ADVERTISEMENT

Hahahahaha that debate, shewwww

DvlDog4WVU

All-American
Gold Member
Feb 2, 2008
45,839
39,097
668
It was so lopsided the talking points are still trying to be spun. The most gentlemanly ass whipping I’ve witnessed in a long time. Walz got parked on his ass early and never really recovered. Vance delivered arguably the best debate performance I’ve ever watched.

Why was it so effective? It’s hard to defend the indefensible. Every point and indictment was salient and accurate. The only thing he couldn’t really handle was January 6th, and why? Because you can’t defend the indefensible. That was such a gift to the Dems allowing the rubes to get out of line. Aside from that? He crushed it.
 
It was so lopsided the talking points are still trying to be spun. The most gentlemanly ass whipping I’ve witnessed in a long time. Walz got parked on his ass early and never really recovered. Vance delivered arguably the best debate performance I’ve ever watched.

Why was it so effective? It’s hard to defend the indefensible. Every point and indictment was salient and accurate. The only thing he couldn’t really handle was January 6th, and why? Because you can’t defend the indefensible. That was such a gift to the Dems allowing the rubes to get out of line. Aside from that? He crushed it.
I didn't watch it, but read this morning about the exchange between the two over the 2020 election. Do you think he should have given an answer to that question, or keep tap-dancing around it as he was instructed to do?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Riverguideer
It was so lopsided the talking points are still trying to be spun. The most gentlemanly ass whipping I’ve witnessed in a long time. Walz got parked on his ass early and never really recovered. Vance delivered arguably the best debate performance I’ve ever watched.

Why was it so effective? It’s hard to defend the indefensible. Every point and indictment was salient and accurate. The only thing he couldn’t really handle was January 6th, and why? Because you can’t defend the indefensible. That was such a gift to the Dems allowing the rubes to get out of line. Aside from that? He crushed it.

Vance is a great example of the American Dream. A great example of hard work and making himself better by taking advantage of opportunities that are out there. Also a great example of taking advantage of the GI Bill after 4 years of honorable service too. He's not someone I have to agree with on everything to respect. I'm very proud of him as a fellow Marine.

The left and establishment hating on him shows the hypocrites they are when they can't control you. Mostly it shows they only care about power and control and have absolutely no desire to fix anything. Today would be a good day for the MSM to just tip their hat and say outstanding job instead of trying to spin it. That Is if they don't want to continue losing viewers.

Vance is absolutely the best pick Trump could have made. Anyone who can't admit that now has sold out to the CCP belt to road intiative, WEF, Soros Open Society and Open Borders Agenda, or the NeoCons/Neo Liberals who love wars that drag on forever instead of winning quickly.
 
I didn't watch it, but read this morning about the exchange between the two over the 2020 election. Do you think he should have given an answer to that question, or keep tap-dancing around it as he was instructed to do?

I think those that complain about Trump complaining about 2020 are hypocrites. We all know there needs to be steps taken to make elections better. The Democrats never want to do those though.



 
I didn't watch it, but read this morning about the exchange between the two over the 2020 election. Do you think he should have given an answer to that question, or keep tap-dancing around it as he was instructed to do?
Vance did answer it. He said both Trump and himself still have real questions about the results. Fact is, he wasn’t involved and Pence was VP. What else could he say? Unless you’re mentally challenged, it hard to not consider there was election fraud in 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUALLEN
I didn't watch it, but read this morning about the exchange between the two over the 2020 election. Do you think he should have given an answer to that question, or keep tap-dancing around it as he was instructed to do?
The Donald must have learned to tap dance from Kommi-Kam since she has twisted her every statement made the last 3+ years. Walz had no answer for any question asked of him since Harris has no platform to stand on. Ask her a question and she immediately switches her blather to another subject because she doesn't know what she was asked..
 
Last edited:
Vance did answer it. He said both Trump and himself still have real questions about the results. Fact is, he wasn’t involved and Pence was VP. What else could he say? Unless you’re mentally challenged, it hard to not consider there was election fraud in 2020.
First, there's election fraud each year. Just look it up and you'll see as many Republicans doing it as Democrats.

Four years, hundreds of lawsuits, and still nothing that shows the 2020 results were because of fraud. Why not come out and say "yes, he lost, but we need to fix the fraud"?
 
First, there's election fraud each year. Just look it up and you'll see as many Republicans doing it as Democrats.

