Or we get blamed for not requiring everyone else live up to our standards instead of the very standards they simply and freely chose for themselves!
Nice how well Christians are set up to be the fall guys no matter which world the rest of us choose to live in huh?
kay:
Last edited:
2020 I am voting Trump, and you can kindly f' off with your piss off.
Not at all. Former Congresswoman Holtzman resigned from the Homeland Security Advisory Council last week over it.
Trump Administration And Family Reunifications
Hundreds of migrant families will likely not be reunited by today's court-appointed deadline. NPR's Noel King speaks to former congresswoman and co-author of the Refugee Act Elizabeth Holtzman.
NOEL KING, HOST:
Today's the deadline for the Trump administration to reunite migrant children who were separated from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border. A court filing from earlier this week, though, says hundreds of migrant parents cannot be reunited with their kids because they are already out of the country, either because they were deported or decided to leave voluntarily.
Elizabeth Holtzman is with me now. She's a former Democratic congresswoman, and
she co-authored the Refugee Act. That's the law that sets guidelines for how migrants can enter the country as refugees. Ms. Holtzman resigned from the Homeland Security Advisory Council last week over concerns about the administration's zero-tolerance policy. Good morning, Ms. Holtzman.
ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN: Good morning.
KING: As part of your resignation, you wrote a very strongly worded letter to the Department of Homeland Security secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen. It has gotten a lot of attention. And I want to read part of it now. You write, quote, "under your administration and that of Donald Trump's, DHS has been transformed into an agency that is making war on immigrants and refugees." That's very strong language. Can you tell me, what did you mean by that?
HOLTZMAN: I mean exactly what I said. You mention that I was the co-author of the Refugee Act of 1980. That was a bill, a law, that was not controversial when it was passed. And that was designed to say to the world, here we are, the United States. The Statue of Liberty is real for us. We welcome people, and we have a framework for doing that. And we welcome refugees. And what's happened, instead, is that we have a president of the United States who calls the immigration of people to this country an infestation and who has done everything he can to be cruel and horrific to immigrants, to refugees.
KING: The administration does seem to be in some ways either amending or backing off the zero-tolerance policy. A court has ordered them to reunite families. Secretary Nielsen says she's optimistic about meeting that deadline. Here she is on Fox.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN: We're on track to do it. We are working hand in glove with HHS. And it's certainly our intention to reunify all families that are suitable.
KING: OK. So she says we're on track to do it. Do you think that's correct?
HOLTZMAN: This is the secretary of Homeland Security who said we do not have a policy of separating parents from children, period. So she lied then, and she's lying now. You heard the last word of her statement, which was they're on track to reunite families where it's suitable. Well, is it suitable - it's not going to be suitable for them to reunite children with parents who've been deported, knowing that their children were here and regardless of that fact, regardless of the harm to the parents and regardless of the terrible harm to the children.
KING: Let me ask you, though, about repercussions. If the government does not meet this deadline to reunite these kids with their families, do they actually face any repercussions? Does anyone get in trouble?
HOLTZMAN: Well, the first repercussion has been the horror that most Americans feel at this administration, including the president and the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, for adopting this policy to begin with. The second repercussion is the horror that people all over the world feel at looking at the United States. We used to be a symbol of a country that expressed the most humane and finest values. And now we're a country that steals children, kidnaps children, takes them away from parents.
KING: So you're saying, in fact, that you think there may be political repercussions.
HOLTZMAN: Well, in addition to that, there could be other repercussions. Remember; the court can impose a contempt sentence on people in the government who do not comply with the court order. I hope he uses his policy to put anyone in jail, including the secretary, including anyone underneath her who has failed to comply with his order.
KING: That is former Democratic Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman. She resigned from the Homeland Security Advisory Council last week. Thank you.
HOLTZMAN: Thank you.
This blistering resignation letter from a White House adviser is a must-read.
https://www.upworthy.com/this-blist...ter-from-a-white-house-adviser-is-a-must-read
Because he making you money. Got it2020 I am voting Trump, and you can kindly f' off with your piss off.
Chistians voted for Trump fully aware of who they were voting for. They didn't make any excuses for his behavior, nor did they ignore it. They overlooked it.
They also balanced it against Trump's other positive influences. He's Pro Life, his opponent was Pro Death (not pro choice because she favored NO restrictions on abortion)
Trump was for limited government and greater personal freedoms. Trump was for protecting the sovereignty of the country, not open borders and unlimited illegal immigration. Trump supported our Troops, and returning respect to America's stand for Freedom around the World, not facilitating Islamic radicals' calls to destroy Israel.
