Biden Told Iran "Don't"

[indyrckstar]

C'mon ... another I just hurt you... you can do it!

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[spartansstink]

C'mon, show those tears...

 

[indyrckstar]

Almost... dance for me...

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[indyrckstar]

C'mon, show those tears...

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[spartansstink]

Makes me feel... superior!

 

[indyrckstar]

Makes me feel... superior!

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[indyrckstar]

@spartansstink

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[spartansstink]

You're still no daisy. I win again...

 

[indyrckstar]

@spartansstink

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[indyrckstar]

@spartansstink

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[indyrckstar]

@spartansstink

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[indyrckstar]

@spartansstink

I am going with Tik Tok/Twitter/4 as my response. How does that make you feel?

 

[Gunny46]

@Gunny46

Can we be friend yet? I like your passionate hatred/anger with people. Especially those rotten lefties...

I don't make friends with Communist, Nazis, or Anti-American turds. You work on those issues first then we can determine if you can be redeemed.

 

[indyrckstar]

I don't make friends with Communist, Nazis, or Anti-American turds. You work on those issues first then we can determine if you can be redeemed.

I agree. Hate them as well.

Finally, we are best friends..

 

[Gunny46]

I agree. Hate them as well.

Finally, we are best friends..

No Jihadist symphizers either.

 

[indyrckstar]

No Jihadist symphizers either.

Yep. And no Shiites, KKK, and Israel IDFs either.

We are doing it man!!!!

 

[Gunny46]

Yep. And no Shiites, KKK, and Israel IDFs either.

We are doing it man!!!!

No not even close.

 

[indyrckstar]

No not even close.

We did it!!!!

It's like we are brothers in real life.

 

[indyrckstar]

You're still no daisy. I win again...

Did you win again?

 

[Gunny46]

We did it!!!!

It's like we are brothers in real life.

You're a legend in your own mind.

 

[indyrckstar]

You're a legend in your own mind.

We are legends, brother!

 

[indyrckstar]

So we all agree on Israel creating international crime with genocide, Israel doesn't want two state solution, and Hamas being pure evil.

This about sums of the thread. Don't think anyone has yet to disagree with these talking points.

Oh yea, Tik Tok, Twitter, and WV Rivals is loved by everyone.

editing....

And F Biden and those crazy, extremist Righties/Lefties!

 

[indyrckstar]

By the way, you should really check out the Rogan podcast with Coleman Hughes, since you cited it as Rogan agreeing there was genocide.

Listen from about 1:46 to 2:15. A good solid 30 minutes on the topic and basically stating everything I’ve been saying. Even goes to explain for Urban combat, the number of civilians dying isn’t even that high, and that’s with Hamas intentionally using them as shields. That also is a war crime by the way, as is converting mosques, schools, and hospitals into military installations, and by definition, those installations are allowed to be treated as military targets by the rules of armed conflict.

I mean, you can look it up.

Are you referring to this part?



I actually did watch parts of this before. Just didn't want to invest 3 hours worth though. You should go back and listen to it again though... Coleman was giving his breakdown. To meet agenda, you take Coleman's perspective as aligned to yours, so you take it all as what's really going on.

If I ask for proof on mosque, schools, and hospitals turning into Hamas sites, you are quickly going to find pro-Israel sites/links/etc... and say this it as being the truth. There would have to be 3rd party that are not invested on either side doing real journalist to what is being accurate on the claims from both sides. Meanwhile, Israel controls all allowed media coming in places like Gaza. Today, Israel has banning all foreign media. Agenda much?

Joe Rogan straight up calls it genocide....



Lol. There's other podcasts/videos of him stating it again.

 

[Gunny46]

Bill is correct on this point. So I will give him credit for getting it.

Bill Maher: 'We've passed the Rubicon with 'Death to America' chants on US soil'

"Real Time" host Bill Maher responded to chants of "Death to America" during a Dearborn, Michigan rally of anti-Israel protesters.

www.foxnews.com

And this is what they really want.

"it's the entire sytem that has to go."

Bill Maher: 'We've passed the Rubicon with 'Death to America' chants on US soil'​

 

[Gunny46]

These are the same Communist that have been protesting and rioting the past couple of years. They don't care about the Palestinians people. This is a color revolution and they want to destroy the United States.

 

[Gunny46]

The Communist and Nazis are working together.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[indyrckstar]

These are the same Communist that have been protesting and rioting the past couple of years. They don't care about the Palestinians people. This is a color revolution and they want to destroy the United States.

View embedded media

Some of the tactics people protest are stupid. Blocking streets, burning flags, wearing a shirt on their stance, kneeling at game, rioting the White House, etc.. is not going to help their cause. Usually does the opposite impact.