Four years, hundreds of lawsuits, and still nothing that shows the 2020 results were because of fraud. Why not come out and say "yes, he lost, but we need to fix the fraud"?
Just because judges refuse to hear it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. 10000 mules pinpointed a lot of questions concerning obtained video of election box activity regarding ballot stuffing at all hours of the day and night. Often by the same individuals. Many irregularities and state election laws broken. It’s just as easy to ask why you can’t just say it might’ve happened. Do you really believe Biden got more black votes than the first black president Obama? That alone speaks volumes
 
First, there's election fraud each year. Just look it up and you'll see as many Republicans doing it as Democrats.

Four years, hundreds of lawsuits, and still nothing that shows the 2020 results were because of fraud. Why not come out and say "yes, he lost, but we need to fix the fraud"?
Just to clear up an ongoing lie about Trump not conceding:

CNN Updated 10:58 PM EST, Thu January 7, 2021
President Donald Trump conceded publicly for the first time Thursday that he will not serve a second term, stopping short of congratulating President-elect Joe Biden but acknowledging a transfer of power is now underway.
“A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20,” Trump said in the video, which was taped at the White House. “My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power.”
 
It was so lopsided the talking points are still trying to be spun. The most gentlemanly ass whipping I’ve witnessed in a long time. Walz got parked on his ass early and never really recovered. Vance delivered arguably the best debate performance I’ve ever watched.

Why was it so effective? It’s hard to defend the indefensible. Every point and indictment was salient and accurate. The only thing he couldn’t really handle was January 6th, and why? Because you can’t defend the indefensible. That was such a gift to the Dems allowing the rubes to get out of line. Aside from that? He crushed it.
I learned Tim Walz has become friends with many school shooters. That's nice.
 
It was so lopsided the talking points are still trying to be spun. The most gentlemanly ass whipping I’ve witnessed in a long time. Walz got parked on his ass early and never really recovered. Vance delivered arguably the best debate performance I’ve ever watched.

Why was it so effective? It’s hard to defend the indefensible. Every point and indictment was salient and accurate. The only thing he couldn’t really handle was January 6th, and why? Because you can’t defend the indefensible. That was such a gift to the Dems allowing the rubes to get out of line. Aside from that? He crushed it.
Yes I would say the debates went like this.
Harris won hers and Vance won his. Vance is not going to be president unless someone get to be a better shot and takes care of Donny
 
Just to clear up an ongoing lie about Trump not conceding:

CNN Updated 10:58 PM EST, Thu January 7, 2021
President Donald Trump conceded publicly for the first time Thursday that he will not serve a second term, stopping short of congratulating President-elect Joe Biden but acknowledging a transfer of power is now underway.
“A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20,” Trump said in the video, which was taped at the White House. “My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power.”
It is actually weird how much effort the media focuses on requiring Trump to verbally concede the election. Like weird enough to fuel conspiracy theories
 
I didn't watch it, but read this morning about the exchange between the two over the 2020 election. Do you think he should have given an answer to that question, or keep tap-dancing around it as he was instructed to do?
The one thing I most needed to hear from anyone who thinks that election was totally legit is why were those vote counts shut down only in those swing States where Trump was well ahead late into the evening?

If I could hear even a half way credible explanation of why that happened and how it was that in every one of those States where Trump was ahead he ended up losing every single one, I'd be willing to concede he lost fair and square. Unfortunately none of the folks who claim he lost fair and square have been able to explain that!

Why not?

That has never happened before, I doubt it will ever happen again, and to this day it has NEVER been factually or adequately explained!

Jan 6th was nothing more than a request from obviously dubious voters to look into that vote count anomaly since it was so unusual as well as totally unprecedented. It speaks volumes in my mind that we've never been told why that happened or how most of those uncounted votes up to that point eventually went to creepy Joe Biden? He was about to lose and lose big before those specific vote counts were shut down.

What if they had hadn't been shut down? Why can't we get a satisfactory answer to that while the Left continues to insist Trump lost fair and square? 🤔

You can't prove that by me without factually explaining those curious vote count suspensions. Trump lost every single State where those vote counts were stopped. He was well ahead in every single one of 'em.

Fact.
 
Last edited:
The one thing I most needed to hear from anyone who thinks that election was totally legit is why were those vote counts shut down only in those swing States where Trump was well ahead late into the evening?