There were other things, but those were the major things. Christians do not ignore Trump's past sexual immorality, but knowing not one to be perfect, they do not hold it against him especially in light of all of his other positive traits. It was in the past, and most Christians also know they had their own sexual peccadilloes they emerged better people from once they repented and accepted Christ.
They also balanced it against Trump's other positive influences. He's Pro Life, his opponent was Pro Death (not pro choice because she favored NO restrictions on abortion)
Trump was for limited government and greater personal freedoms. Trump was for protecting the sovereignty of the country, not open borders and unlimited illegal immigration. Trump supported our Troops, and returning respect to America's stand for Freedom around the World, not facilitating Islamic radicals' calls to destroy Israel.
There were other things, but those were the major things. Christians do not ignore Trump's past sexual immorality, but knowing not one to be perfect, they do not hold it against him especially in light of all of his other positive traits. It was in the past, and most Christians also know they had their own sexual peccadilloes they emerged better people from once they repented and accepted Christ.
He is making everybody money and you should be happy about that since the last admin wanted us to e ashamed of being Americans.
Christians only judge non Christians and abortion is the only act someone can commit that goes against the will of God.....got it
Money is about the middle of my fvcking list, and I’m ashamed of some things this nation has done....sure.....more proud, but sure there’s some shame there.
Sure, I'm ashamed of slavery, water fountains for blacks only etc. I'm also ashamed that we have made being on welfare acceptable. America tries to do great things. Alas, we are governed by humans who are fallible.
I love tears, and unicorns they let me know I’m alive.
I will say you’re a good thinker THE, and I have no doubt you love this nation. But whateva, you’re too good for me anyway
I’m ashamed of some of the failures we’ve made abroad as well. Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, El Salvador, we’ve done some serious jacking up of democracy in places. We’ve also done many many great things for democracy as well though.
It's always rich when I hear the posturing by dems about russia meddling, they've been doing it since the 50's, and all the meddling we've done. Hell, how many on here know about Obama spending money to be Netanyhu defeated? That's much worse than what the russians did.
Loving my family. Being connected to nature. Doing the right thing by those I come across. Being informed. My health. My community. Cheese. Unicorns.
The Left has no credibility on this argument about folks making money Airport.
A) none of them gave back their tax cuts, or plan to give back their 401K gains.
B) none of them send in any extra on their tax due bills.
Furthermore, Elizabeth Warren and Nancy "dumbass" complaining that the Trump tax cuts are simply "crumbs" don't offer to cut taxes any further...oh no...those two Female Vampire bloodsuckers want the crumbs back!
It’s bad when I think that a candidate (for President at that) was involved in the meddeling. Maybe he wasn’t, I want to be sure.
If those are crumbs, why don't they propose something more substantial in the form of tax reduction? That's a question that a real reporter should ask!
I'm ashamed that more Blacks don't realize the tremendous sacrifices made for them or the tremendous opportunities that exist in this country that don't exist anywhere else.
I can't stand people who blame America or complain about America yet choose to stay here and live here. If it's so bad, why don't you leave? Who's forcing you to stay here and endure all you see so wrong here? Go someplace else you think is better for you!
Lots of similar articles out there.
Government: 463 migrant parents may have been deported without their children
The Trump administration said in a court filing Monday that 463 parents of migrant children are no longer present in the United States, indicating that the number of mothers and fathers potentially deported without their children during the “zero tolerance” border crackdown could be far larger than previously acknowledged.
The progress report to U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw cautioned the 463 cases are “under review,” meaning the filing was not a definitive tally of all migrant parents who have been deported while their children remain in U.S. government shelters.
Immigrant advocates say migrant parents were pressured into signing voluntary deportation forms out of desperation to be released from immigration detention once their sons and daughters were taken from them and sent to government shelters.
“We have concerns about misinformation given to these parents about their rights to fight deportation without their children,” said Kang. Locating them in Central America will be challenging and time-consuming, he said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...b522f8-8ed5-11e8-9b0d-749fb254bc3d_story.html
Let me be clearer: it’s bad when I think a candidate for President works with a foreign state to get elected.
You are a fool. Nobody worked with the Russians. Only a blind fool cannot see that the russians and Hilliary were up to their necks together.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Who, ultimately, is behind the implementation of the state-outline field- Latest: OregonMountie
-
-