ADVERTISEMENT

Cohen’s plea deal

Paying off a porn star regarding an affair has no personal benefit or even maybe a business benefit?

I’m struggling to see the point your attempting to make.

Are those mutually exclusive from benefiting the campaign?

No? Ok then.
 
I’m struggling to see the point your attempting to make.

Are those mutually exclusive from benefiting the campaign?

No? Ok then.
Yes they are and that will be the legal argument should it come to that.
 
Paying off a porn star regarding an affair has no personal benefit or even maybe a business benefit?
lol, right, who would care if it came out that you were banging porn stars and playboy bunnies right before an election, that'd probably helped Trump even more with the religious right crowd. Why pay them off if it has no bearing or benefit to anything? Ya all should have seen this coming a mile away, what do ya think the odds are that he has paid for an abortion or two?
 
Paying off a porn star regarding an affair has no personal benefit or even maybe a business benefit?
It has a personal benefit if you're wanting to be elected prez and that payment keeps the affair with the porn star out of the Fake News Media until after the election.
 
lol, right, who would care if it came out that you were banging porn stars and playboy bunnies right before an election, that'd probably helped Trump even more with the religious right crowd. Why pay them off if it has no bearing or benefit to anything? Ya all should have seen this coming a mile away, what do ya think the odds are that he has paid for an abortion or two?
I'm sure his wife would care if it ever came out. The religious crowd held their nose and voted for him...their vote wasn't about him, it was about HRC. Why would any man who was cheating pay off a mistress.

Doesn't matter - it's not changing 2016 and any thing that has happened since then [cheers]
 
lol, right, who would care if it came out that you were banging porn stars and playboy bunnies right before an election, that'd probably helped Trump even more with the religious right crowd. Why pay them off if it has no bearing or benefit to anything? Ya all should have seen this coming a mile away, what do ya think the odds are that he has paid for an abortion or two?
Trumps sexual habits had nothing to do with the reason I voted for him, I voted for Trump because he was running against more deplorable Hillary...
 
Sure it will. You’ll have to make all those posts telling us how much you don’t care.
Wow people on a message board posting things...how weird. Is that not how it works?
 
I'm sure his wife would care if it ever came out. The religious crowd held their nose and voted for him...their vote wasn't about him, it was about HRC. Why would any man who was cheating pay off a mistress.

Doesn't matter - it's not changing 2016 and any thing that has happened since then [cheers]
Lol, Clinton got a blowjob and ya'll wanted to impeach him, enjoy the 2016 win, it's gonna pay dividends for ya'll down the road, that demographic on display last night at his rally is growing by leaps and bounds. Are those two toasting smiley faces you and Dave?
 
Lol, Clinton got a blowjob and ya'll wanted to impeach him, enjoy the 2016 win, it's gonna pay dividends for ya'll down the road, that demographic on display last night at his rally is growing by leaps and bounds. Are those two toasting smiley faces you and Dave?
I think Clinton's impeachment was around his lying under oath, not the sexual abuse of an intern.

And the win in 2016 is no HRC in the WH and two SCOTUS picks.
 
If Trump has a habit of paying off women to keep silence, because of his public persona, then it's going to be a more difficult argument to make that in the Stormy daniels case, that it was his typical response and instead a direct result of the election.
 
If Trump has a habit of paying off women to keep silence, because of his public persona, then it's going to be a more difficult argument to make that in the Stormy daniels case, that it was his typical response and instead a direct result of the election.

You should call Giuliani and let him know.
 
If Trump has a habit of paying off women to keep silence, because of his public persona, then it's going to be a more difficult argument to make that in the Stormy daniels case, that it was his typical response and instead a direct result of the election.
What do you mean if? Good lord, it's like trying to discuss a football game with folks who don't agree there are nine innings, lol.
 
What do you mean if? Good lord, it's like trying to discuss a football game with folks who don't agree there are nine innings, lol.
Oh so you agree that Trump had a habit of paying of women to keep the silent due to his persona?
 
Oh so you agree that Trump had a habit of paying of women to keep the silent due to his persona?
Yeah, and I also agree that he has lied about it continually since it was first brought up, call Giuliani skippy, I think you fanboys on here may have a strategy that will save him yet! lol
 
Yeah, and I also agree that he has lied about it continually since it was first brought up, call Giuliani skippy, I think you fanboys on here may have a strategy that will save him yet! lol
So he paid off the women for personal reasons then...that's your story?
 
I’m struggling to see the point your attempting to make.

Are those mutually exclusive from benefiting the campaign?

No? Ok then.

CPWrong

DlObB8MVAAAyryd.jpg:large
 

Before we proceed, I just want to point out that we are having a debate on whether hush money paid to a porn star and to a tabloid to coverup affairs was done as a benefit to the person you voted for or for his campaign in general.

I just want to crystallize this point because i think it is very important. Because the same people trying to make this argument in support of trump clutch their pearls over the thought of a baker being forced to bake a cake for a gay couple. Just wanted to point that out. Sanctity of marriage and all of that.

Having said all that...if you believe for one second that this hush money payment made a week before the election in 2016 to cover up an affair that took place in 2006 had nothing to do with the campaign...then it is no ****ing wonder that you fall for the dumbest pizzagate-deepstate-nunes memos wingnut conspiracy fantasies that get shared like a dirty needle among the Qanonesticles in the middle of the night.

Putting the Ls in gullible.


As I said earlier...good luck with that defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
Before we proceed, I just want to point out that we are having a debate on whether hush money paid to a porn star and to a tabloid to coverup affairs was done as a benefit to the person you voted for or for his campaign in general.