If I could hear even a half way credible explanation of why that happened and how it was that in every one of those States where Trump was ahead he ended up losing every single one where those counts were stopped, I'd be willing to concede he lost fair and square. Unfortunately none of the folks who claim he lost fair and square have been able to explain that!

Why not?

That has never happened before, I doubt it will ever happen again, and to this day it has NEVER been factually or adequately explained!

Jan 6th was nothing more than a request from obviously dubious voters to look into that vote count anomaly since it was so unusual as well as totally unprecedented. It speaks volumes in my mind that we've never been told why that happened or how most of those uncounted votes up to that point eventually went to creepy Joe Biden? He was about to lose and lose big before those specific vote counts were shut down.

What if they had hadn't been shut down? Why can't we get a satisfactory answer to that while the Left continues to insist Trump lost fair and square? 🤔

You can't prove that by me without factually explaining those curious vote count suspensions. Trump lost every single State where those vote counts were stopped. He was well ahead in every single one of 'em.

Fact.
The only thing I will agree with is, it hasn’t been proven. And that’s because nobody will allow it to be investigated. No judge will hear it. Kind of bizarre really. State Election laws broken and a shit load of irregularities and it’s not worth looking into? Video evidence of massive ballot stuffing by the same individuals all day and all night. And vote counts suspended and poll workers sent home for the night, but then unknown poll workers arriving at 2-3am and carrying suitcases of ballots from a van and resuming counts. Was that not suspicious? Why weren’t Republican poll watchers there? Why did it resume that night? Who were these people? What about that water break in Atlanta? Did anyone ever followup on that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
The only thing I will agree with is, it hasn’t been proven. And that’s because nobody will allow it to be investigated. No judge will hear it. Kind of bizarre really. State Election laws broken and a shit load of irregularities and it’s not worth looking into? Video evidence of massive ballot stuffing by the same individuals all day and all night. And vote counts suspended and poll workers sent home for the night, but then unknown poll workers arriving at 2-3am and carrying suitcases of ballots from a van and resuming counts. Was that not suspicious? Why weren’t Republican poll watchers there? Why did it resume that night? Who were these people? What about that water break in Atlanta? Did anyone ever followup on that?
The simple truth is, it’s impossible to validate. It would require a full canvas of everyone who voted and a signed affidavit that they indeed cast that vote. That is the only way possible to validate and certify.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
The only thing I will agree with is, it hasn’t been proven. And that’s because nobody will allow it to be investigated. No judge will hear it. Kind of bizarre really. State Election laws broken and a shit load of irregularities and it’s not worth looking into? Video evidence of massive ballot stuffing by the same individuals all day and all night. And vote counts suspended and poll workers sent home for the night, but then unknown poll workers arriving at 2-3am and carrying suitcases of ballots from a van and resuming counts. Was that not suspicious? Why weren’t Republican poll watchers there? Why did it resume that night? Who were these people? What about that water break in Atlanta? Did anyone ever follow up on that?
There was no water main break btw. No one has explained with a logical fact supported chronology of specific instances in each and every one of those states, why those specific vote counts were all suddenly suspended? We know two things that stood as fact then and still today stand as undisputed facts:

1) Trump was well ahead in each and every one of those so called "swing states" (had enough to win an electoral count victory as a matter of fact)

2) Once those suspended vote counts resumed, he lost each and every one of them! He didn't win a single State where those counts were suddenly suspended after running well ahead in ALL OF THEM

If creepy Joe Biden was closing in on Trump's heels and about to take the lead in those States, why'd they STOP counting? When UGA was making its dramatic 28 point comeback this past weekend on 'Bama they didn't stop playing to allow Georgia to catch up! 🙄

Scam. The Left knows it too, they've just been gloating ever since because no one's come out yet with the indisputable hard evidence to prove it. Part of the reason you explained @ThePunish-EER in your post. (all the evidence hasn't ever been heard) However that 'ol adage "if it looks like a Duck, & quacks like a Duck, it's probably a Duck" applies here.

It sounds like a scam, and sure looks like a scam, so in my mind at least it WAS a scam. A giant vote stealing scam! :mad:
 
Last edited:
Yes I would say the debates went like this.
Harris won hers and Vance won his. Vance is not going to be president unless someone get to be a better shot and takes care of Donny
"someone get to be a better shot"
Did you ever take English in school or did they just offer Ebonic classes ?
 
