Mueller? Flynn was interviewed and lied to the FBI before Mueller. I don't believe the FISA on Page had anything to do with Flynn.
Immediate actions the administration needs to take
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Yup, you're right. Brain fart there. That was McCabe/Strzok, not Mueller in the slightest. Which really begs the question, what led them to question him?
It was written by members of the intel committee. The reason they chose Gowdy to read the FISA warrant was because he was a federal prosecutor familiar with the process.
It was written by Nunes staffers, why is it the “Nunes memo”, Gowdy read the FISA....ONLY Gowdy knows if the memo is accurate or not.
Oh I certainly believe that foreign individuals were actively hacking our emails, I just want to know 1) WHO, 2) HOW.... especially the HOW. Unlike some, I take cybersecurity seriously... and I do happen to know a thing or two about it, and I think for the safety of our systems we need to know these answers.
I've tried to forward your concerns and question to the NSA, FBI, CIA, military intel, etc. So far nothing. I'll soldier on.
I don’t believe the memo lies....I think it leaves critical information out in order to make the FBI and DOJ look like they abused power and the FISA program. Maybe they did. I’m not convinced by the memo.
Just seems that Gowdy (who is publically saying the memo doesn’t undercut the Mueller investigation) should have been the one behind the outrage, if he was the one that read the FISA.
Meh. He said questions/concerns the memo raises need a closer look. At least that's what I saw on CBS Sunday.
If the government sits on known vulnerabilities, then I have a big problem with that.
The memo doesnt undercut the mueller investigation. Any information they have that was not gained from the dossier or and FISA warrant intel would still be valid.
I thought no if you believe the dossier was fake, and the only reason for the investigation, then why would a collusion point investigation against Trump be valid without other more substantial or verified evidence?
Not to mention that if one believes the deep state angle that the memo asserts, then how could there be ANY legitimate evidence (not fabricated) that indicates an investigation was warranted?
Ok, a lot of prognosticating too look back on in the future. I will go on record stating he will never be charged.
I guess the FBI waited 4 years to charge him for Mueller? Or was it maybe something else?
Last edited:
As you can see from the following...they have already started their games:
Schiff said Monday that Democrats want to make sure the White House "does not redact our memo for political purposes."
I hope they release everything that is pertinent to this whole mess. It's the only way we will ever know which "memo" is the real deal.
Yeah. When they find out the FISA warrant for him was part of his cover story as an UCE for the FBI. It would be funnier if Rosenstein didnt know about and used that against him unwittingly.
Is there possibly a new direct line?
Blumenthal/Clinton -> Shearer -> Steele -> FBI
Steele was fed BS from the Clinton campaign to feed to the FBI.
Blumenthal/Clinton -> Shearer -> Steele -> FBI
Steele was fed BS from the Clinton campaign to feed to the FBI.
I’ll be damned, you have it all figured out.
Better be careful to make sure Hillary doesn’t find out.
Trump is absolutely going to release it after the FBI and DOJ redact sources and methods.