I just want to crystallize this point because i think it is very important. Because the same people trying to make this argument in support of trump clutch their pearls over the thought of a baker being forced to bake a cake for a gay couple. Just wanted to point that out. Sanctity of marriage and all of that.

Having said all that...if you believe for one second that this hush money payment made a week before the election in 2016 to cover up an affair that took place in 2006 had nothing to do with the campaign...then it is no ****ing wonder that you fall for the dumbest pizzagate-deepstate-nunes memos wingnut conspiracy fantasies that get shared like a dirty needle among the Qanonesticles in the middle of the night.

Putting the Ls in gullible.


As I said earlier...good luck with that defense.

I'm not sure why anyone would turn away business. If I'm the baker, I'm making the cake - I'm in the business to make money not a statement.
 
If he gave the hamburger and coke to a woman to keep her silent during the campaign then yep. It’s really not a complex thing to understand.
It is apparently too complicated for you and many others to understand.
 
It has a personal benefit if you're wanting to be elected prez and that payment keeps the affair with the porn star out of the Fake News Media until after the election.
There are a lot of reasons to pay people to go away. People do it all the time. Just because it benefits his campaign goal doesnt make it a donation.
 


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Damn, I'm going to have that Avenatti dude pick me some lottery numbers. (Let me break it down to simpler terms you can understand.) Avenatti mentioned the campaign finance violations before there was even mention of a SC nominee, even before Kennedy announced his retirement.

You right wingers are idiots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CpEER
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Damn, I'm going to have that Avenatti dude pick me some lottery numbers. (Let me break it down to simpler terms you can understand.) Avenatti mentioned the campaign finance violations before there was even mention of a SC nominee, even before Kennedy announced his retirement.

You right wingers are idiots.

You're the idiot. It's completely a political ploy, and we're onto the lib game.

  1. SDNY has no say in campaign finance violations, that's all FEC, and they haven't charged anyone from Trump's campaign with anything.
  2. It isn't a crime, based on the regulations for determining. If he has paid off others in the past (and you know he has) before the election, then that's part of his routine regardless of election.
  3. Even IF the stars had aligned, this was Trump's first payoff, he ordered Cohen to do it just for the election, and he's guilty as all getout, you tell me a Republican Senate is going to convict on that garbage?

All I got is LOLz

It's all about the SCOTUS pick, that's why now rather than October.
 
You're the idiot. It's completely a political ploy, and we're onto the lib game.

  1. SDNY has no say in campaign finance violations, that's all FEC, and they haven't charged anyone from Trump's campaign with anything.
  2. It isn't a crime, based on the regulations for determining. If he has paid off others in the past (and you know he has) before the election, then that's part of his routine regardless of election.
  3. Even IF the stars had aligned, this was Trump's first payoff, he ordered Cohen to do it just for the election, and he's guilty as all getout, you tell me a Republican Senate is going to convict on that garbage?

All I got is LOLz


It's all about the SCOTUS pick, that's why now rather than October.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You doubled down. I didn't think you could outdo that last post, but, DAMN son, you came through.

There's so much error in that post, where to start. Hell, I don't think I'll address it all. Btw, where do you get this shit? Fox? trump? Both?

SDNY has no say in breaking the law. That is exactly what you are saying. LOL!

Breaking the law isn't a crime? Why in the hell would a judge accept a guilty plea if a law wasn't broken? Damn, son!

I am assuming by your point 3, you are talking about the Senate convicting trump of impeachment. I'll let the criminal justice system take care of all criminal acts. With this Senate, I wouldn't bet on anything. Trump could murder someone on live tv in the Senate chamber with all Senators witnessing the murder and they wouldn't convict him on impeachment.

Here is the date for the Stormy Daniels lawsuit regarding Cohen and trump.

https://ktla.com/2018/03/26/stormy-daniels-sues-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-defamation/

As you can see, it is dated March 2018. By that time, Avenatti had already known they used campaign funds for the payoff and they knew the timing of the payoff and they knew Cohen had defrauded a bank for the loan.

Here is the date for Kennedy's announcement of retirment.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/us/politics/anthony-kennedy-retire-supreme-court.html

June 27, 2018.

Next conspiracy?
 
Last edited:
  1. SDNY has no say in campaign finance violations, that's all FEC, and they haven't charged anyone from Trump's campaign with anything.
  2. It isn't a crime, based on the regulations for determining. If he has paid off others in the past (and you know he has) before the election, then that's part of his routine regardless of election.
  3. Even IF the stars had aligned, this was Trump's first payoff, he ordered Cohen to do it just for the election, and he's guilty as all getout, you tell me a Republican Senate is going to convict on that garbage?
I am thoroughly confused.....Federal Prosecutors and a Federal judge allowed an attorney with competent representation to plead guilty to something that is not a crime?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CpEER
You're the idiot. It's completely a political ploy, and we're onto the lib game.

  1. SDNY has no say in campaign finance violations, that's all FEC, and they haven't charged anyone from Trump's campaign with anything.
  2. It isn't a crime, based on the regulations for determining. If he has paid off others in the past (and you know he has) before the election, then that's part of his routine regardless of election.
  3. Even IF the stars had aligned, this was Trump's first payoff, he ordered Cohen to do it just for the election, and he's guilty as all getout, you tell me a Republican Senate is going to convict on that garbage?

All I got is LOLz

It's all about the SCOTUS pick, that's why now rather than October.

jKL1MHc.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT