Here is all you need to know before you waste your time clicking on that "exclusive" story presented as reliably as ever by this poster with
zero attribution.
Here it is, second line into the piece....
Quote: "
The Times' report, citing two people briefed on the matter"...
that's it...there isn't anything else you need to read in this report because it's all based on an anonymous source!
Once again, a non sourced, non identified, non verified, non named, non corroborated "source" is quoted as the sole basis for this story and we're supposed to believe it as fact! This after the 1st unnamed, non sourced, non verified, uncorroborated, still-as-yet-to-appear so called whistleblower has been 100% discredited by shifty Adam's Schiff's 'made up' rendition of the actual eyewitness original complaint & phone call! Now we get treated to another one!
Another poster on this forum suggested this will now be an ongoing almost "daily" thing, with new anonymous 'whistleblowers' coming forward with even more scurrilous unverified charges. Count on this goofy goober filled poster to pass along each and every one of them!
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
Hi..my sources may be anonymous but I'm still a 100% verified
goober... just look at my hat!