 

[denvEER]

So we all agree on Israel creating international crime with genocide, Israel doesn't want two state solution, and Hamas being pure evil.

This about sums of the thread. Don't think anyone has yet to disagree with these talking points.

Oh yea, Tik Tok, Twitter, and WV Rivals is loved by everyone.

editing....

And F Biden and those crazy, extremist Righties/Lefties!

How would a two state solution ever be in Israel's best interest? They are constantly going to be hated by the Arab world no matter what.

 

[Gunny46]

Some of the tactics people protest are stupid. Blocking streets, burning flags, wearing a shirt on their stance, kneeling at game, rioting the White House, etc.. is not going to help their cause. Usually does the opposite impact.

Chanting Death to America on our streets isn't protest. It's a goal.

 

[spartansstink]

Are you referring to this part?

View embedded media

I actually did watch parts of this before. Just didn't want to invest 3 hours worth though. You should go back and listen to it again though... Coleman was giving his breakdown. To meet agenda, you take Coleman's perspective as aligned to yours, so you take it all as what's really going on.

If I ask for proof on mosque, schools, and hospitals turning into Hamas sites, you are quickly going to find pro-Israel sites/links/etc... and say this it as being the truth. There would have to be 3rd party that are not invested on either side doing real journalist to what is being accurate on the claims from both sides. Meanwhile, Israel controls all allowed media coming in places like Gaza. Today, Israel has banning all foreign media. Agenda much?

Joe Rogan straight up calls it genocide....

View embedded media

Lol. There's other podcasts/videos of him stating it again.

Your post has two major errors...

First error is you use a fallacy known as an appeal to authority. Appealing to authority is acceptable as long as both sides acknowledge the authority as being an expert. For example, if there was a debate on astrophysics, then using Einstein for proof of your argument would be acceptable. However, using Einstein as an authority on horticulture wouldn't work. Just because a person is an expert in one field doesn't necessary make him one in another.

Your appeal to authority is Joe Rogan? What expertise in the field does he have? Has he written books, dissertations, etc? Has he "lived it"? As far as anyone is aware, all Joe Rogan does is have a podcast where he talks about the topics of the day. This hardly makes him an authority on the matter, he's just a regular Joe (pardon the pun) who happens to have a medium that allows him to express those views everyday.

The second error is the fallacy of false dilemma. This generation believes that if the "evidence" isn't posted on the internet, then it cannot be true. Sadly, they also believe the opposite - if it is on the internet, it must be true. If one uses a website for proof, then you claim that it is just pro-Jew and must be dismissed. Yet, if that is true, then wouldn't the opposite also be true? Anything that is totally pro-Palestinian is equally untrue and must be dismissed?

Your claim that there must be third-party disinterested reporting is correct. There are plenty of those. If someone uses Fox News as a source, then the possibility that the reporting is biased is definitely debatable. Same goes for the Post, NYTimes, and MSNBC. As Americans, we have grown to distrust our reporting and with good reason. But, there are plenty of foreign-press out there reporting the truth. However, just because they report something that disagrees with your worldview doesn't make them biased anymore than when they report something you do agree with it makes them unbiased.

 

[indyrckstar]

Your post has two major errors...

First error is you use a fallacy known as an appeal to authority. Appealing to authority is acceptable as long as both sides acknowledge the authority as being an expert. For example, if there was a debate on astrophysics, then using Einstein for proof of your argument would be acceptable. However, using Einstein as an authority on horticulture wouldn't work. Just because a person is an expert in one field doesn't necessary make him one in another.

Your appeal to authority is Joe Rogan? What expertise in the field does he have? Has he written books, dissertations, etc? Has he "lived it"? As far as anyone is aware, all Joe Rogan does is have a podcast where he talks about the topics of the day. This hardly makes him an authority on the matter, he's just a regular Joe (pardon the pun) who happens to have a medium that allows him to express those views everyday.

The second error is the fallacy of false dilemma. This generation believes that if the "evidence" isn't posted on the internet, then it cannot be true. Sadly, they also believe the opposite - if it is on the internet, it must be true. If one uses a website for proof, then you claim that it is just pro-Jew and must be dismissed. Yet, if that is true, then wouldn't the opposite also be true? Anything that is totally pro-Palestinian is equally untrue and must be dismissed?

Your claim that there must be third-party disinterested reporting is correct. There are plenty of those. If someone uses Fox News as a source, then the possibility that the reporting is biased is definitely debatable. Same goes for the Post, NYTimes, and MSNBC. As Americans, we have grown to distrust our reporting and with good reason. But, there are plenty of foreign-press out there reporting the truth. However, just because they report something that disagrees with your worldview doesn't make them biased anymore than when they report something you do agree with it makes them unbiased.

The answer is still 4...