First, there's election fraud each year. Just look it up and you'll see as many Republicans doing it as Democrats.

Four years, hundreds of lawsuits, and still nothing that shows the 2020 results were because of fraud. Why not come out and say "yes, he lost, but we need to fix the fraud"?
Why do Democrats oppose voter I.D. & ballot signature verification requirements? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM OPPOSES IT! Wouldn't that fix a majority of the fraud? 🤔
 
Last edited:
there's election fraud each year. Just look it up and you'll see as many Republicans doing it as Democrats.
Well the convenient "everybody does it defense" does apply here because other board members have posted reams of video of Democrats calling Trump's '16 election "illegitimate" with many in fact even refusing to seat elected delegates from their States! The only difference in this case of the "everybody does it defense" is we spent over 40 million dollars and 3 years investigating the bogus charge of Trump's so called "collusion" with Russians to steal the '16 election, and we haven't even spent one dollar investigating the legitimate sworn affidavits and forensic evidence of computer vote tabulations being manipulated, or bogus ballots being double counted in '20!

So while the "everybody does it" defense certainly excuses the Left from their past fraud, investigating claims of it when they're not making the charge doesn't draw the same defense. 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
The simple truth is, it’s impossible to validate. It would require a full canvas of everyone who voted and a signed affidavit that they indeed cast that vote. That is the only way possible to validate and certify.
Then that should happen after every election. Why shouldn't we verify elections that affect everyone in the country?
 
Just because judges refuse to hear it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. 10000 mules pinpointed a lot of questions concerning obtained video of election box activity regarding ballot stuffing at all hours of the day and night. Often by the same individuals. Many irregularities and state election laws broken. It’s just as easy to ask why you can’t just say it might’ve happened. Do you really believe Biden got more black votes than the first black president Obama? That alone speaks volumes
Hey I resent that last remark....the Blacks who didn't vote for me, and voted for Trump instead really weren't Black!
iu

Guess all the rest of your so called "record" 81 million votes must have been fake then huh creepy Joe? 🤔

'Ya know something.... I really don't like you atl...for a Black guy you just flat out piss me off!
iu

Glad I get under creepy skin then creepy Joe....you won't have to worry about me much longer tho' Bro, 'cause your creepy old ass will be loooong gone in just a few more months!!!!! :joy:
 
Or, we go back to in-person voting with exception for military overseas and paper ballots that have been requested by the voter due to planned absence.
Exactly this! I'd even favor a poll test! If you can't name the three branches of Government, your Congressional legislative district and representative, and how a bill becomes law...you're too stupid be voting anyway!

Make 'em watch this if they can't explain that last question on their poll test! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
Why do Democrats oppose voter I.D. & ballot signature verification requirements? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM OPPOSES IT! Wouldn't that fix a majority of the fraud? 🤔
They think minorities are not capable of getting a ID .....
Yeah that's not racist at all ..
 
  • Angry
Reactions: atlkvb
I know if I was a black person them saying that would piss me plum off . They literally say blacks are not smart enough to get ID'S.
I don't know why more Black folks aren't pissed off at Dems even for the suggestion they're too stupid to obtain voter I.D's! Some are, but not nearly enough. Maybe the ones who aren't pissed off really are that stupid? They're still voting Democrat! :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
I don't know why more Black folks aren't pissed off at Dems even for the suggestion they're too stupid to obtain voter I.D's! Some are, but not nearly enough. Maybe the ones who aren't pissed off really are that stupid? They're still voting Democrat! :rolleyes:
Yeah guess you're right ...
 
Why do Democrats oppose voter I.D. & ballot signature verification requirements? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM OPPOSES IT! Wouldn't that fix a majority of the fraud? 🤔
1. Voter ID cards? No clue why anyone is against them.
2. Ballot signature verification......that's subjective because you know as well as I do that your signature does change throughout your years. Mine is not even close to what it was 5 years ago. How often would they verify? Every year? What do you do with people who cannot write (there are many that do not write cursive)?

I don't think either of those "fixes" anything. If people are going to cheat, they will find a way. Wouldn't be hard to fabricate Voter ID cards. Just give criminals time, they'll find a way. Are there fake driver's licenses?

I've always thought finger print scans would be a good idea, but I guess this technology would be 1) expensive and 2) not reasonable because it would require experts to analyze or rely on computers (which I don't like).
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT